Therapeutic alliance in guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioural treatment of depression, generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Guided internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) has been found to be effective in several controlled trials, but the mechanisms of change are largely unknown. Therapeutic alliance is a factor that has been studied in many psychotherapy trials, but the role of therapeutic alliance in ICBT is less well known. The present study investigated early alliance ratings in three separate samples. Participants from one sample of depressed individuals (N = 49), one sample of individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (N = 35), and one sample with social anxiety disorder (N = 90) completed the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) modified for ICBT early in the treatment (weeks 3–4) when they took part in guided ICBT for their conditions. Results showed that alliance ratings were high in all three samples and that the WAI including the subscales of Task, Goal and Bond had high internal consistencies. Overall, correlations between the WAI and residualized change scores on the primary outcome measures were small and not statistically significant. We conclude that even if alliance ratings are in line with face-to-face studies, therapeutic alliance as measured by the WAI is probably less important in ICBT than in regular face-to-face psychotherapy.

Highlights

► We studied therapeutic alliance in Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT). ► Therapeutic alliance does not seem to play any major role in ICBT. ► The findings are important as they add to the literature on alliance and CBT.

Introduction

The concept of therapeutic alliance, also known as the working alliance, is often regarded as an important ingredient in psychotherapy across different psychotherapy orientations (Lambert & Barley, 2002), but has been studied to a lesser extent in alternative treatment formats such as group therapy and guided self-help. Bordin (1979) introduced a model for understanding therapeutic alliance in which he made distinctions between task, goal and bond, which together form the concept of alliance (Bordin, 1979).

During the last 15 years there has been a rapid development of new ways to deliver cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), and of these new approaches the internet has probably been the format with the most studies (Andersson, 2009). Many studies on internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) have involved guidance which tends to boost the effect (Andersson & Cuijpers, 2009; Spek, Cuijpers et al., 2007), usually to the extent that guided ICBT and face-to-face therapy yield equivalent outcomes (Bergström et al., 2010; Hedman et al., 2011). Equal outcomes have been found in studies on panic disorder (Bergström et al., 2010; Carlbring et al., 2005; Kiropoulos et al., 2008), social anxiety disorder (Andrews, Davies, & Titov, 2011; Hedman et al., 2011), and subclinical depression (Spek, Nyklicek et al., 2007), but also in studies on conditions like tinnitus (Kaldo et al., 2008).

The role of the therapeutic alliance in guided ICBT is not obvious as there is much less therapist contact than in face-to-face treatments (approximately 1/10 of the time), and that the client may not even see the therapist in person. Still there is a therapeutic interaction as the therapist responds to messages sent from the client and uses both specific and common factors to encourage the client to work with the ICBT (Paxling et al., in press). The development of a therapeutic alliance may not necessarily require direct face-to-face contact with a therapist. It is possible that alliance is at least partly based on client expectations regarding both tasks and goals that may exist before the therapy starts. While the bond between the therapist and the client probably is different in ICBT than in face-to-face therapy questions regarding task, goal and bond are still relevant. Therefore we believe that a therapeutic alliance can be formed over the internet as the therapist in ICBT provides individualized encouragement on progress and also responds to difficulties the client may confront when working with self-help material. Moreover, self-help texts can include aspects that help form a therapeutic alliance and a client may perceive an understanding clinician who is behind the text material (Richardson, Richards, & Barkham, 2010). In other words the total information available for clients when rating the alliance can consist of interactions with a therapist online, interactions with a treatment system, and text material that can possibly boost the alliance.

There has been some previous research on the role of alliance in internet treatments. Cook and Doyle (2002) studied alliance ratings in a small sample (N = 15) and compared the ratings with those from a previous study sample who had received face-to-face therapy. Contrary to expectations the client rated alliance was higher in the online therapy group (Cook & Doyle, 2002). This finding was replicated in a study on e-mail counselling in which the authors found high ratings of alliance (D'Arcy, Reynolds, Stiles, & Grohol, 2006), that were within the range of what has been found in face-to-face studies. A limitation of both studies is the lack of a control group as they used previously reported results for the face-to-face comparisons. In a study on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Knaevelsrud and Maercker (2006) found high ratings of alliance, even if alliance was not a strong predictor of outcome (Knaevelsrud & Maercker, 2006). However in a subsequent report, the same authors found that alliance scores increased during treatment and that ratings of alliance at the end of treatment correlated with treatment outcome (N = 41) (Knaevelsrud & Maercker, 2007). Klein, Austin, et al. (2009) and Klein, Mitchell et al. (2009) studied the role of frequency of therapist e-mail contact in a trial on panic disorder. They found no differences in client alliance ratings between the intensive contact condition (average therapist time 308 min) versus the infrequent contact condition (average therapist time 205 min) (Klein, Austin et al., 2009). The authors concluded that the time spent with the therapist may not be a key variable when rating alliance. Overall, ratings of alliance were high, which the same researchers also found in another study on posttraumatic stress disorder (Klein, Mitchell, et al., 2009). Correlations with outcome were not reported.

In light of the previous findings which indicate that alliance can be formed in ICBT we wanted to investigate alliance ratings by clients who were research participants in three different ICBT programs. The first was a study on ICBT for depression (Vernmark et al., 2010) in which internet-delivered guided self-help was compared with e-mail therapy. Ratings of therapeutic alliance were collected from the participants between week 3 and 4 of the treatment. The second data set was from a controlled trial on ICBT for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), in which guided ICBT was tested against a waiting-list control group (Paxling et al., 2011). Alliance ratings were collected during the third treatment week. The third data set was derived from a study on social anxiety disorder (SAD), in which ICBT was tested against a waiting-list control group who participated in an online discussion forum (Andersson, Carlbring, Furmark, & on behalf of the SOFIE Research Group, 2012). Alliance ratings were collected at the beginning of the fourth treatment week. We expected high ratings of alliance and investigated if ratings of alliance would be predictive of treatment outcome.

Section snippets

Background

Data were collected in association with a controlled study on ICBT for major depression (Vernmark et al., 2010). All participants were interviewed live, but self-report instruments including alliance ratings were collected via the internet. Treatment was provided on the internet and each participant had an online therapist who followed them for the full 8 week treatment period.

Procedure

A total of 88 persons with a confirmed diagnosis of major depression (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) were

Background

Data in sample II were collected during a controlled study on ICBT for GAD (Paxling et al., 2011). Participants were screened online and thereafter interviewed over the telephone. As in sample I, self-report instruments and alliance ratings were collected via the internet. Treatment was provided via the internet and each participant had an online therapist who guided them through the 8 week treatment period.

Procedure

Following screening and interview we included 89 persons diagnosed with GAD (American

Background

Data for sample III were collected in association with a controlled study on ICBT for SAD (Andersson, Carlbring, & Furmark, & on behalf of the SOFIE Research Group, 2012). Similar to the sample II participants were screened online and then interviewed over the telephone to obtain a DSM-IV diagnosis of social phobia (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Self-report instruments including the short WAI were collected online. The guided ICBT treatment lasted for 9 weeks and each participant had

Discussion

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of therapeutic alliance in guided ICBT. We included data from three study samples diagnosed with major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, or social anxiety disorder. The rationale for the study was that guided ICBT has been found to be effective (Andrews, Cuijpers, Craske, McEvoy, & Titov, 2010), but the mechanisms driving the effects are largely unknown (Andersson, 2010). Therapeutic alliance is often regarded as an important factor in

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored in part by grants from the Swedish council for working and life research, the Swedish research council, and Linköping University. We thank all coworkers in the Klara, Origo and Sofie 6 trials for the contributions.

References (62)

  • G. Steketee et al.

    Methodological issues in prediction of treatment outcome

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1992)
  • K. Vernmark et al.

    Internet administered guided self-help versus individualized e-mail therapy: a randomized trial of two versions of CBT for major depression

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2010)
  • H.N. Ahn et al.

    Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy

    Journal of Counseling Psychology

    (2001)
  • J. Almlöv et al.

    Therapist factors in internet-delivered CBT for major depressive disorder

    Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

    (2009)
  • J. Almlöv et al.

    Therapist effects in guided Internet-delivered CBT for anxiety disorders

    Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

    (2011)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2000)
  • G. Andersson

    The promise and pitfalls of the internet for cognitive behavioural therapy

    BMC Medicine

    (2010)
  • G. Andersson et al.

    Internet-based self-help for depression: a randomised controlled trial

    British Journal of Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • G. Andersson et al.

    Therapist experience and knowledge acquisition in Internet-delivered CBT for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial

    PloS ONE

    (2012)
  • G. Andersson et al.

    Internet-based self-help with therapist feedback and in-vivo group exposure for social phobia: a randomized controlled trial

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2006)
  • G. Andersson et al.

    Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis

    Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

    (2009)
  • G. Andrews et al.

    Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis

    PloS ONE

    (2010)
  • G. Andrews et al.

    Effectiveness randomized controlled trial of face to face versus Internet cognitive behaviour therapy for social phobia

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • T.P. Andrusyna et al.

    The factor structure of the working alliance inventory in cognitive-behavioral therapy

    The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research

    (2001)
  • L. Aydos et al.

    Shyness 5: the clinical effectiveness of internet-based clinician-assisted treatment of social phobia

    Australasian Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • J.P. Barber et al.

    Alliance predicts patients' outcome beyond in-treatment change in symptoms

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2000)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • V. Beckner et al.

    Alliance in two telephone-administered treatments: relationship with depression and health outcomes

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2007)
  • N. Bendelin et al.

    Experiences of guided internet-based cognitive-behavioural treatment for depression: a qualitative study

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • J. Bergström et al.

    Internet- versus group-administered cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in a psychiatric setting: a randomised trial

    BMC Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • E.S. Bordin

    The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance

    Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

    (1979)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text