Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 75, Issue 1, February 2011, Pages 18-28
Brain and Cognition

Distortions and disconnections: Disrupted brain connectivity in autism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2010.10.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The past few years have seen considerable interest in findings of abnormal brain connectivity in the autism spectrum disorders (ASD). We review recent work from neuroimaging and other sources, and argue that there is considerable convergent evidence suggesting that connectivity is disrupted in ASD. We point to evidence both of local over-connectivity and of long-distance under-connectivity, and describe some non-uniformities in this picture, most notably that disruptions appear more severe in later-developing cortical regions. We conclude by discussing a number of extant questions. Firstly, we consider whether aberrant connectivity should be seen as part of the primary pathogenesis of autism, or whether disrupted connectivity in ASD emerges over time. Secondly, we consider how the patterns of disrupted connectivity found in ASD might relate to those being found in a range of other disorders.

Introduction

The autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders characterized by deficits in social interaction, communication, and stereotyped or repetitive behaviors (APA, 1994). Although the first report of functional under-connectivity in ASD came from Horwitz, Rumsey, Grady, and Rapoport (1988) it is only in recent years that the study of connectivity in ASD has attracted widespread attention (although see also Brock et al., 2002, Carpenter et al., 2001, Castelli et al., 2002, Rubenstein and Merzenich, 2003). Just, Cherkassky, Keller, and Minshew (2004) provided an influential formulation of what they dubbed “under-connectivity theory”, arguing that “autism is a cognitive and neurobiological disorder marked and caused by under-functioning integrative circuitry that results in a deficit of integration of information at the neural and cognitive levels”. In recent years, under-connectivity theory has attracted considerable attention as a number of studies have reported lower than expected between-region functional correlations on a range of tasks (e.g. Koshino et al., 2008), and DTI has revealed markers of disordered structural connectivity in individuals with ASD (e.g. Sundaram et al., 2008).

Belmonte et al. (2004) provided an important addendum to the Just et al. paper. They noted that whereas some authors discuss ASD as a problem of under-connectivity (Brock et al., 2002, Just et al., 2004), others treat the problem as one of over-connectivity (e.g. Rubenstein & Merzenich, 2003). Belmonte et al. reconciled these two ideas, suggesting that “high local connectivity may develop in tandem with low long-range connectivity” and that “high physical connectivity and low computational connectivity may reinforce each other by failing to differentiate signal from noise” (see also Johnson, 2005, Quartz and Sejnowski, 1997, Rubenstein and Merzenich, 2003).

Long-distance under-connectivity in ASD implies that “any facet of psychological function that is dependent on the coordination or integration of brain regions is susceptible to disruption, particularly when the computational demand of the coordination is large” (Just et al., 2004). “Core” autistic deficits in social interaction, language and repetitive and restrictive behaviors (APA, 1994) arise because these are the domains that place the largest demands on the time-sensitive integration of information from spatially discrete brain areas (Herbert, 2005, Just et al., 2004, Lewis and Elman, 2008; although see Mottron, Dawson, Soulieres, Hubert, & Burack, 2006). As such, the theory is in some ways a neural substantiation of central coherence theory (e.g. Happe, 1999, Happe and Frith, 2006) which posits “a cognitive style biased towards local rather than global information processing” (Happe, 1999), although Just et al. (2004) contest this claim, pointing out that central coherence theory postulates “a core deficit in central processing” (Happe & Frith, 2006) whereas “under-connectivity theory treats the coherence as an emergent property of the collaboration among brain centers” (Just et al., 2004).

Local over-connectivity has also been connected to findings of behavioral hyper-specificism and inferior generalization in ASD (Casanova et al., 2006a, Cohen, 2007; see also Gustafsson, 1997, McClelland, 2000), and to superior discrimination on certain tasks (Cohen, 2007; see also Mottron et al., 2006 for an excellent discussion of this), as for example in the embedded figures task (see also Plaisted et al., 1998, Shah and Frith, 1983).

Friston (1994) suggested that there are two guiding principles to neural function. The first is functional segregation and the second is functional integration, a process mediated by connectivity. Functional segregation describes the location of information processing; as Friston notes, the explosion of neuroimaging work over the last twenty years “has been extremely successful in establishing functional segregation as a principle of organization in the human brain” (Friston, 1994). The aspect that has received relatively less attention is the functional integration of information – how information is combined between different areas during the performance of particular tasks (Friston, 1994, Honey et al., 2009, Horwitz, 2003).

In this article we will distinguish two types of connectivity (following Friston, 1994, Horwitz, 2003, Sporns, 2007):

Structural connectivity refers to the physical or structural (synaptic) connections linking sets of neurons or neuronal elements, and to their associated structural biophysical attributes encapsulated in parameters such as synaptic strength or effectiveness (Friston, 1994, Sporns, 2007). Structural connectivity can describe how individual neurons are connected (at the micro scale) and also how different brain regions are connected (at the macro scale).

Functional connectivity refers to the degree to which activity in one area correlates with activity in another (David et al., 2004, Friston, 1994), or to the temporal synchronization of activation of two brain areas during task performance (Friston, 1994, Horwitz, 2003, Rippon et al., 2007). As a purely correlative measure, measurements of functional connectivity leave open questions of causation, and of whether control is symmetric, asymmetric, or coordinated by a third area (c.f. effective connectivity – Friston, 1994, Friston, 2009).

It is important to recognize that structural and functional connectivity are not necessarily co-referential. For example, tonic neuromodulatory changes can affect the functional activation patterns of a range of neurons without altering the structural connectivity (Friston, 1994; see also He et al., 2008, Honey et al., 2009, Sorg et al., 2007, Sporns, 2007, Sporns et al., 2000, Stephan et al., 2009).

The past few years have seen an explosion in interest in the tools that can be used to study brain connectivity (Friston, 2002, Honey et al., 2009, Horwitz and Glabus, 2005). Structural connectivity is being measured using MRI-based techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (Behrens et al., 2003, Conturo et al., 1999; see Karlsgodt et al., 2008 for an excellent brief summary) that examine the structural integrity of white matter tracts that are seen as the inter-areal macro structural correlates of brain connectivity (Fields, 2008, Oishi et al., 2008; although this may be a simplistic view – see e.g. Karadottir et al., 2008, Schummers et al., 2008, Ziskin et al., 2007). Tractography based on DTI (e.g. Hagmann et al., 2003, Hagmann et al., 2008, Lewis et al., 2009) can be used to trace fiber tracts, allowing association fiber pathways to be mapped in vivo. Problems remain with these techniques, though, particularly coping with multiple fiber orientations within a single voxel (Wedeen et al., 2008).

At the macro (whole brain) level, structural MRI has also been used to look at correlations between the size of different brain regions (e.g. Boucher et al., 2005), and a number of other techniques have also been used to aid the parcellation of structural MRI data, including voxel-based morphometry (VBM), a post hoc analysis that allows the relative volumes of different brain areas to be compared with greater precision than traditional morphometric techniques (e.g. Abell et al., 1999).

At a much higher spatial resolution, post mortem histological analyses (e.g. Casanova et al., 2006a) can trace neural connectivity at the micro- and meso-levels (such as mini-columnar structures), although sample sizes, particularly of immature subjects, remain (thankfully) very low.

Functional connectivity data on fMRI comes from studying correlations between activation patterns of particular voxels during task performance. EEG has been used to provide indices of connectivity in ASD in two ways – firstly, power in the higher frequency bands (particularly gamma, typically >25 Hz), that is thought (e.g. Csibra et al., 2000, Engel and Singer, 2001, Paik et al., 2009) to represent binding between spatially discrete areas of the brain (see e.g. Rippon et al., 2007, Thai et al., 2009). Secondly, coherence, which gives an index of the average degree of correlation between spatially discrete electrode groupings (see e.g. Lachaux et al., 1999, Murias et al., 2007, Thatcher et al., 2008).

For both fMRI and EEG, more advanced techniques have recently been developed that allow the calculation of effective connectivity – the influence that one neural system exerts over another (Friston, 1994, Friston, 2009, Sporns, 2007). These techniques, which include Granger causal modeling and dynamic causal modeling (see Friston, 2009 for a review) have not, to our knowledge, been applied to data from subjects with autism.

It is also interesting to note that some ingenious behavioral measures have been interpreted as evidence of abnormal functional connectivity. For example, Tommerdahl, Tannan, Holden, & Baranek, 2008 (see also Haswell, Izawa, Dowell, Mostofsky, & Shadmehr, 2009) investigated the absence of stimulus-driven synchronization effects on tactile perception in autism, a finding they suggest may relate to macro-columnar under-connectivity in the somatosensory cortex. Again, a full discussion of this work is beyond the scope of this review.

Finally, neural network modeling – which can model both structural and functional aspects – has played an important role in investigating how disrupted connectivity might affect subsequent autistic development at a variety of spatiotemporal scales (e.g. Noriega, 2008).

In addition to those areas we discuss in this paper, there has also been considerable discussion of the micro-structural correlates of connectivity, such as neurite morphology and synaptogenesis (see, for example, Persico & Bourgeron, 2006), signaling molecules such as HGF/MET, Reelin and neurotrophins (see e.g. Pardo & Eberhart, 2007), synaptic proteins (e.g. neuroligins – see Garber, 2007, Gutierrez et al., 2009) and neuro- and/or gliogensis (see e.g. Courchesne et al., 2007, McCaffery and Deutsch, 2005). A number of authors have also discussed the role that disruptions to various neurotransmitters (in particular GABA) might play during development (Delong, 2007, Kana et al., 2007, Van Kooten et al., 2005).

A full review of this material would render this paper indigestibly large; the interested reader is recommended to visit a number of excellent recent discussions on these subjects. Particular highlights include Courchesne et al. (2007, on the micro-structural correlates of early brain overgrowth), Herbert (2005, also on the mechanisms that might drive brain overgrowth), Pardo and Eberhart (2007, on how the micro correlates of structural connectivity might become disrupted as a result of aberrant development) and Persico and Bourgeron (2006, also on the micro correlates of disrupted structural connectivity).

In Sections 3 Hypothesis 2 – over-connectivity exists within local networks in ASD, 4 Hypothesis 3: connectivity disruptions are uniform across the whole brain in ASD of this article we review recent evidence regarding connectivity in ASD. For the sake of clarity, we have structured our discussion around three principal hypotheses. In each section, we review the evidence from a variety of methodologies that can be brought to bear in addressing each hypothesis.

Section snippets

Evidence from fMRI

A number of studies have used fMRI to identify medium- and long-distance functional under-connectivity in individuals with ASD (see Müller, 2008, Williams and Minshew, 2007 for more specialized recent reviews). Horwitz et al. (1988), using PET, provided the first such finding, specifically a lower level of correlation in activation between frontal, parietal, and other regions in a resting adult autistic brain. Using fMRI, Just et al. (2004) found reduced functional connectivity between Broca’s

Evidence from fMRI

In addition to the findings of medium- to long-range functional under-connectivity discussed in Section 2, a smaller number of fMRI studies have reported what appears to be evidence of local functional over-connectivity: that functional activation within certain brain areas is more than usually correlated with activity within the same region (see also Belmonte and Yurgelun-Todd, 2003, Belmonte et al., 2004, Rubenstein and Merzenich, 2003). For example, Schmitz et al. (2006) reported increased

Hypothesis 3: connectivity disruptions are uniform across the whole brain in ASD

Early formulations of the theory tended to discuss brain over- and under-connectivity as a whole brain phenomenon. Unsurprisingly, as more evidence has accumulated, this picture has become more detailed. The hypothesis that connectivity disruptions in ASD are uniform across the whole brain can be conclusively rejected; in the following two sections we will discuss what seem to be the most important between-region trends.

Is disrupted connectivity part of the primary pathogenesis in ASD?

Despite considerable evidence that connectivity is disrupted in ASD, controversy persists over what place disrupted connectivity should take within our understanding of the disease. Are connectivity problems best seen as “central”, “core” or “primary” in ASD, or are they one of numerous “downstream” features of disrupted system performance? There is some ambiguity in the literature concerning this issue. In their influential formulation of the theory, for example, Just et al. (2004) argue that

Conclusion

We have reviewed (Section 2) fMRI and EEG studies that provide overwhelming evidence of functional under-connectivity within medium- and long-range networks in mature subjects with ASD. We have also reviewed DTI studies that demonstrate inter-hemispheric structural under-connectivity in mature subjects with ASD. With regard to younger subjects, however, there are fewer studies and the evidence is considerably more mixed. In particular, the small number of DTI studies that have used younger

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Mark Johnson for reading numerous drafts, to Michael Thomas, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Fred Dick, Paul Taylor, Victoria Knowland and John Lewis for many stimulating discussions, and to the Bloomsbury Colleges for funding.

References (189)

  • D.B. Chklovskii et al.

    Wiring optimization in cortical circuits

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • A.R. Clarke et al.

    EEG coherence in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    International Journal of Psychophysiology

    (2008)
  • R. Coben et al.

    EEG power and coherence in autistic spectrum disorder

    Clinical Neurophysiology

    (2008)
  • E. Courchesne et al.

    Brain overgrowth in autism during a critical time in development: Implications for frontal pyramidal neuron and interneuron development and connectivity

    International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • E. Courchesne et al.

    Why the frontal cortex in autism might be talking only to itself: Local over-connectivity but long-distance disconnection

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (2005)
  • E.P.K. Courchesne et al.

    Mapping early brain development in autism

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • O. David et al.

    Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • G. Dawson et al.

    Rate of head growth decelerates and symptoms worsen in the second year of life in autism

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • M. Elsabbagh et al.

    Neural correlates of eye gaze processing in the infant broader autism phenotype

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • A.K. Engel et al.

    Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2001)
  • R.D. Fields

    White matter in learning, cognition and psychiatric disorders

    Trends in Neurosciences

    (2008)
  • T.W. Frazier et al.

    A meta-analysis of the corpus callosum in autism

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • D.H. Geschwind et al.

    Autism spectrum disorders: Developmental disconnection syndromes

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (2007)
  • S.J. Gilbert et al.

    Atypical recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex in autism spectrum disorders: An fMRI study of two executive function tasks

    Neuropsychologia

    (2008)
  • P. Hagmann et al.

    DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: Statistical fibre tracking and virtual dissection

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • F. Happe

    Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style?

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (1999)
  • K.M. Hasan et al.

    Diffusion tensor quantification of the human midsagittal corpus callosum subdivisions across the lifespan

    Brain Research

    (2008)
  • B. Horwitz

    The elusive concept of brain connectivity

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • B. Horwitz et al.

    Neural modeling and functional brain imaging: The interplay between the data-fitting and simulation approaches

    International Review of Neurobiology

    (2005)
  • J.J. Hutsler et al.

    Increased dendritic spine densities on cortical projection neurons in autism spectrum disorders

    Brain Research

    (2010)
  • R.K. Kana et al.

    Inhibitory control in high-functioning autism: Decreased activation and underconnectivity in inhibition networks

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • F. Abell et al.

    The neuroanatomy of autism: A voxel-based whole brain analysis of structural scans

    NeuroReport

    (1999)
  • Association, A. P. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington,...
  • A.J. Barkovich

    Magnetic resonance techniques in the assessment of myelin and myelination

    Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

    (2005)
  • S. Baron-Cohen et al.

    Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism

    Science

    (2005)
  • S. Baron-Cohen et al.

    Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: An fMRI study

    European Journal of Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • T.E.J. Behrens et al.

    Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • M.K. Belmonte et al.

    Autism and abnormal development of brain connectivity

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • L. Benitez-Bribiesca et al.

    Dendritic spine pathology in infants with severe protein-calorie malnutrition

    Pediatrics

    (1999)
  • I. Boger-Megiddo et al.

    Corpus callosum morphometrics in young children with autism spectrum disorder

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2006)
  • J. Boucher et al.

    A combined clinical, neuropsychological, and neuroanatomical study of adults with high functioning autism

    Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

    (2005)
  • V. Braitenberg

    Brain size and number of neurons: An exercise in synthetic neuroanatomy

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • J. Brock et al.

    The temporal binding deficit hypothesis of autism

    Development and Psychopathology

    (2002)
  • D.P. Buxhoeveden et al.

    Reduced minicolumns in the frontal cortex of patients with autism

    Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

    (2006)
  • D.S. Cantor et al.

    Computerized EEG analyses of autistic children

    International Journal of Autism

    (1987)
  • P.A. Carpenter et al.

    Dynamic cortical systems subserving cognition: fMRI studies with typical and atypical individuals

  • M.F. Casanova et al.

    Minicolumnar pathology in autism

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • M.F. Casanova et al.

    White matter volume increase and minicolumns in autism [1] (multiple letters)

    Annals of Neurology

    (2004)
  • M.F. Casanova et al.

    Minicolumnar abnormalities in autism

    Acta Neuropathologica

    (2006)
  • F. Castelli et al.

    Autism, asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes

    Brain

    (2002)
  • Cited by (257)

    • The subcortex as a trainer for cortical automaticity

      2024, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
    • White matter microstructure in autism

      2022, The Neuroscience of Autism
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text