MasterclassCore outcome sets for research and clinical practice
Section snippets
Background
The efficacy or effectiveness of health interventions is ordinarily assessed in randomized clinical trials which compare the outcome of the health intervention under study with a control group such as placebo treatment (for efficacy trials), or alternatives such as usual care or no treatment (for effectiveness trials).1 Since outcomes are supposed to reflect beneficial and adverse effects of the interventions, they need to be appropriate and assessed with validated instruments to make the
What is a core outcome set?
A COS is an agreed, standardized and minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific health condition.13 This core set should be consensually agreed to by all the relevant stakeholders (e.g., health care professionals, researchers, policy makers, people who fund health services and research, industry representatives, patients, and the public).14 A COS does not mandate which outcome(s) should be designated as primary outcome(s) in a trial, and
How to develop a core outcome set?
The first step in the development of a COS is to establish its scope, i.e. to determine which population, interventions, study design and/or settings, the COS should apply to.13, 20 Regarding the scope, there are COSs that have been developed to apply to the effectiveness of all interventions for a quite generic health condition, such as the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) which focuses on all interventions for all chronic pain conditions.21
Core outcome sets for musculoskeletal conditions
Musculoskeletal disorders are among the most burdensome health conditions, with LBP recognized to be the highest ranked cause of disability worldwide.56 Various health care professionals are routinely involved in managing patients with musculoskeletal conditions and, for example, this is the area in which there are more publications on physical therapy interventions.57 An early COS in this field was proposed by Deyo et al.58 for LBP and included the following five health domains: ‘pain
Core outcome sets for other conditions and directions for future research
While the majority of initiatives around outcomes standardization relevant for rehabilitation is in the musculoskeletal health area, there are also initial attempts to develop COSs in other areas. For example, in the stroke rehabilitation field, while there is already a COS for acute stroke management,74 an international collaboration named as the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable was recently formed with the goal of standardizing of research and, specifically, also outcomes
Conclusion
A COS can facilitate outcomes consistency across studies and consistent reporting in clinical research. Evidence synthesis on the effectiveness of various health interventions could benefit from a wide and structured implementation of COSs in clinical trials. A COS is represented by a set of recommendations regarding core outcome domains and measurement instruments to be measured and reported, thereby not mandating which outcome(s) should be designated as primary outcome in a clinical trial.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References (80)
- et al.
Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials
J Clin Epidemiol
(2015) - et al.
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction – GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
J Clin Epidemiol
(2011) - et al.
Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
J Clin Epidemiol
(2010) - et al.
Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0
J Clin Epidemiol
(2014) - et al.
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Pain
(2003) - et al.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008
J Clin Epidemiol
(2010) - et al.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties
Osteoarthr Cartil
(2016) - et al.
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
J Pain
(2008) - et al.
Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
Lancet
(2013) - et al.
Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain
J Pain
(2014)
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Pain
Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations
J Pain
OARSI clinical trials recommendations: design and conduct of clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for osteoarthritis
Osteoarthr Cartil
OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: design and conduct of clinical trials for hip osteoarthritis
Osteoarthr Cartil
OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis
Osteoarthr Cartil
Clinical Epidemiology: Principles, Methods, and Applications for Clinical Research
OMERACT conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: introduction
J Rheumatol
Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review
Ann Rheum Dis
Core outcome sets and systematic reviews
Syst Rev
Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
PLoS Med
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias – an updated review
PLOS ONE
Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research
JAMA
Outcomes from the patient perspective workshop at OMERACT 6
J Rheumatol
Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
Trials
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
Trials
OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology
Trials
Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
Syst Rev
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? A survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups
Trials
The COMET (core outcome measures in effectiveness trials) initiative
Trials
Validation and application of a core set of patient-relevant outcome domains to assess the effectiveness of multimodal pain therapy (VAPAIN): a study protocol
BMJ Open
Incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis – progress at OMERACT 7
J Rheumatol
Patient perspective: fatigue as a recommended patient centered outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis
J Rheumatol
What outcomes from pharmacologic treatments are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core set
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set
Trials
MOMENT – Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
Trials
A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey
Trials
Standardised outcomes in nephrology – Haemodialysis (SONG-HD): study protocol for establishing a core outcome set in haemodialysis
Trials
The CONSENSUS study: protocol for a mixed methods study to establish which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for oropharyngeal cancer
Trials
Cited by (58)
Vascular access device type for systemic anti-cancer therapies in cancer patients: A scoping review
2024, Critical Reviews in Oncology/HematologyAssessing the uptake of the type 1 diabetes core outcome set in randomized controlled trials: A Cross-Sectional study
2024, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeMinimal clinical datasets for spine-related musculoskeletal disorders in primary and outpatient care settings: a scoping review
2024, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyMatching the Outcomes to Treatment Targets of Exercise for Low Back Pain: Does it Make a Difference? Results of Secondary Analyses From Individual Patient Data of Randomised Controlled Trials and Pooling of Results Across Trials in Comparative Meta-analysis
2023, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation