Elsevier

Body Image

Volume 12, January 2015, Pages 73-77
Body Image

Review article
Body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy: A meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy were explored.

  • Data were from 2495 participants across 11 studies.

  • Meta-analytic results revealed r = −.25, Cohen's d = −0.52.

  • As body dissatisfaction increases, condom use self-efficacy decreases.

Abstract

The consistent use of condoms is the most effective behavior for reducing the acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and condom use self-efficacy has been shown to be a key construct related to condom use. However, the examination of modifiable psychosocial and behavioral correlates of condom use self-efficacy is lacking. Recent investigations have highlighted the association of body dissatisfaction with condom use self-efficacy, and the current study conducted a meta-analysis on all available data addressing this relationship. Eleven individual effect-size parameters from nine studies yielded a total sample of 2495 men and women participants. A random-effects model revealed an average effect-size of r = −.25, Cohen's d = −0.52, which is moderate in strength. As body dissatisfaction increases, ones’ self-efficacy regarding the use of condoms diminishes. Integrating interventions to decrease body dissatisfaction and sexual risk behaviors may prove to be an effective strategy to decrease STIs.

Introduction

Safer sexual practices, such as consistent condom use, are important preventative measures against the spread and transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), yet less than half of U.S. adults use condoms during sex with non-regular partners (e.g., Anderson, 2003). There is ongoing evidence that efforts to promote consistent condom use in the U.S. are needed, in that the rates of new HIV infections have not decreased in the past decade (CDC, 2013), and that the prevalence of STIs is estimated at 110 million in the U.S., with roughly 20 million new infections per year (Satterwhite et al., 2013). Accordingly, studies examining psychosocial and behavioral variables that can be modified and reduce HIV and STI acquisition are still needed, as traditional efforts are not achieving their goals (e.g., Crepaz et al., 2006, Herbst et al., 2007).

Use of condoms operates in conjunction with psychosocial variables. Condom use self-efficacy, defined as confidence in one's ability to practice safer sex in difficult situations, is one variable that has been featured prominently in many models of health behaviors, such as social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1994). This theory, applied to safer sex behaviors, proposes that individuals engage in a process of evaluating the relative advantages and disadvantages of using condoms during sex (e.g., social norms of condom use, knowledge about STIs, and expectancies regarding condom use). These cognitive processes subsequently predict one's level of self-efficacy. Self-efficacy then becomes the salient variable in terms of whether an individual engages in unprotected vs. safer sex practices. Empirically, self-efficacy has been strongly related to actual use of condoms among a variety of populations (e.g., Baele et al., 2001, Wulfert et al., 1999, Wulfert and Wan, 1993, Wulfert et al., 1996), and meta-analytic data have revealed medium-sized effects with actual condom use for both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Sheeran, Abraham, & Orbell, 1999). One study compared social cognitive theory, with self-efficacy, to the two other most frequently used theories related to condom use, the health belief model and theory of reasoned action (Wulfert et al., 1996). Results indicated that self-efficacy explained variance in condom use above and beyond that accounted for by the other two models, highlighting its value in promoting safer sex behaviors.

Although condom use self-efficacy has been established as a salient predictor of condom use, proposed psychosocial variables that might contribute to condom use self-efficacy have been limited. One construct that has recently received increased attention in this area is body dissatisfaction. Body dissatisfaction may be defined as possessing negative evaluation about one's body or appearance (Cash, 2002). Theoretically, it has been argued that elevated body dissatisfaction may be associated with lowered condom use self-efficacy. Individuals who have concerns regarding their appearance report heightened worry about receiving negative evaluations from others (e.g., Cash, Thériault, & Annis, 2004). In the context of sexual behaviors, where exposed bodies are central, engaging in discussions regarding condom use may lead individuals with body dissatisfaction to experience increased anxiety, perhaps concerned that this negotiation with sexual partners will lead to rejection. Thus, individuals with elevated body dissatisfaction may lack assertiveness in broaching the use of condoms, and may be less likely to initiate conversation around safer sex practices.

Empirically, a number of studies have found significant relationships between body dissatisfaction and lowered condom use self-efficacy. Most of these studies sampled adolescent or young adult women (i.e., Gillen et al., 2006, Salazar et al., 2004, Schooler et al., 2005, Swenson, 2007, Van Anders, 2013, Watson et al., 2013, Weaver and Byers, 2006, Yamamiya et al., 2006). Comparably fewer studies have assessed these relationships among men (for exceptions, see Blashill et al., 2014, Gillen et al., 2006, Van Anders, 2013). Of those, Blashill et al. (2014) sampled men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV, and found a medium-sized effect between body dissatisfaction and lower condom use self-efficacy. The limited studies on heterosexual men have revealed conflicting results, with Gillen et al. (2006) finding a null result, and others noting a significant medium-sized effect (Schooler and Ward, 2006, Van Anders, 2013). Thus, it would seem that the relationship between body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy has been less consistently studied among men as compared to women.

To date, there has been limited empirical examination of psychosocial predictors of condom use self-efficacy, the key predictive variable in social cognitive theory. Body dissatisfaction is prevalent among men and women (24–32% for men and 35–38% for women; Peplau et al., 2009), and emerging data have begun to reveal significant associations with condom use self-efficacy. However, to our knowledge, there have been no attempts to integrate the data on this topic to yield a summary of the significance and size of the effect of body dissatisfaction on condom use self-efficacy. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis on all available, published and unpublished, data on body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy among men and women. It was hypothesized that a significant inverse relationship would be revealed between body dissatisfaction and condom-use self-efficacy. Although there are limited data to guide directional hypotheses, a preliminary moderation analysis was also conducted, examining the differential effect of participant sex on body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy.

Section snippets

Data Collection

Multiple strategies were utilized to locate potential studies for the meta-analysis. First, computer-based searches were conducted via Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and Medline, using the following keywords: condom use, condom use self-efficacy, self-efficacy, sexual risk, sexual risk behaviors, body image, body image disturbance, body dissatisfaction, body esteem, body attitudes, weight concerns, and shape concerns. Second, the references of selected articles were examined for additional studies

Results

Eleven effect-size parameters were included in the analysis of the relationship between condom use self-efficacy and body dissatisfaction, resulting in a total sample size of 2495. A random-effects model was used to calculate the average effect-size estimate and confidence interval (95%). Results revealed a medium effect-size parameter, which was significantly different from zero, r = −.25, 95% CI: −.31, −.18, z = −7.30, p < .001, Cohen's d = −0.52; however, significant heterogeneity was found, Q = 26.8,

Discussion

The aim of the current study was to assess the relationship between body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy amongst all available published and unpublished studies on this topic. Results from a random-effects model yielded a medium-size parameter, which was significantly different from zero. This was the first known study to empirically aggregate the data on the association of body dissatisfaction and condom use self-efficacy. The results from the current study highlight the

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers K23MH096647, to Aaron Blashill, and K24MH094214, to Steven Safren.

References1 (38)

  • CDC. (2013). HIV Surveillance Report, 2011; vol. 23. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/....
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • N. Crepaz et al.

    Do prevention interventions reduce HIV risk behaviours among people living with HIV? A meta-analytic review of controlled trials

    AIDS

    (2006)
  • R.J. DiClemente et al.

    A prospective study of psychological distress and sexual risk behavior among black adolescent females

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • M.M. *Gillen et al.

    Does body image play a role in risky sexual behavior and attitudes?

    Journal of Youth and Adolescence

    (2006)
  • J.H. Herbst et al.

    The effectiveness of individual, group, and community-level HIV behavioral risk-reduction interventions for adult men who have sex with men: A systematic review

    American Journal of Preventative Medicine

    (2007)
  • J.A. Lehrer et al.

    Depressive symptoms as a longitudinal predictor of sexual risk behaviors among US middle and high school students

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • M.W. Lipsey et al.

    Practical meta-analysis

    (2001)
  • B. Mustanski et al.

    Psychosocial health problems increase risk for HIV among urban young men who have sex with men: Preliminary evidence of a syndemic in need of attention

    Annals of Behavioral Medicine

    (2007)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Sexting with benefits? Exploration of sexting behaviours through the lens of protection motivation theory

      2022, Body Image
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, women who evaluated their appearance more positively tended to engage in sexual activities more frequently and experienced greater sexual satisfaction (Woertman & van den Brink, 2012). Those who were dissatisfied with their bodies exhibited decreased desire to have sex, higher sexual avoidance, reduced sexual satisfaction, and compromised sexual assertiveness (Auslander et al., 2012; Blashill & Safren, 2015; La Rocque & Cioe, 2011; Woertman & van den Brink, 2012; Yamamiya et al., 2006). Lesser attention has been paid to the relationship between body image and sexual functioning among men, yet the extant research shows that positive body image is related to greater sexual satisfaction (Holt & Lyness, 2007), whilst negative evaluations of one’s appearance are related to erectile dysfunctions, premature ejaculation, and avoidance of sexual activities (La Rocque & Cioe, 2011; Levitan et al., 2018).

    • What are you looking at? Body image esteem and sexting behaviors among emerging Australian adults

      2021, Computers in Human Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Boys and men, on the other hand, tend to express greater dissatisfaction with muscle mass, which reflects gendered sociocultural influences underpinning different aspects of body image dissatisfaction among women and men (Karazsia et al., 2017). Numerous studies have indicated that women who appraise their physical appearance negatively tend to avoid sexual activities, or report poorer sexual functioning, decreased sexual satisfaction and assertiveness (Blashill & Safren, 2015; Quinn-Nilas et al., 2016; Woertman & Van den Brink, 2012). Although a lot less research has been conducted on satisfaction with body image and sexual functioning among men, existing evidence suggests a link between negative body image appraisals, sexual dysfunction, lower sexual satisfaction, and sexual avoidance among this population as well (Komarnicky et al., 2019; La Rocque & Cioe, 2011).

    • Body dissatisfaction and sexual orientations: A quantitative synthesis of 30 years research findings

      2020, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      A computer-based literature search was conducted for studies involving body dissatisfaction and sexual orientations published up to April 2019 using PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, as well as Google Scholar. Based on previous meta-analyses on body dissatisfaction and/or sexual orientation (Blashill, 2011; Blashill & Safren, 2015; Menzel et al., 2010; Morrison et al., 2004), the combinations of the following search terms were used: (a) “body image”, “body dissatisfaction”, “body satisfaction”, “body attitude”, “muscle dysmorphia”, “muscles”, “drive for muscularity”, “weight concern”, or “shape concern” in conjunction with (b) “sexual orientation”, “gay”, “lesbian”, “bisexual*”, “homosexual*”, or “sexual minority”. Additionally, manual search of the reference lists in the identified articles were conducted to locate any additional related studies.

    • Update on Syphilis for Women's Health Nurses

      2020, Nursing for Women's Health
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    * Denotes primary study included in the meta-analysis.

    View full text