Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 57, Issue 4, 15 February 2005, Pages 319-327
Biological Psychiatry

Original articles
Toward an objective characterization of an anhedonic phenotype: A signal-detection approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.026Get rights and content

Background

Difficulties in defining and characterizing phenotypes has hindered progress in psychiatric genetics and clinical neuroscience. Decreased approach-related behavior and anhedonia (lack of responsiveness to pleasure) are considered cardinal features of depression, but few studies have used laboratory-based measures to objectively characterize these constructs.

Methods

To assess hedonic capacity in relation to depressive, particularly anhedonic, symptoms, 62 participants completed a signal-detection task based on a differential reinforcement schedule. Anhedonia was operationalized as decreased reward responsiveness.

Results

Unequal frequency of reward between two correct responses produced a response bias (i.e., a systematic preference to identify the stimulus paired with the more frequent reward). Subjects with elevated depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory scores ≥ 16) failed to show a response bias. Impaired reward responsiveness predicted higher anhedonic symptoms 1 month later, after controlling for general negative affectivity.

Conclusions

Impaired tendency to modulate behavior as a function of prior reinforcement might underline diminished hedonic capacity in depression. When applied to a clinical population, objective assessments of participants’ propensity to modulate behavior as a function of reward might provide a powerful tool for improving the phenotypic definition of depression and thus offer a reliable behavioral screening approach for neuroscience studies of depression.

Section snippets

Participants

Informed written consent was obtained from 62 undergraduate students (23 men, 39 women; aged 20.13 ± 2.50 years [mean ± SD]) recruited from introductory psychology courses at Harvard University. All participants were right-handed (Chapman and Chapman 1987), reported to be free of any past or present neurologic illness, and received either course credit or $5 for their participation. (Exploratory analyses revealed no differences in task performance, including response bias, between participants

Accuracy

The two-way ANOVA with Block and Condition as factors revealed a main effect of Condition [F(1,61) = 29.50, p < .001 (partial η2: .33)] and a significant Block × Condition interaction [F(2,122) = 4.43, p < .020 (ε: .87; partial η2: .07)]. As expected, accuracy for the rich condition was higher than for the lean condition (Figure 2A), and this difference increased over time [linear contrast of the interaction: F(1,61) = 5.98, p < .020]. Post hoc Newman-Keuls tests clarified that accuracy for the

Discussion

Rooted within a classic view that a stimulus is rewarding if it positively reinforces behavior (i.e., it reliably increases the likelihood of behavior [Hull 1943; Rescorla and Wagner 1972]), the goals of the present study were 1) to test the feasibility, convergent validity, and predictive validity of a laboratory-based measure of hedonic capacity based on a signal-detection approach; and 2) to test the hypothesis that elevated levels of depressive, particularly anhedonic, symptoms were

References (57)

  • R. Spanagel et al.

    The dopamine hypothesis of rewardPast and current status

    Trends Neurosci

    (1999)
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1994)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck Depression Inventory Manual

    (1996)
  • H. Berenbaum et al.

    Emotional experience and expression in schizophrenia and depression

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1992)
  • A.M. Buchwald

    Depressive mood and estimates of reinforcement frequency

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1977)
  • L.J. Chapman et al.

    Scales for physical and social anhedonia

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1976)
  • L.J. Chapman et al.

    Physical anhedonia, perceptual aberration and psychosis proneness

    Schizophr Bull

    (1980)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    PsyScopeA new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments

    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput

    (1993)
  • R.J. Davidson

    Anterior electrophysiological asymmetries, emotion, and depressionConceptual and methodological conundrums

    Psychophysiology

    (1998)
  • R.A. Depue et al.

    Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders

    Annu Rev Psychol

    (1989)
  • J. Fawcett et al.

    Differences between anhedonic and normally hedonic depressive states

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1983)
  • E.R. Fiorito et al.

    Emotional imagery and physical anhedonia

    Psychophysiology

    (1994)
  • I.H. Gotlib

    Self-reinforcement and depression in interpersonal interactionThe role of performance level

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1982)
  • I.H. Gotlib et al.

    Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and cognitive functioning

    Cognition Emotion

    (1998)
  • I.I. Gottesman et al.

    The endophenotype concept in psychiatryEtymology and strategic intentions

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • D. Green et al.

    Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics

    (1966)
  • G. Hasler et al.

    Discovering endophenotypes for major depression

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2004)
  • J.B. Henriques et al.

    Left frontal hypoactivation in depression

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (537)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text