Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 85, Issue 7, 1 April 2019, Pages 606-612
Biological Psychiatry

Archival Report
Computational Modeling Applied to the Dot-Probe Task Yields Improved Reliability and Mechanistic Insights

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Biased patterns of attention are implicated as key mechanisms across many forms of psychopathology and have given rise to automated mechanistic interventions designed to modify such attentional preferences. However, progress is substantially hindered by limitations in widely used methods to quantify attention, bias leading to imprecision of measurement.

Methods

In a sample of patients who were clinically anxious (n = 70), we applied a well-validated form of computational modeling (drift-diffusion model) to trial-level reaction time data from a two-choice “dot-probe task”—the dominant paradigm used in hundreds of attention bias studies to date—in order to model distinct components of task performance.

Results

While drift-diffusion model–derived attention bias indices exhibited convergent validity with previous approaches (e.g., conventional bias scores, eye tracking), our novel analytic approach yielded substantially improved split-half reliability, modestly improved test-retest reliability, and revealed novel mechanistic insights regarding neural substrates of attention bias and the impact of an automated attention retraining procedure.

Conclusions

Computational modeling of attention bias task data may represent a new way forward to improve precision.

Section snippets

Methods and Materials

Full methods and primary clinical findings from the randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02303691) have been reported previously (23). In brief, 70 unmedicated patients reporting clinically elevated levels of trait anxiety and associated clinician-rated disability were randomized to receive active ABM (n = 49) or a sham control variant (n = 21). See Supplemental Table S1 for sample characteristics.

Model Fit

DDM models were a good fit for every participant’s datasets (for each assessment point and trial type) according to Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, which assess the probability that empirical and predicted data distributions differ (all p ≥ .59; mean p = .983; SD = .017). Model fits did not differ by trial type, time point, or group (ABM vs. control) (p ≥ .18). Figure 1 illustrates the model fit for the empirical data distribution in a representative subject. See Supplemental Table S3 for descriptive

Discussion

The dot-probe task has been used in many hundreds of studies of affective conditions, spanning both internalizing [e.g., anxiety (7), depression (33), trauma (34), suicidality (35)] and externalizing [e.g., substance use (36), unhealthy eating (37)] conditions. The task assesses the clinically relevant construct of attention bias—or preferential allocation of attention to disorder-relevant stimuli—which is a feature of information processing believed to have wide-reaching effects on the

Acknowledgments and Disclosures

This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Career Development Grant No. K23MH100259 (to RBP).

We gratefully acknowledge Danielle Gilchrist, Logan Cummings, Simona Graur, and the study participants for their contributions to this work.

The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

ClinicalTrials.gov: Attention Bias Modification for Transdiagnostic Anxiety; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02303691?term=NCT02303691&rank=1; NCT02303691

References (42)

  • R.C. Kessler et al.

    Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • Y. Bar-Haim et al.

    Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study

    Psychol Bull

    (2007)
  • C. MacLeod et al.

    The attentional bias modification approach to anxiety intervention

    Clin Psychol Sci

    (2015)
  • R.B. Price et al.

    Empirical recommendations for improving the stability of the dot-probe task in clinical research

    Psychol Assess

    (2015)
  • T.L. Rodebaugh et al.

    Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: the cautionary tale of attentional bias

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2016)
  • A.W. Kruijt et al.

    Capturing dynamics of biased attention: are new attention variability measures the way forward?

    PLoS One

    (2016)
  • R. Ratcliff et al.

    The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks

    Neural Comp

    (2008)
  • A. Voss et al.

    Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction

    Exp Psychol

    (2013)
  • C. MacLeod et al.

    Attentional bias in emotional disorders

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1986)
  • C. White et al.

    Dysphoria and memory for emotional material: A diffusion-model analysis

    Cogn Emot

    (2009)
  • C.N. White et al.

    Anxiety-related threat bias in recognition memory: The moderating effect of list composition and semantic-similarity effects

    Cogn Emot

    (2015)
  • Cited by (53)

    • From Computation to Clinic

      2023, Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text