Predicting return of fear following exposure therapy with an implicit measure of attitudes
Highlights
► We applied a social psychological perspective on attitudes to understanding the effects of exposure therapy. ► Attitudes involve automatic and controlled processes and implicit measures tap the former. ► Return of fear (ROF) should be likely when automatically activated attitudes remain negative following treatment. ► As predicted, a Personalized Implicit Association Test following treatment predicted ROF at 1-month follow-up. ► Change in the automatic phobic attitude is an important goal of exposure therapy.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants were 40 adults (60% female) ranging in age from 18 to 46 years (M = 22.4, SD = 5.7). Most members of the sample self-identified as Caucasian (70%), with 17.5% Asian-American, 7.5% Hispanic, and 5% Bi- or Multi-Racial. Based on administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995), all participants met diagnostic criteria at minimum for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) in the context of public speaking, with 20% also
Did fear decline significantly following treatment?
Paired t-tests revealed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment on all measures (Table 1). Most notably, PIAT scores were significantly reduced, indicating a less negative attitude representation following treatment.
Did ROF occur at follow-up?
ROF was assessed at both the average and the individual levels. As shown in Table 1, on average, significant increases from post-treatment to follow-up were seen in anticipatory STAI scores for BAT 2 but not BAT 1. A similar pattern emerged for pre-speech SUDs ratings
Discussion
In this study we sought to advance understanding of the processes underlying the efficacy of exposure therapy and particularly the phenomenon of ROF by drawing on a social psychological view of phobias as attitudes. Specifically, based on the MODE model (Fazio, 1990), we predicted that individuals completing exposure therapy would vary in the degree to which their attitude representation of the phobic situation was successfully modified as a result of the learning opportunities afforded by
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grant MH38832 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first and last authors. The authors thank Dr. Joseph P. DeCola for providing clinical supervision for the study, Deborah Sharp for her assistance with the PIAT, and Andrew Brush, Greg Hilbert, Kaitlyn Fieseler, Marissa Mishne, and Jennifer Varela for their help with speech coding.
References (41)
The theory of planned behavior
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1991)- et al.
An information processing model of anxiety: automatic and strategic processes
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1997) - et al.
Treatment of specific phobia in adults
Clinical Psychology Review
(2007) - et al.
The validity of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2005) - et al.
Optimizing inhibitory learning during exposure therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2008) Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework
- et al.
Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT?
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2010) - et al.
The influence of experimentally-created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2006) - et al.
Expectancy-learning and evaluative learning in human classical conditioning: affective priming as an indirect and unobtrusive measure of conditioned valence
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2002) - et al.
Beyond fear and disgust: the role of (automatic) contamination-related associations in spider phobia
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(2007)
Mechanisms of exposure therapy: how neuroscience can improve psychological treatments for anxiety disorders
Clinical Psychology Review
How do I appear to others? Social anxiety and processing of the observable self
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety: a review and an integrative model
Clinical Psychology Review
Normative data for the personal report of confidence as a speaker
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
The return of fear: review and prospect
Clinical Psychology Review
Timing of treatment and return of fear: effects of massed, uniform, and expanding-spaced exposure schedules
Behavior Therapy
Perception of arousal in social anxiety: effects of false feedback during social interaction
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: the case of shy behavior
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Counteracting the context-dependence of extinction: relapse and tests of some relapse prevention methods
Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications
Cited by (45)
Positive mood induction does not reduce return of fear: A virtual reality exposure study for public speaking anxiety
2024, Behaviour Research and TherapyIs disgust more resistant to extinction than fear? A meta-analytic review of laboratory paradigms
2024, Behaviour Research and TherapyEfficacy and mechanisms of change in exposure-based and cognitive stand-alone body image interventions in women with overweight and obesity
2022, Behaviour Research and TherapyFuture-Oriented Positive Mental Imagery Reduces Anxiety for Exposure to Public Speaking
2022, Behavior TherapyOld Fears Die Hard: Return of Public Speaking Fear in a Virtual Reality Procedure
2021, Behavior TherapyCitation Excerpt :First, we found emotional concordance patterns during exposure (reduced HR, subjective distress, negative valence, and arousal ratings), but not during spontaneous recovery and fear renewal tests. This may reflect random variation across response indices and is consistent with findings of similar studies (e.g., Craske et al., 2019; Vasey et al., 2012) and with the general fear conditioning literature (e.g., Mertens et al., 2018) in which subjective and physiological responses also substantially varied. One plausible explanation for this variation is that lab studies may not always evoke sufficient fear for full emotional concordance to occur (Hollenstein & Lanteigne, 2014).