Predicting return of fear following exposure therapy with an implicit measure of attitudes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.08.007Get rights and content

Abstract

We sought to advance understanding of the processes underlying the efficacy of exposure therapy and particularly the phenomenon of return of fear (ROF) following treatment by drawing on a social psychological view of phobias as attitudes. Specifically, a dual process theory of attitude-related behavior predicts that a positive response to exposure therapy may reflect change in either the automatic (the attitude representation itself) or controlled (skills and confidence at coping with the fear) responses to the phobic stimulus, or both. However, if the attitude representation remains negative following treatment, ROF should be more likely. We tested this hypothesis in a clinical sample of individuals with public speaking phobia using a single-session exposure therapy protocol previously shown to be efficacious but also associated with some ROF. Consistent with predictions, a post-treatment implicit measure of attitudes toward public speaking (the Personalized Implicit Association Test [PIAT]) predicted ROF at 1-month follow-up. These results suggest that change in the automatically activated attitude toward the phobic stimulus is an important goal of exposure therapy and that an implicit measure like the PIAT can provide a useful measure of such change by which to gauge the adequacy of exposure treatment and predict its long-term efficacy.

Highlights

► We applied a social psychological perspective on attitudes to understanding the effects of exposure therapy. ► Attitudes involve automatic and controlled processes and implicit measures tap the former. ► Return of fear (ROF) should be likely when automatically activated attitudes remain negative following treatment. ► As predicted, a Personalized Implicit Association Test following treatment predicted ROF at 1-month follow-up. ► Change in the automatic phobic attitude is an important goal of exposure therapy.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were 40 adults (60% female) ranging in age from 18 to 46 years (M = 22.4, SD = 5.7). Most members of the sample self-identified as Caucasian (70%), with 17.5% Asian-American, 7.5% Hispanic, and 5% Bi- or Multi-Racial. Based on administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995), all participants met diagnostic criteria at minimum for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) in the context of public speaking, with 20% also

Did fear decline significantly following treatment?

Paired t-tests revealed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment on all measures (Table 1). Most notably, PIAT scores were significantly reduced, indicating a less negative attitude representation following treatment.

Did ROF occur at follow-up?

ROF was assessed at both the average and the individual levels. As shown in Table 1, on average, significant increases from post-treatment to follow-up were seen in anticipatory STAI scores for BAT 2 but not BAT 1. A similar pattern emerged for pre-speech SUDs ratings

Discussion

In this study we sought to advance understanding of the processes underlying the efficacy of exposure therapy and particularly the phenomenon of ROF by drawing on a social psychological view of phobias as attitudes. Specifically, based on the MODE model (Fazio, 1990), we predicted that individuals completing exposure therapy would vary in the degree to which their attitude representation of the phobic situation was successfully modified as a result of the learning opportunities afforded by

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grant MH38832 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first and last authors. The authors thank Dr. Joseph P. DeCola for providing clinical supervision for the study, Deborah Sharp for her assistance with the PIAT, and Andrew Brush, Greg Hilbert, Kaitlyn Fieseler, Marissa Mishne, and Jennifer Varela for their help with speech coding.

References (41)

  • R.J. McNally

    Mechanisms of exposure therapy: how neuroscience can improve psychological treatments for anxiety disorders

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2007)
  • W. Mansell et al.

    How do I appear to others? Social anxiety and processing of the observable self

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1999)
  • A.J. Ouimet et al.

    Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety: a review and an integrative model

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2009)
  • G.C. Phillips et al.

    Normative data for the personal report of confidence as a speaker

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1997)
  • S.J. Rachman

    The return of fear: review and prospect

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1989)
  • J.C.I. Tsao et al.

    Timing of treatment and return of fear: effects of massed, uniform, and expanding-spaced exposure schedules

    Behavior Therapy

    (2000)
  • J. Wild et al.

    Perception of arousal in social anxiety: effects of false feedback during social interaction

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • J.B. Asendorpf et al.

    Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: the case of shy behavior

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2002)
  • M.E. Bouton et al.

    Counteracting the context-dependence of extinction: relapse and tests of some relapse prevention methods

  • M.G. Craske et al.

    Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications

    (2006)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Old Fears Die Hard: Return of Public Speaking Fear in a Virtual Reality Procedure

      2021, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, we found emotional concordance patterns during exposure (reduced HR, subjective distress, negative valence, and arousal ratings), but not during spontaneous recovery and fear renewal tests. This may reflect random variation across response indices and is consistent with findings of similar studies (e.g., Craske et al., 2019; Vasey et al., 2012) and with the general fear conditioning literature (e.g., Mertens et al., 2018) in which subjective and physiological responses also substantially varied. One plausible explanation for this variation is that lab studies may not always evoke sufficient fear for full emotional concordance to occur (Hollenstein & Lanteigne, 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text