Elsevier

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volume 32, April 2016, Pages 41-49
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Clinical Research
The Use of the Angiosome Concept for Treating Infrapopliteal Critical Limb Ischemia through Interventional Therapy and Determining the Clinical Significance of Collateral Vessels

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2015.09.021Get rights and content

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the involvement of collateral vessels in interventional therapy based on the angiosome concept for infrapopliteal critical limb ischemia (CLI).

Methods

We enrolled 486 patients with unilateral infrapopliteal CLI (Rutherford Stage 5 or 6) treated at 2 hospitals from January 2005 to December 2014. Using the angiosome concept, the patients were categorized into 3 groups: the direct revascularization (DR) group, the indirect revascularization through collaterals (IR-tc) group, and the indirect revascularization without collaterals (IR-wc) group. The data from 1 year of follow-up after the initial surgery were analyzed for all 3 groups.

Results

During the 1-year follow-up, the unhealed ulcer rate of the IR-wc group was significantly higher than that of the DR group (83.4% vs. 31.7%, P < 0.001) and the IR-tc group (83.4% vs. 34.8%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the limb salvage rate of the IR-wc group was significantly lower than that of the DR group (70.4% vs. 89.2%, P < 0.001) and the IR-tc group (70.4% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.0013). However, there were no differences in the unhealed ulcer rate or the limb salvage rate between the DR group and the IR-tc group (31.7% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.096 and 89.2% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.2834, respectively). In addition, within the IR-wc group, the unhealed ulcer rate of diabetic patients was higher than that of patients without diabetes (90.0% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.0116), but there was no difference in the limb salvage rate between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. No differences in the unhealed ulcer rate or the limb salvage rate were found between diabetic and nondiabetic patients in the other 2 groups.

Conclusions

Following the angiosome model of perfusion for endovascular therapy, directly revascularizing the feeding artery and indirectly achieving revascularization through collaterals can effectively prompt the healing of ulcers and decrease the amputation rate in patients with infrapopliteal CLI. Collateral vessels play a crucial role in the treatment of ischemic foot.

Introduction

Critical limb ischemia (CLI), the end stage of peripheral artery disease, has a direct impact on quality of life and the limb salvage rate. Currently, with the aging population and an increasing incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM), infrapopliteal CLI is receiving increasing attention.1 The main clinical symptoms of infrapopliteal CLI are pain while resting, unhealed foot ulcers, and gangrene. Endovascular therapy has dramatically improved in recent years and has been gradually implemented as the first treatment option for infrapopliteal CLI because of its advantages, such as safety, efficacy, and repeatability.2, 3

Currently, the angiosome concept is widely researched in the field of infrapopliteal CLI endovascular therapy. In 1987, Taylor introduced the angiosome concept, which divides the infrapopliteal area into 3 source arteries (SAs) and 6 anatomic regions (angiosomes). Additionally, he defined direct revascularization (DR) as the revascularization of at least one feeding vessel that supplies the ischemic angiosome and indirect revascularization (IR) as the revascularization of a feeding vessel in an unrelated angiosome that can also restore the blood flow of the injured angiosome.4 Several studies have proposed that treatment based on the angiosome concept is the key for curing infrapopliteal CLI, but the clinical significance remains controversial. Two meta-analyses by Biancari and Juvonen and Bosanquet et al. suggested that DR results in better wound healing and a higher limb salvage rate than IR.5, 6 However, other recent studies showed that DR had a significantly better rate of wound healing but a similar limb salvage rate when compared with IR.7, 8, 9 Of note, the status of collateral vessels was not analyzed in these studies. Summarizing the above results, the differences among the previous studies may partly be explained by the collateral circulation of patients with infrapopliteal CLI in compensation, especially in the IR group.

This study compared the differences in the clinical outcomes of patients with infrapopliteal CLI treated with DR and IR and then further evaluated the clinical significance of the collateral vessels in endovascular therapy based on the angiosome concept.

Section snippets

Patients

Our study retrospectively analyzed patients with unilateral infrapopliteal CLI treated at the First Affiliate Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and the First Affiliate Hospital of Zhejiang University from January 2005 to December 2014. All participants met all of the following enrollment criteria: (1) one or more serious symptoms of CLI, including ulcers and gangrene (Rutherford Stage 5 or 6); (2) below-knee artery stenosis or occlusion diagnosed by arteriography; and (3) successful

Clinicopathological Characteristics of the 486 Diseased Limbs

Our study enrolled 486 patients with endovascular therapy of infrapopliteal CLI between January 2005 and December 2014. All patients had Rutherford clinical stage 5/6 disease. Some diseased areas were recorded as multiple angiosomes because they were fed by at least 2 angiosomes. The ulcer/gangrene regions in the present study were mainly concentrated in the DP (61.5%), MP (40.5%), and LP (27.2%). The demographic characteristics, comorbidities, ulcer/gangrene description, and examination data

Discussion

With the development of endovascular therapy, surgical interest in below-the-knee endovascular therapy has increased. At the early stage, successful endovascular therapy is defined as reconstruction of at least one of the 3 infrapopliteal arteries. However, the clinical outcome of this technology is not satisfactory. Studies have shown that refractory ulcers are frequently observed in patients after successful revascularization of the lower limb and that these refractory ulcers result in a

Cited by (39)

  • SCAI/ACR/APMA/SCVS/SIR/SVM/SVS/VESS position statement on competencies for endovascular specialists providing CLTI care

    2022, Journal of Vascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    At a fundamental level, the proceduralists should be able to interpret a lower extremity arteriogram and use that anatomic information to develop a revascularization strategy. Angiosome-based revascularization, while conceptually important, does have limitations that should be understood when formulating revascularization plans.30 At a more advanced level, experience and familiarity with pedal arch anatomy will aid in cases of complex CLTI.31

View all citing articles on Scopus

Xiang-Tao Zheng and Rui-Chao Zeng participated equally and should share “first authorship”.

Zi-Heng Wu and Guan-Feng Yu participated equally and should share “corresponding authorship”.

This is an original article. We certify that this manuscript has not been published previously and is not based on a previous communication to a society or meeting.

View full text