Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 60, Issue 7, 1 October 2006, Pages 722-729
Biological Psychiatry

Original article
Stress-Induced Deficits in Working Memory and Visuo-Constructive Abilities in Special Operations Soldiers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.021Get rights and content

Background

Pre-clinical and clinical studies have shown acute stress may impair working memory and visuo-spatial ability. This study was designed to clarify the nature of stress-induced cognitive deficits in soldiers and how such deficits may contribute to operational or battlefield errors.

Methods

One hundred eighty-four Special Operations warfighters enrolled in Survival School completed pre-stress measures of dissociation and trauma exposure. Subjects were randomized to one of three assessment groups (Pre-stress, Stress, Post-stress) and were administered the Rey Ostereith Complex Figure (ROCF). All subjects completed post-stress measures of dissociation.

Results

ROCF copy and recall were normal in the Pre- and Post-stress groups. ROCF copy and recall were significantly impaired in the Stress Group. Stress group ROCF copy performance was piecemeal, and ROCF recall was impaired. Symptoms of dissociation were negatively associated with ROCF recall in the Stress group. Baseline dissociation and history of traumatic stress predicted cognitive impairment during stress.

Conclusions

Stress exposure impaired visuo-spatial capacity and working memory. In rats, monkeys, and humans, high dopamine and NE turnover in the PFC induce deficits in cognition and spatial working memory. Improved understanding of stress-induced cognitive deficits may assist in identification of soldiers at risk and lead to the development of better countermeasures.

Section snippets

Subjects in the Study

A total of 184 of 200 consecutively recruited male, active duty personnel [mean age 23 years, standard deviation (SD) = 4.1] were the subjects of this study. One hundred thirty subjects (69.9%) were single, and 54 (29%) were married. Overall, 166 subjects were men; 18 were women. As designated by their military operational specialty, 92 subjects were Navy pilots, 14 subjects were Marine aviators, and 78 were air wing support personnel. Recruitment of subjects was conducted by the investigators

ROCF Copy Data

The mean ROCF Copy scores for the Pre-stress, Stress, and Post-stress groups were 35.8, 33.4, and 35.4, respectively. General linear model univariate ANOVA indicated there was a significant effect of group (F(1,2) = 52.04; p < .000). Post hoc analyses (Tukey) indicated that this effect was due to a significantly lower ROCF Copy score in the Stress group (mean difference between Stress and Pre-stress group = 2.40 [standard error (SE) = .25]; p < .001; mean difference between Stress group and

Discussion

Performance on the ROCF was within the normal range for the pre-stress and post-stress groups. However, exposure to realistic levels of acute stress resulted in significant alterations in both ROCF copy procedure and ROCF recall scores. Contrary to our hypothesis, nearly all subjects exhibited abnormalities in visuo-constructive abilities when copying the Rey figure immediately after stress exposure. The piecemeal strategy used by these adults resembles that observed in pre-pubescent children

References (44)

  • C.A. Morgan et al.

    Neuropeptide-Y, cortisol and subjective distress in humans exposed to acute stress: Replication and extension of a previous report

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • C.A. Morgan et al.

    Toward a pharmacology of acute stress disorders

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • C.A. Morgan et al.

    Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress

    Int J Psychiatry Law

    (2004)
  • R.G. Poulton et al.

    The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test: Norms for young adolescents and an examination of validity

    Arch Clin Neuropsychol

    (1995)
  • S.M. Southwick et al.

    Role of norepinephrine in the pathophysiology and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder

    Biol Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • A.F.T. Arnsten

    Catecholamine regulation of pre-frontal cortex

    J Psychopharmacol

    (1997)
  • A.F.T. Arnsten

    The biology of being frazzled

    Science

    (1998)
  • G. Aston Jones et al.

    Locus coeruleus, stress, and PTSD: Neurobiological and clinical parallels

  • A.D. Baddeley

    Working Memory

    (1986)
  • G. Belenky et al.

    Sustaining Performance during Continuous Operations: The US Army’s Sleep Management System

  • D.T.R. Berry et al.

    Rey-Ostereith figure: Psychometric characteristics in a geriatric sample

    Clin Neuropsychol

    (1991)
  • J.D. Bremner et al.

    Measurement of dissociative states with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS)

    J Traumatic Stress

    (1998)
  • Cited by (137)

    • Time-dependent effects of acute stress on working memory performance: A systematic review and hypothesis

      2023, Psychoneuroendocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      After removing duplicates from the initial search, we included n = 1182 articles into a database. For a study to be analyzed, it had to fulfill several criteria: (1) the time-interval between stressor offset and working-memory task onset had to be unambiguously reported, (2) it had to have used the a variant of the TSST, MAST or (SE) CPT as stressor because both those paradigms are known to trigger a reliable hormonal stress response (Goodman et al., 2017; Schwabe et al., 2008, 2012), (3) had demonstrated a significant rise in cortisol after stressor or significantly higher cortisol levels post-stressor in the stress compared to a control group to ensure the stress manipulation had actually worked, and (4) used only an n-back or some form of span task (this includes forward- and backward-span tasks as well as letter-number-sequencing and Corsi tasks) as these more narrowly capture working memory capacity than does, for example, the math performance (e.g. Al’Absi et al., 2002; Gärtner et al., 2015) or ray-ostrich complex figures (Morgan et al., 2006). Twenty-six studies fulfilled these criteria and three additional investigations that matched our inclusion criteria were identified via a more explorative GoogleScholar™ and backwards search, resulting in a total sample of 28 studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text