18Quality of life and recovery after graft-versus-host disease
Section snippets
Health-related quality of life after HCT
Health-related QOL (HRQL) has been fairly well studied after transplantation, but there have been several limitations to the studies that make definitive conclusions difficult to reach. First, there have been no uniform standardized QOL assessment tools or methods of analysis that have been utilized in most published data. Second, there is heterogeneity in patient populations studied such that some studies include a wide range of ages, some include recipients of both allogeneic as well as
Acute GVHD and QOL
Lee and colleagues8 studied the impact of both acute and chronic GVHD on HRQL and found that the trial outcome index (TOI) score obtained from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-BMT survey was a sensitive indicator regarding the impact of GVHD on a patient's perceived QOL. Patients who had acute GHVD had a measurable decline in their QOL over the first 6 months after HCT compared to those with no acute GVHD who had a stable QOL. However, this adverse impact from acute GVHD did
Risk factors for adverse QOL: pediatric studies
Several studies have specifically examined the impact of HCT on QOL in children. These studies have their own limitations, particularly in the validity of parental report of QOL as a surrogate marker in younger children, and variations between studies in the length of follow-up and types of HCT performed.
To address the variance between parental versus self-report of QOL, Nuss and colleagues surveyed the child as well as the mother and father.11 This study utilized the Pediatric Quality of Life
Impact of chronic GVHD
Few studies have specifically examined the overall impact of chronic GVHD on patients after HCT. We have examined this in the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study (BMT-SS), a collaborative effort between the City of Hope Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota that is examining the long-term outcomes of individuals who have survived ≥2 years after undergoing HCT. Participants of the BMT-SS included individuals who received HCT for hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies and other
Functional outcomes
While many studies have focused specifically on issues related to QOL, few have addressed the issue of overall health status and recovery in patients who have had chronic GVHD. Again from the BMT-SS, we have recently reported such an analysis to determine the impact of chronic GVHD on the overall health status of HCT recipients.17 The outcomes that were addressed in this analysis included six domains of health status that had been previously reported from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study18,
Recovery
As seen in many studies, the majority of HCT survivors will be physically able to function well by 1 year post-HCT, but this is impacted by pre-transplant level of physical performance, family relationships, and chronic GVHD.19 However, it has been demonstrated that recovery continues beyond the first year and return to full-time work or school may still require a longer period of recovery. Most have returned to full-time school or occupations by 2 years.19
A multidisciplinary approach to the
Considerations for QOL measurement in survivors with GVHD
It has been demonstrated that patients who suffer from chronic GVHD will experience a significant negative impact on QOL and their functional status. Accurately capturing this information will be crucial to the success of future trials of chronic GVHD therapy. As mentioned previously, the use of common assessment tools will aid in the overall understanding of these issues across different studies and patient populations. Recently recommended as ‘consensus tools’ were the Medical Outcomes Study
Conclusions
Chronic GVHD is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in HCT survivors. Management of patients with cGVHD is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach to address the physical and psychological consequences of the disease and its treatment. Response to therapy is suboptimal, and there is an urgent need for systematic study of agents to be used as primary therapy and in the salvage setting. Such studies will be possible only if consensus can be reached regarding meaningful grading
References (25)
- et al.
Nonmalignant late effects after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Blood
(2003) - et al.
Severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease: association with treatment-related mortality and relapse
Blood
(2002) - et al.
Effect of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on 3-year disease-free survival in recipients of unrelated donor bone marrow (T-cell Depletion Trial): a multi-centre, randomised phase II-III trial
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
The effect of unrelated donor marrow transplantation on health-related quality of life: a report of the unrelated donor marrow transplantation trial (T-cell depletion trial)
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
(2006) - et al.
Late effects in survivors of chronic myeloid leukemia treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation: results from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study
Blood
(2004) - et al.
Impact of chronic graft-versus-host disease on the health status of hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors: a report from the Bone Marrow Transplant Survivor Study
Blood
(2006) - et al.
Development and validation of a scale to measure symptoms of chronic graft-versus-host disease
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
(2002) - et al.
Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model
Social Science & Medicine
(1999) - et al.
Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Late Effects Working Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry
The New England Journal of Medicine
(1999) - et al.
Organ toxicity and quality of life after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in pediatric patients: a single centre retrospective analysis
Bone Marrow Transplantation
(1999)
Acute health-related quality of life in children undergoing stem cell transplant: I. Descriptive outcomes
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Quality of life in 244 recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
British Journal of Haematology
Cited by (48)
Extracorporeal Photopheresis as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2023, Transplantation and Cellular TherapyCoping and Modifiable Psychosocial Factors are Associated with Mood and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease
2019, Biology of Blood and Marrow TransplantationRandomized controlled study of ECP with methoxsalen as first-line treatment of patients with moderate to severe cGVHD
2019, Blood AdvancesCitation Excerpt :Reduced QoL is increasingly recognized as an important feature of GVHD and one that requires greater understanding to address the overall impact on patients.11 In observational studies, almost a third of patients, having undergone HSCT, were considered to have poor QoL, and significant differences were typically observed in patients with moderate or severe GVHD.8,12-15 Improvements in QoL have been observed over time in patients following HSCT, but only in those patients without cGVHD.16
The Association of Performance Status and Disease Severity in Patients With Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease
2019, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVulvovaginal Graft-Versus-Host Disease
2017, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North AmericaAlpharetroviral self-inactivating vectors produced by a superinfection-resistant stable packaging cell line allow genetic modification of primary human T lymphocytes
2016, BiomaterialsCitation Excerpt :Elimination of patient leukemic cells, termed graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL), is based on allo-reactive T lymphocytes present in the donor graft or infused after HSCT (donor lymphocyte infusion, DLI). However, curative GVL of allo-reactive donor lymphocytes correlates with the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a frequent, life-threatening adverse event and the major cause of non-relapsed mortality after allo-HSCT [6]. The high risk of GvHD in allogeneic transplantation settings and the occurrence of off-target and/or on-target/off-tumor activities of otherwise tumor-specific T lymphocytes in cancer treatment have underlined the strong need for safety strategies to specifically and conditionally eliminate infused T lymphocytes.