Multi-Informant Assessments of Adolescent Social Anxiety: Adding Clarity by Leveraging Reports from Unfamiliar Peer Confederates
Section snippets
Purpose and hypotheses
The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on multi-informant approaches to assessing adolescent SA. We tested five hypotheses among a mixed clinical/community sample of adolescents, their parents, and peer confederates who interacted with adolescents during a 20-minute mock social interaction period. First, we expected to observe levels of correspondence among adolescent, parent, and peer confederate SA reports that were consistent with prior work (i.e., rs in the .20s to .40s;
participants
Participants included 89 adolescent-parent dyads who completed the measures described below as part of a larger study conducted at a large mid-Atlantic university. Parents contacted the laboratory in response to one of two different advertisements. These advertisements offered either a no-cost clinical assessment to adolescents for whom their parent expressed interest on their behalf for a clinical SA screening evaluation (i.e., Evaluation-Seeking Adolescents), or participation in a study
preliminary analyses
We conducted preliminary analyses to test if our data met assumptions for planned parametric analyses (i.e., skewness/kurtosis in range of + 2.0). Frequency distributions for all variables used in analyses reported below were examined to assess normality. Scores for all measures with the exception of BDI-II reports fell within acceptable ranges of skewness and kurtosis. Specifically, adolescent self-reports and parent reports about adolescents on the BDI-II exhibited relatively high positive
main findings
The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on multi-informant approaches to assessing adolescent SA. We discovered five findings. First, we observed varying levels of correspondence among adolescent, parent, and peer confederate reports. Adolescent reports correlated with parent reports in the .30s and correlated in the .40s to .50s with peer confederate reports. Parent and peer confederate reports correlated in the .07 to .22 range. We observed significantly larger magnitudes of
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
References (53)
- et al.
The relationship among social phobia, objective and perceived physiological reactivity, and anxiety sensitivity in an adolescent population
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2009) - et al.
Social skills and social phobia: An investigation of DSM-IV subtypes
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2010) - et al.
A symptom-level examination of parent-child agreement in the diagnosis of anxious youths
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1998) - et al.
Correction for multiple testing: Is there a resolution?
Chest
(2011) - et al.
Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity
Psychological Bulletin
(1987) - et al.
Social anxiety in adolescents and young adults: Translating developmental science into practice
(2011) - et al.
Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis
Psychological Bulletin
(1992) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(2013)When to use the Bonferroni correction
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
(2014)
Stability of anxious symptomatology in children
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Behavioral treatment of childhood social phobia
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention
School Psychology Quarterly
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
A procedure for the assessment of social skills: the Simulated Social Interaction Test
Introduction to the special issue: Toward implementing physiological measures in clinical child and adolescent assessments
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Implementing psychophysiology in clinical assessments of adolescent social anxiety: Use of rater judgments based on graphical representations of psychophysiology
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health
Psychological Bulletin
Graphical representations of adolescents’ psychophysiological reactivity to social stressor tasks: Reliability and validity of the Chernoff Face approach and person-centered profiles for clinical use
Psychological Assessment
Adolescent self-reports of social anxiety: Can they disagree with objective psychophysiological measures and still be valid?
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
The relations among measurements of informant discrepancies within a multisite trial of treatments for childhood social phobia
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Are clinicians’ assessments of improvements in children’s functioning “global”?
Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Informant discrepancies in adult social anxiety disorder assessments: Links with contextual variations in observed behavior
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Linking informant discrepancies to observed variations in young children’s disruptive behavior
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Measuring informant discrepancies in clinical child research
Psychological Assessment
Cited by (48)
Assessing Peer-Related Impairments Linked to Adolescent Social Anxiety: Strategic Selection of Informants Optimizes Prediction of Clinically Relevant Domains
2023, Behavior TherapyCitation Excerpt :Informants (i.e., adolescents, parents, peer confederates) rated each statement on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 4 (extremely characteristic or true of me). When used to assess adolescents, informants’ reports on the SIAS display high levels of internal consistency (α > .90) and distinguish adolescents on referral status (Deros et al., 2018). Further, informants’ SIAS reports relate to observed social skills (Glenn et al., 2019).
When Adolescents Experience Co-Occurring Social Anxiety and ADHD Symptoms: Links With Social Skills When Interacting With Unfamiliar Peer Confederates
2022, Behavior TherapyCitation Excerpt :First, the peer confederates who participated in the Unfamiliar Peer Paradigm were undergraduate and postbaccalaureate personnel trained to simulate unfamiliar, same-age peers. As in prior work using the same or similar paradigms (Anderson & Hope, 2009; Deros et al., 2018), only personnel who appeared youthful and could reasonably “stand in” as same-age, unfamiliar peers (e.g., wearing age-appropriate casual clothing, absence of facial hair for male confederates) posed as peer confederates in these studies. Nevertheless, peer confederates were a different age relative to our study participants.
Informant Reports in Clinical Assessment
2022, Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Second Edition