Elsevier

Brain Stimulation

Volume 9, Issue 4, July–August 2016, Pages 545-552
Brain Stimulation

Safety, Tolerability, Blinding Efficacy and Behavioural Effects of a Novel MRI-Compatible, High-Definition tDCS Set-Up

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We tested safety, tolerability and blinding efficacy of a novel high-definition tDCS set-up.

  • We also assessed behavioural effects and compatibility with functional MRI.

  • Effects were compared to those of conventional-tDCS.

  • Only HD-tDCS modulated performance and was better tolerated than conventional-tDCS.

  • The novel set-up is safe for use during MRI.

Abstract

Background

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) may allow more specific neural modulation than conventional-tDCS.

Objective

We compared safety, tolerability, blinding efficacy and cognitive effects of a novel HD-tDCS set-up to that of conventional-tDCS and established compatibility with simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Methods

Two groups of healthy participants completed a visual flanker task either with conventional (N = 30) or HD-tDCS (N = 30) administered to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (1 mA) in a double-blind, sham-tDCS-controlled, cross-over design. HD-tDCS was administered with a one-channel DC-stimulator using a small conductive rubber “centre” electrode and a circular return electrode, mimicking the frequently used 4 × 1 HD-tDCS set-up. Tolerability, adverse effects, impact on performance and blinding efficacy were compared within and between the two montages. In a separate experiment, potential heating and impact on image quality of the novel HD-tDCS set-up were assessed during simultaneous fMRI.

Results

Both montages elicited only mild adverse effects and those were less pronounced for the novel HD-tDCS set-up. Participant and investigator blinding was achieved with both montages. Only HD-tDCS resulted in significant modulation of the conflict adaptation effect during the flanker task; however, no differences were found for the direct comparison of the two montages. No significant heating occurred during fMRI and only minor effects on image quality were observed during HD-tDCS.

Conclusions

This study confirmed safety, tolerability and blinding efficacy of a novel, re-usable and MRI-compatible HD-tDCS set-up. It also highlights its potential to exert beneficial effects on behavioural performance. Use of this novel set-up during simultaneous fMRI in future studies will help clarify the neural mechanisms by which this HD-tDCS impacts on behavioural and neural function.

Introduction

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve cognition, motor function and learning in health and disease [1], [2], [3], [4]. Conventional-tDCS set-ups typically employ two rubber electrodes (e.g., 5 × 5 or 5 × 7 cm2) and the ingoing current is projected from one electrode that is attached over a cortical target region to a return electrode that is attached over a different cortical area or an extracranial region [5]. This set-up may result in relatively non-focal stimulation due to the size of the electrodes, and regions between the two electrodes may also be affected as demonstrated by recent current modelling studies [6], [7].

More recently, “high-definition” tDCS (HD-tDCS) has been introduced to address these issues [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. HD-tDCS typically employs more than two smaller electrodes and electrode positioning is frequently guided by advanced computational modelling approaches to optimize stimulation of the target region [8], [12]. To date, one of the most frequently used HD-tDCS montages is the so-called “4 × 1 ring set-up” which employs a centre electrode that is surrounded by four return electrodes. The latter are arranged in a circle around the centre electrode and thought to constrain the current flow to the region between the centre and ring electrodes [6]. This set-up may result in more focal stimulation and potentially more effective modulation of behaviour and neurophysiological parameters than conventional-tDCS. For example, HD-tDCS has been shown to enhance motor cortex excitability with comparable [13] or longer lasting effects [7] compared to conventional-tDCS. HD-tDCS also resulted in significantly improved verbal learning and working memory in healthy individuals [14], facilitated naming in patients with post-stroke language impairment [15], and has been shown to be safe and well tolerated while blinding of participants was maintained [7], [10], [15], [16], [17].

However, previous HD-tDCS studies employed silver chloride electrodes that are susceptible to electrochemical changes requiring costly replacement sets after only a few stimulation sessions [6], [18]. HD-tDCS also requires expensive multi-channel stimulators [7] or additional soft- and hardware [6] compared to conventional-tDCS. Moreover, while conductive rubber electrodes used during conventional-tDCS can be used during simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the impact of the stimulation on brain function (e.g., References [19], [20], [21], [22]), electrodes employed in previous HD-tDCS studies are incompatible with fMRI.

Thus, the present study employed a novel HD-tDCS set-up that utilizes conductive rubber electrodes (i.e., a small centre electrode and a ring-shaped circular electrode) mimicking the standard 4 × 1 ring set-up. Importantly, the electrodes used in the present study were developed to be re-usable over longer time periods and are fMRI compatible (NeuroConn, Illmenau). We assessed safety, tolerability, blinding effectiveness and the impact on mood and performance during a cognitive task using this novel set-up and also aimed to compare effects to those of fMRI compatible conventional-tDCS. In addition, MRI-compatibility of the new HD-tDCS set-up was established. Based on previous studies that compared the 4 × 1 set-up with conventional-tDCS [7], [23], we hypothesized that the novel HD-tDCS set-up would be safe and well tolerated, allows for effective blinding of participants and researchers, and improves cognitive performance compared to sham HD-tDCS, with comparable or superior effects compared to conventional-tDCS. Further, as in previous studies that employed conventional-tDCS during simultaneous fMRI [19], [20], [24], no heating underneath the electrodes and only minor imaging artefacts were expected.

Section snippets

Study overview

The main study employed double-blind, sham-tDCS-controlled, cross-over designs and two groups of participants completed a visual flanker task [25] either with conventional- or HD-tDCS. The latter comprised a small conductive rubber electrode (“centre electrode”) and a circular (“ring”) electrode mimicking the conventional 4 × 1 HD-tDCS set-up [6]. HD- and conventional-tDCS were both administered to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the impact of the two montages

Results

Both montages were tolerated well and only mild adverse effects were reported.

Discussion

This study confirmed the safety, tolerability and blinding efficacy of a novel, re-usable and MRI compatible HD-tDCS set-up. Overall, only mild adverse effects were reported by participants in the HD-tDCS group and participant and investigator blinding was achieved. The comparison with conventional-tDCS revealed slightly superior tolerability and blinding efficacy of the novel HD-tDCS set-up, while no effects on mood were reported for both montages. Only HD-tDCS resulted in performance

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council (FT120100608) and The National Health and Medical Research Council (1085272) awarded to Marcus Meinzer. We thank Aiman Al Najjar and Don Maillet for assistance with the intrascanner temperature measurements.

References (43)

  • T.T. Brunyé et al.

    Mitigating cutaneous sensation differences during tDCS: comparing sham versus low intensity control conditions

    Brain Stimul

    (2014)
  • A. Antal et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • R. Holland et al.

    Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation

    Curr Biol

    (2011)
  • M. Meinzer et al.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: behavioral effects and neural mechanisms

    Alzheimers Dement

    (2015)
  • M.C. Anderson et al.

    Inhibitory control over action and memory

  • P.C. Gandiga et al.

    Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2006)
  • J.C. Horvath et al.

    Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Brain Stimul

    (2015)
  • M. Meinzer et al.

    Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia

    Brain

    (2016)
  • M.A. Nitsche et al.

    Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex

    J Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • A.F. DaSilva et al.

    State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control

    Front Neuroanat

    (2015)
  • J.P. Dmochowski et al.

    Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target

    J Neural Eng

    (2011)
  • Cited by (58)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text