Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 69, Issue 3, 1 February 2011, Pages 260-265
Biological Psychiatry

Archival Report
Remember the Future: Working Memory Training Decreases Delay Discounting Among Stimulant Addicts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.017Get rights and content

Background

Excessive discounting of future rewards has been observed in a variety of disorders and has been linked both to valuation of the past and to memory of past events.

Methods

To explore the functionality of discounting and memory, we examined whether training of working memory would result in less discounting of future rewards. In this study, 27 adults in treatment for stimulant use were randomly assigned to receive either working memory training or control training according to a yoked experimental design. Measures of delay discounting and several other cognitive behaviors were assessed pre- and posttraining.

Results

Rates of discounting of delayed rewards were significantly reduced among those who received memory training but were unchanged among those who received control training; other cognitive assessments were not affected by memory training. Discount rates were positively correlated with memory training performance measures.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that neurocognitive training on working memory decreases delay discounting. These results offer further evidence of a functional relationship between delay discounting and working memory.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty-seven participants (20 male, seven female, mean age = 38.6 years) being treated for stimulant use at a substance-abuse treatment facility enrolled and completed all assessments. Stimulant abuse/dependence diagnosis was determined by clinical staff at the treatment facility using criteria established by the DSM-IV-TR (25) and documented to be consistent with the findings from aspects of Addiction Severity Index—5th Edition administered to all individuals in the facility as a component of

Results

Active and control training groups did not statistically differ on any demographic variables. Because of a marginal nonsignificant difference between the mean ages of the two groups (35.7 for active vs. 41.6 for control, t25 = 1.89, p = .070), age was included as a covariate in subsequent analyses. When it was found not to affect inferences, age as a covariate was dropped from the final models.

Discussion

This study suggests that working memory training among stimulant-dependent individuals results in a decrease in discounting of delayed rewards consistent with previous reports of a relationship between working memory and delay discounting. This effect of training working memory was selective and did not affect any other pre- and posttraining measures. Moreover, the absence of any significant effects in the control group indicates that these effects are not related to attention, exposure to the

References (42)

  • W.K. Bickel et al.

    Toward the study of trans-disease processes: A novel approach with special reference to the study of co-morbidity

    J Dual Diagn

    (2009)
  • R. Yi et al.

    Discounting of past outcomes

    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol

    (2006)
  • M.R. Dixon et al.

    Altering the magnitude of delay discounting by pathological gamblers

    J Appl Behav Anal

    (2009)
  • D. Hassabis et al.

    Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2007)
  • L. Bobova et al.

    Disinhibitory psychopathology and delay discounting in alcohol dependence: Personality and cognitive correlates

    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol

    (2009)
  • N.A. Shamosh et al.

    Individual differences in delay discounting: Relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex

    Psychol Sci

    (2008)
  • H. Rachlin

    The Science of Self-Control

    (2000)
  • Y. Trope et al.

    Temporal construal

    Psychol Review

    (2003)
  • L. Krabbendam et al.

    Cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia: A quantitative analysis of controlled studies

    Psychopharmacology

    (2003)
  • E.W. Twamley et al.

    A review of cognitive training in schizophrenia

    Schizophr Bull

    (2003)
  • A. Ardila et al.

    Neuropsychological deficits in chronic cocaine abusers

    Int J Neurosci

    (1991)
  • Cited by (524)

    • From Computation to Clinic

      2023, Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text