A Taxometric Investigation of the Latent Structure of Worry: Dimensionality and Associations With Depression, Anxiety, and Stress
Section snippets
Participants
Participants consisted of a community sample of 1,507 individuals (87% Caucasian). Of the 1,507 participants who were recruited for the study, 152 had to be excluded from these analyses due to missing data, which resulted in a final sample of 1,355 males (48%) and females (52%) ranging in age from 18 to 78 (M = 33.52, SD = 12.57).
Worry-Related Measures
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer et al., 1990) is a commonly used 16-item measure of a person's overall tendency to experience worry. Participants respond
Participants
Participants consisted of 1,220 undergraduate students who completed a series of worry questionnaires (83% Caucasian). Of the 1,220 participants who were recruited for the study, 49 had to be excluded from these analyses due to missing data. Thus, the final sample consisted of 1,171 male (n = 322) and female (n = 849) students ranging in age from 18 to 41 (M = 20.15, SD = 2.01).
Worry-Related Measures
Given that Study 1 consisted of very specific measures of worry, our goal in Study 2 was to build on the findings of Study 1
Discussion
Consistent with Study 1, the findings from Study 2 produced converging evidence in support of the conclusion that the latent structure of worry is dimensional. Building on prior research, Study 2 also examined the relationship between the dimension of worry and various psychopathological symptoms. The findings suggest that worry is equally associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress across all points of the worry continuum. However, there was some evidence that the relationship
General Discussion
Several studies have observed that worry is associated with a range of psychological (Barlow, 2002, Borkovec et al., 1998) and physical (Hazlett-Stevens, Craske, Mayer, Chang, & Naliboff, 2003) disorders. A review of the literature suggests that distinctions have been made between normal and pathological worry (Roemer et al., 1997). However, it remains unclear if these categorical distinctions reflect the true latent structure of worry. In Study 1, a sample of community participants completed
Author Note
The authors would like to thank Michele A. Schottenbauer, Benjamin F. Rodriguez, Carol R. Glass, and Diane B. Arnkoff for their assistance with data collection for Study 1.
References (57)
- et al.
The effect of worry on cardiovascular response to phobic imagery
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1990) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects?
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2003)- et al.
Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Differences between African-American and White-American college students
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2005) - et al.
Pathological worry in depressed and anxious patients
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2003) - et al.
Qualitative dimensions of worry in DSM-1I1-R generalized anxiety disorder subjects and nonanxious controls
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1989) - et al.
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2002) - et al.
Why do people worry?
Personality and Individual Differences
(1994) - et al.
Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome among university students: the roles of worry, neuroticism, anxiety sensitivity, and visceral anxiety
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2003) - et al.
Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: A study of a theoretical model of worry
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2000) - et al.
The contributory role of worry in emotion generation and dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2007)
Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
Behaviour Research and Therapy
The structure of worry: Relations between positive/negative personality characteristics and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
The nature of intrusive thoughts
Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Cognitive and personality characteristics of worriers
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Delimiting the boundaries of generalized anxiety disorder: Differentiating high worriers with and without GAD
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Experience and appraisal of worry among high worriers with and without generalized anxiety disorder
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Worry and eating disorders: A psychopathological association
Eating Behaviors
Mixed anxiety depression: Taxometric exploration of the validity of a diagnostic category
Journal of Affective Disorders
Pathological worry in major depression: A preliminary report
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Pathological worry, anxiety disorders and the impact of co-occurrence with depressive and other anxiety disorders
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Correlates of illness worry in chronic fatigue syndrome
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Age differences in the experience of worry
Journal of Mental Health and Aging
Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic
The nature, functions, and origins of worry
Avoidance theory of worry and generalized anxiety disorder
Worry: A cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to affective, physiological, and interpersonal behavioral processes
Cognitive Therapy and Research
The nature of normal and pathological worry
Cited by (81)
The dysregulation of top-down control in individuals with high test anxiety: A resting state fMRI study
2022, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchDecentering predicts attenuated perseverative thought and internalizing symptoms following stress exposure: A multi-level, multi-wave study
2022, Behaviour Research and TherapyReward-Related Neural Circuitry in Depressed and Anxious Adolescents: A Human Connectome Project
2022, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :More broadly, it suggests that reward alterations may reflect a common factor in psychopathology given known etiological roles in other mental disorders including substance use, bipolar disorder, and psychosis,92 which is consistent with recent research that has identified transdiagnostic neurofunctional markers associated with disruptions in emotional processing.93 Increasingly, taxometric research has demonstrated that examining internalizing disorders as dimensional constructs as opposed to discrete categories defined by the DSM could aid research and treatment.94-98 Accordingly, recent psychotherapeutic approaches are modifying targets to align with this shift.