Pointing with the eyes: The role of gaze in communicating danger
Introduction
Facial expression and direction of gaze are significant components of the information provided by a face. In the course of development, detection of gaze orientation plays an important role. Human and nonhuman primates interact with their caregivers and learn from observing the direction of gaze what objects to avoid. In primates, fear can be communicated through the mechanism of joint attention: young rhesus monkeys, initially unafraid of snakes, show fear after witnessing the fearful reaction of their parents to a snake (toy or real), suggesting that they are able to couple their parents’ fearful expression and their direction of gaze to learn that snakes are dangerous (Mineka, Davidson, Cook, & Keir, 1984).
Until recently, studies of gaze processing have used neutral faces, and investigated the attentional cues provided by gaze direction. Direction of gaze influences the level of activity in areas involved in processing faces, including the fusiform gyrus, the superior temporal sulcus and the intraparietal sulcus (George et al., 2001, Hoffman and Haxby, 2000, Pelphrey et al., 2003). But gaze direction may play a more complex role when it belongs to a face expressing a specific emotion (Adams et al., 2003, Adams and Kleck, 2003, Klucharev and Sams, 2004, Mathews et al., 2003, Sato et al., 2004); but see (Hietanen & Leppanen, 2003). A fearful facial expression with an observer-averted gaze is automatically recognized (Anderson, Christoff, Panitz, De Rosa, & Gabrieli, 2003) as possibly indicating environmental threat (“there is a danger located where I am looking at”) and as requiring an adaptive response (“you need to avoid it”).
Several recent studies indicate gaze direction influences other brain areas besides the ones specifically associated with face recognition. To account for this, several groups have developed a distributed representation model of face perception (Bruce and Young, 1986, de Gelder et al., 2003, Haxby et al., 2000, Haxby et al., 1994, Haxby et al., 1996, Hoffman and Haxby, 2000), in which different areas of the brain respond to different attributes of a face, such as identity (fusiform gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus), gaze direction and recognition of action (superior temporal sulcus), and expression and/or emotion (orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, premotor cortex).
It is well known that the sight of a fearful face expression provides a very strong signal, however, a fearful face can be either empathy-evoking to the observer or threat-related, depending on its gaze direction. Facial expression of fear can be ambiguous because it may be unclear whether the emphasis is on communicating an experienced emotion to the observer and possibly provoking empathy, or on providing a danger signal to an observer with the goal of preparing him to act. To date there have only been very few studies that have manipulated separately the facial expression and the direction of gaze (Adams and Kleck, 2005, Ganel et al., 2005). Two previous studies used behavioral measures (Adams & Kleck, 2003) and event-related brain imaging (Adams et al., 2003) to investigate the combined effect of gaze and facial expression. The behavioral study revealed a shorter reaction time for fearful faces looking away compared with fearful faces looking at the observer. The brain imaging study revealed increased amygdala activation for stimuli consisting of angry faces with an averted gaze and fearful faces with a direct gaze, that were ambiguous in terms of their significance as threat to the observer. No other areas were reported.
It is reasonable to expect that different brain networks are involved as a function of the direction of gaze a facial expression. To address this issue, we manipulated direction of gaze in fearful faces. Our goal was to test a single very specific prediction related to the combined perception of fear and averted gaze and its impact on action readiness. Our hypothesis was that a fearful face expression with averted gaze signals a danger in the environment and may trigger activity in brain areas involved in characteristic adaptive action associated with fear such as preparing to flight. If fearful faces with averted gaze do indeed signal danger in the environment (threat-related), then they should prompt more premotor and motor activity than faces with directed gaze where the emphasis is more on communicating the emotion and triggering empathy in the observer (empathy-evoking). We tested the hypothesis that threat-related fearful face would modulate activation in areas involved in stimulus detection, in fear processing, and in preparation for action. We did not use neutral faces in this study, because in the context of an emotional expression study, neutral faces suffer from carry-over effects and acquire an unintended emotional significance. To specifically address our hypothesis related to fear processing we limited our paradigm to fearful expression of emotion.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Stimuli were taken from the NimStim Emotional Face Stimuli database (http://www.macbrain.org/faces/index.htm#faces), a set of over 600 face images, consisting of 16 expressions posed by 45 professional actors. All expressions have been validated, and only faces that received more than 90% agreement in the validation were used. Eight fearful faces (four females) were selected. We used Adobe Photoshop 8.0 to alter gaze direction towards the left and the right and downwards (Fig. 1). Grayscale
Imaging
Structural and functional MR images of brain activity of eight participants (3 males, age 29 ± 6 years) were collected in a 3T high-speed echoplanar imaging device (Allegra, Siemens) using a phased-array head coil. Participants all had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. Informed written consent was obtained before the scanning session, and the Massachusetts General Hospital Human Studies Committee under Protocol #2002P-000228 approved all procedures. Structural images were collected with the
Image statistics
Image analysis was conducted using the NeuroLens analysis package (Hoge & Lissot, 2004) (http://www.neurolens.org, version 1.3). All functional EPI and structural scans were first converted from DICOM to MINC format using NeuroLens. Functional image series were motion corrected to the third frame in each series within NeuroLens using a hardware-accelerated module based on source code from AFNI’s 3dvolreg module (Cox & Jesmanowicz, 1999). Next, each image series was spatially smoothed in 3D with
Results and discussion
Fearful faces with the gaze averted compared with the same faces directly gazing at the observer increased activation in areas belonging to face and emotion processing networks. Areas of increased BOLD signal were found in gaze processing areas (superior temporal sulcus, intraparietal sulcus); in face identification areas (fusiform gyrus, inferior occipital gyrus); in areas involved in rapid stimulus detection (left amygdala, visual area MT+); in areas involved in fear processing (left
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by NIH Grant RO1 NS44824-01 and Swiss National Foundation Grant PPOOB—110741 to Nouchine Hadjikhani. We thank Reginald Adams and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on our manuscript.
References (57)
- et al.
Severe reduction of rat defensive behavior to a predator by discrete hypothalamic chemical lesions
Brain Research Bulletin
(1997) - et al.
Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction
Neuroimage
(1999) - et al.
Cortical surface-based analysis II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system
NeuroImage
(1999) - et al.
Interactions between the processing of gaze direction and facial expression
Vision Research
(2005) - et al.
Seen gaze-direction modulates fusiform activity and its coupling with other brain areas during face processing
Neuroimage
(2001) - et al.
Activation of the fusiform gyrus when individuals with autism spectrum disorder view faces
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2000) - et al.
Task instructions modulate neural responses to fearful facial expressions
Biological Psychiatry
(2003) Brain mechanisms of emotion and emotional learning
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
(1992)- et al.
Effect of head orientation on gaze processing in fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus
Neuroimage
(2003)
Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: The influence of context
Neuropsychologia
The amygdala processes the emotional significance of facial expressions: an fMRI investigation using the interaction between expression and face direction
Neuroimage
Fear and power-dominance drive motivation: neural representations and pathways mediating sensory and mnemonic inputs, and outputs to premotor structures
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Brain regions involved in the perception of gaze: a PET study
Neuroimage
A general statistical analysis for fMRI data
Neuroimage
The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli
Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews
Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces
Science
Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion
Psychological Science
Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion
Emotion
Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: Psychological and neurological mechanisms
Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews
The amygdala, social behavior, and danger detection
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals
Journal of Neuroscience
Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study
Archives of general psychiatry
Understanding face recognition
British Journal of Psychology
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Cited by (101)
Social context modulates autonomic responses to direct eye contact
2023, Physiology and BehaviorQuantifying gaze conspicuousness: Are humans distinct from chimpanzees and bonobos?
2021, Journal of Human EvolutionTwo functions of the primate amygdala in social gaze
2021, NeuropsychologiaDifferential magnocellular versus parvocellular pathway contributions to the combinatorial processing of facial threat
2019, Progress in Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :At the time, this finding also helped resolve the long-standing puzzle as to why amygdala activation was consistently and robustly found in response to fear displays, but not to anger displays, when anger (at least coupled with direct gaze) is arguably a clearer signal of threat (it signals the presence of threat, its source, and its target). Although subsequent studies replicated these initial findings for greater amygdala response to threat-related ambiguity (e.g., Ewbank et al., 2010; George et al., 2001; Straube et al., 2009; Ziaei et al., 2016), other studies emerged that reported the exact opposite pattern, greater amygdala response found to congruent versus ambiguous threat-gaze pairs (Hadjikhani et al., 2008; N'Diaye et al., 2009; Sato et al., 2004). Helping address these disparate findings, a new factor was tested that systematically moderated these effects, namely stimulus presentation speed (Adams et al., 2012).