Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 77, Issue 5, 1 March 2015, Pages 465-474
Biological Psychiatry

Archival Report
Reaction Time Variability and Related Brain Activity in Methamphetamine Psychosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.07.028Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the dynamics of cognitive control instability in methamphetamine (MA) abuse, as well its relationship to substance-induced psychiatric symptoms and drug use patterns.

Methods

We used an ex-Gaussian reaction time (RT) distribution to examine intraindividual variability (IIV) and excessively long RTs (tau) in an individual’s RT on a Stroop task in 30 currently drug-abstinent (3 months to 2 years) MA abusers compared with 27 nonsubstance-abusing control subjects. All subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing the Stroop task, which allowed us to measure the relationship between IIV and tau to functional brain activity.

Results

Elevated IIV in the MA compared with the control group did not reach significance; however, when the MA group was divided into those subjects who had experienced MA-induced psychosis (MAP+) (n = 19) and those who had not (n = 11), the MAP+ group had higher average IIV compared with the other groups (p < .03). In addition, although control subjects displayed a relationship between IIV and conflict-related brain activity in bilateral prefrontal cortex such that increased IIV was associated with increased activity, the MAP+ group displayed this relationship in right prefrontal cortex only, perhaps reflecting elevated vigilance in the MAP+ group. Greater IIV did not correlate with severity of use or months MA abstinent. No group differences emerged in tau values.

Conclusions

These results suggest increased cognitive instability in those MA-dependent subjects who had experienced MA-induced psychosis.

Section snippets

Subjects

Two groups were studied: 30 MA-abusing subjects and 27 nonsubstance-abusing control subjects. Neuroimaging data from this cohort have been previously published, but the analyses employed in the current study are novel and have never been previously reported (77). The MA abusers met DSM-IV criteria for lifetime MA dependence determined from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) (78) but were currently drug abstinent for a minimum of 3 weeks. All MA subjects were interviewed using the

Behavioral Data

Reaction Time Analyses. Analyses revealed main effects of Stroop word type (F1,55 = 140.93, p < .0001) but no group by word type interaction (p = .56). No group differences were observed on within-trial Stroop conflict effects (F < 1) (81). When examining combined IIV and tau, independent samples t tests revealed no significant between-group (MA and control) differences (IIV: t55 = −1.51, p = .14; tau t55 = −1.32, p = .19), suggesting that the MA group as a whole did not differ significantly

Discussion

The current study examined the dynamics of cognitive control instability in MA abusers using a RT distributional analysis. The findings revealed an increase in RT variability in those MA subjects with psychosis compared with both MA abusers without psychosis and control subjects. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find a significant increase in the degree of unusually long RT (i.e., tau) in the MA abusers compared with control subjects. Our results from whole-brain activation analyses

Acknowledgment And Disclosures

This work was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA021847 to RS.

We thank Jerry Sonico for his support and technical assistance with magnetic resonance data collection.

The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

References (103)

  • M.P. Paulus et al.

    Behavioral and functional neuroimaging evidence for prefrontal dysfunction in methamphetamine-dependent subjects

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2002)
  • C. Fassbender et al.

    A lack of default network suppression is linked to increased distractibility in ADHD

    Brain Res

    (2009)
  • M.A. Bellgrove et al.

    The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: Evidence from a response inhibition task

    Neuropsychologia

    (2004)
  • C. Leth-Steensen et al.

    Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: A response time distributional approach

    Acta Psychol (Amst)

    (2000)
  • J.A. Sergeant et al.

    The top and the bottom of ADHD: A neuropsychological perspective

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (2003)
  • S.K. Loo et al.

    Functional effects of the DAT1 polymorphism on EEG measures in ADHD

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • T.P. Tinius

    The intermediate visual and auditory continuous performance test as a neuropsychological measure

    Arch Clin Neuropsychol

    (2003)
  • J. Whyte et al.

    Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury

    Neuropsychologia

    (1995)
  • S. Kaiser et al.

    Intra-individual reaction time variability in schizophrenia, depression and borderline personality disorder

    Brain Cogn

    (2008)
  • R.J. van den Bosch et al.

    Coping and cognition in schizophrenia and depression

    Compr Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • L. Tamm et al.

    Reaction time variability in ADHD: A review

    Neurotherapeutics

    (2012)
  • J.D. Schall et al.

    Neural mechanisms of selection and control of visually guided eye movements

    Neural Netw

    (1998)
  • J.D. Schall

    Neural correlates of decision processes: Neural and mental chronometry

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2003)
  • R.G. Vaurio et al.

    Increased intra-individual reaction time variability in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across response inhibition tasks with different cognitive demands

    Neuropsychologia

    (2009)
  • D.J. Simmonds et al.

    Functional brain correlates of response time variability in children

    Neuropsychologia

    (2007)
  • P.D. Kieffaber et al.

    Switch and maintenance of task set in schizophrenia

    Schizophr Res

    (2006)
  • M. Rentrop et al.

    Intra-individual variability in high-functioning patients with schizophrenia

    Psychiatry Res

    (2010)
  • R. Salo et al.

    Impaired prefrontal cortical function and disrupted adaptive cognitive control in methamphetamine abusers: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • R. Salo et al.

    Behavioral regulation in methamphetamine abusers: An fMRI study

    Psychiatry Res

    (2013)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses

    Neuroimage

    (1999)
  • C. Frith et al.

    The role of the prefrontal cortex in higher cognitive functions

    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res

    (1996)
  • H. Garavan et al.

    Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • J.G. Hakun et al.

    Cognitive control: Preparation of task switching components

    Brain Res

    (2012)
  • E. Koechlin et al.

    An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2007)
  • T.P. Breckel et al.

    Impact of brain networks involved in vigilance on processing irrelevant visual motion

    Neuroimage

    (2011)
  • J.T. Coull et al.

    Monitoring for target objects: Activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task

    Neuropsychologia

    (1998)
  • J.T. Coull et al.

    A fronto-parietal network for rapid visual information processing: A PET study of sustained attention and working memory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1996)
  • J. Lim et al.

    Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: An ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • W. Sturm et al.

    Functional anatomy of intrinsic alertness: Evidence for a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in the right hemisphere

    Neuropsychologia

    (1999)
  • C.K. Chen et al.

    Pre-morbid characteristics and co-morbidity of methamphetamine users with and without psychosis

    Psychol Med

    (2003)
  • R. McKetin et al.

    The prevalence of psychotic symptoms among methamphetamine users

    Addiction

    (2006)
  • M. Sato

    A lasting vulnerability to psychosis in patients with previous methamphetamine psychosis

    Ann N Y Acad Sci

    (1992)
  • G. Dore et al.

    Drug-induced psychosis associated with crystalline methamphetamine

    Australas Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • J. Pasic et al.

    Methamphetamine users in the psychiatric emergency services: A case-control study

    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse

    (2007)
  • M.T. Tsuang et al.

    Genes, environment and schizophrenia

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • C.K. Chen et al.

    Morbid risk for psychiatric disorder among the relatives of methamphetamine users with and without psychosis

    Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet

    (2005)
  • L. Degenhardt et al.

    Methamphetamine: Geographic areas and populations at risk, and emerging evidence for effective interventions

    Drug Alcohol Rev

    (2008)
  • M.A. Schuckit

    Comorbidity between substance use disorders and psychiatric conditions

    Addiction

    (2006)
  • P.A. LeDuc et al.

    Schizophrenia and psychostimulant abuse: A review and re-analysis of clinical evidence

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (1995)
  • P.H. Connell

    Amphetamine Psychosis. BMJ

    (1957)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Does chronic use of amphetamine-type stimulants impair interference control? – A meta-analysis

      2023, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Out of 2,651 entries, 54 relevant reviews and meta-analyses addressing neuropsychological performance in ATS users were identified after a first scan of title and abstract and a second scan of full-text (if accessible). Then, a backward search for eligible studies was conducted by scanning reference lists of these reviews and meta-analyses (Amoroso, 2019; Basterfield et al., 2019; Betzler et al., 2017; Cadet and Bisagno, 2016; Caetano et al., 2021; Canales, 2010; Daiwile et al., 2022; Daldegan-Bueno et al., 2022; Dean et al., 2013; Edinoff et al., 2022; Ersche and Sahakian, 2007; Fattakhov et al., 2021; Fernández-Serrano et al., 2011; Gicas et al., 2022; Gouzoulis-Mayfrank et al., 2002; Guerin et al., 2019; Hall et al., 2018; Harro, 2015; Hart et al., 2012; Kalechstein et al., 2007a; Kassim, 2022; Korpi et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2022; Lyvers, 2006; Mizoguchi and Yamada, 2019; Montgomery and Roberts, 2022; Morgan, 2000; Murphy et al., 2009; Panenka et al., 2013; Pantoni et al., 2022; Parrott, 2013, 2000; Parrott et al., 2014; Potvin et al., 2018; Proebstl et al., 2018; Roberts et al., 2018, 2016b; Rogers et al., 2009; Sabrini et al., 2019; Schifano et al., 2022; Schulz, 2011; Scott et al., 2007; Sharif et al., 2021; Shukla and Vincent, 2021; Sofuoglu, 2010; Strzelecki et al., 2022; Tang et al., 2022; Taylor et al., 2011; Translational Methamphetamine AIDS Research Center (TMARC) Group et al., 2016; van de Blaak and Dumont, 2022; van Holst and Schilt, 2011; Vrajová et al., 2021; Wagner, 2021; Zakzanis et al., 2007). Reviews and meta-analyses were systematically scanned with the following search terms: inhibition, attention, executive, interference, Flanker, Stroop.

    • Intraindividual reaction time variability and academic achievement of primary school students: A longitudinal cross-lagged panel model

      2022, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, when they have poorer attentional control, their responses to task-related goals are less stable, which could be faster, more impulsive responses or slower, more blunted responses that manifest as greater IIRTV (Isbell et al., 2018; Unsworth, 2015). Therefore, a lower IIRTV is thought to reflect smaller attentional fluctuations and better attentional control, whereas a greater IIRTV reflects greater attentional fluctuations and poorer attentional control in children (Adamo, Hodsoll, Asherson, Buitelaar, & Kuntsi, 2019; Fassbender, Lesh, Ursu, & Salo, 2015; Peng et al., 2021; Williams, Thayer, & Koenig, 2016; Zhang, Yang, Liu, Lu, & Wang, 2020). Compared to other indicators, such as mean reaction time or mean accuracy on cognitive tasks, IIRTV can better reflect the consistencies and fluctuations of attentional resource allocation in children; therefore, it may be a better indicator of the efficiency of attentional processes (Cubillo et al., 2022; Isbell et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text