Elsevier

Behavior Therapy

Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 84-98
Behavior Therapy

Multi-Informant Assessments of Adolescent Social Anxiety: Adding Clarity by Leveraging Reports from Unfamiliar Peer Confederates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.05.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Adolescent social anxiety assessments often include adolescent and parent reports

  • Low adolescent-parent correspondence makes clinical decision-making difficult

  • Assessments would benefit from informants who observe adolescents specifically within interactions with unfamiliar peers

  • We tested the incremental value of reports from unfamiliar peer confederates

  • Findings have broad implications for increasing interpretability of adolescent social anxiety assessments

Abstract

Adolescent social anxiety (SA) assessments often include adolescent and parent reports, and low reporting correspondence results in uncertainties in clinical decision-making. Adolescents display SA within non-home contexts such as peer interactions. Yet, current methods for collecting peer reports raise confidentiality concerns, though adolescent SA assessments nonetheless would benefit from context-specific reports relevant to adolescent SA (i.e., interactions with unfamiliar peers). In a sample of 89 adolescents (30 Evaluation-Seeking; 59 Community Control), we collected SA reports from adolescents and their parents, and SA reports from unfamiliar peer confederates who interacted with adolescents during 20-minute mock social interactions. Adolescents and parents completed reports on trait measures of adolescent SA and related concerns (e.g., depressive symptoms), and adolescents completed self-reports of state arousal within mock social interactions. Adolescents’ SA reports correlated with reports on parallel measures from parents in the .30s and with peer confederates in the .40s to .50s, whereas reports from parent-confederate dyads correlated in the .07 to .22 range. Adolescent, parent, and peer confederate SA reports related to reports on trait measures of adolescent SA and depressive symptoms, and distinguished Evaluation-Seeking from Community Control Adolescents. Confederates’ SA reports incrementally predicted adolescents’ self-reported SA over and above parent reports, and vice versa, with combined Rs ranging from .51 to .60. These combined Rs approximate typical correspondence levels between informants who observe adolescents in the same context (e.g., mother-father). Adolescent and peer confederate (but not parent) SA reports predicted adolescents’ state arousal in social interactions. These findings have implications for clarifying patterns of reporting correspondence in clinical assessments of adolescent SA.

Section snippets

Purpose and hypotheses

The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on multi-informant approaches to assessing adolescent SA. We tested five hypotheses among a mixed clinical/community sample of adolescents, their parents, and peer confederates who interacted with adolescents during a 20-minute mock social interaction period. First, we expected to observe levels of correspondence among adolescent, parent, and peer confederate SA reports that were consistent with prior work (i.e., rs in the .20s to .40s;

participants

Participants included 89 adolescent-parent dyads who completed the measures described below as part of a larger study conducted at a large mid-Atlantic university. Parents contacted the laboratory in response to one of two different advertisements. These advertisements offered either a no-cost clinical assessment to adolescents for whom their parent expressed interest on their behalf for a clinical SA screening evaluation (i.e., Evaluation-Seeking Adolescents), or participation in a study

preliminary analyses

We conducted preliminary analyses to test if our data met assumptions for planned parametric analyses (i.e., skewness/kurtosis in range of + 2.0). Frequency distributions for all variables used in analyses reported below were examined to assess normality. Scores for all measures with the exception of BDI-II reports fell within acceptable ranges of skewness and kurtosis. Specifically, adolescent self-reports and parent reports about adolescents on the BDI-II exhibited relatively high positive

main findings

The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on multi-informant approaches to assessing adolescent SA. We discovered five findings. First, we observed varying levels of correspondence among adolescent, parent, and peer confederate reports. Adolescent reports correlated with parent reports in the .30s and correlated in the .40s to .50s with peer confederate reports. Parent and peer confederate reports correlated in the .07 to .22 range. We observed significantly larger magnitudes of

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References (53)

  • D.C. Beidel et al.

    Stability of anxious symptomatology in children

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1996)
  • D.C. Beidel et al.

    Behavioral treatment of childhood social phobia

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2000)
  • N.A. Card et al.

    Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention

    School Psychology Quarterly

    (2008)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

    (1988)
  • J.P. Curran

    A procedure for the assessment of social skills: the Simulated Social Interaction Test

  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Introduction to the special issue: Toward implementing physiological measures in clinical child and adolescent assessments

    Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

    (2015)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Implementing psychophysiology in clinical assessments of adolescent social anxiety: Use of rater judgments based on graphical representations of psychophysiology

    Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

    (2015)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2015)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Graphical representations of adolescents’ psychophysiological reactivity to social stressor tasks: Reliability and validity of the Chernoff Face approach and person-centered profiles for clinical use

    Psychological Assessment

    (2017)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Adolescent self-reports of social anxiety: Can they disagree with objective psychophysiological measures and still be valid?

    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

    (2012)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    The relations among measurements of informant discrepancies within a multisite trial of treatments for childhood social phobia

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2010)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Are clinicians’ assessments of improvements in children’s functioning “global”?

    Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

    (2011)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Informant discrepancies in adult social anxiety disorder assessments: Links with contextual variations in observed behavior

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (2013)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports

    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

    (2013)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Linking informant discrepancies to observed variations in young children’s disruptive behavior

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2009)
  • A. De Los Reyes et al.

    Measuring informant discrepancies in clinical child research

    Psychological Assessment

    (2004)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Assessing Peer-Related Impairments Linked to Adolescent Social Anxiety: Strategic Selection of Informants Optimizes Prediction of Clinically Relevant Domains

      2023, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Informants (i.e., adolescents, parents, peer confederates) rated each statement on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 4 (extremely characteristic or true of me). When used to assess adolescents, informants’ reports on the SIAS display high levels of internal consistency (α > .90) and distinguish adolescents on referral status (Deros et al., 2018). Further, informants’ SIAS reports relate to observed social skills (Glenn et al., 2019).

    • When Adolescents Experience Co-Occurring Social Anxiety and ADHD Symptoms: Links With Social Skills When Interacting With Unfamiliar Peer Confederates

      2022, Behavior Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, the peer confederates who participated in the Unfamiliar Peer Paradigm were undergraduate and postbaccalaureate personnel trained to simulate unfamiliar, same-age peers. As in prior work using the same or similar paradigms (Anderson & Hope, 2009; Deros et al., 2018), only personnel who appeared youthful and could reasonably “stand in” as same-age, unfamiliar peers (e.g., wearing age-appropriate casual clothing, absence of facial hair for male confederates) posed as peer confederates in these studies. Nevertheless, peer confederates were a different age relative to our study participants.

    • Informant Reports in Clinical Assessment

      2022, Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text