WITHDRAWN: From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation

doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.004

Aggression and Violent Behavior

Volume 11, Issue 6, November–December 2006, Pages 641-654

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.004 Get rights and content

The publisher regrets that this was an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11 (2006) 612–625, doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.005. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn.

References (0)

Cited by (21)

How impulsivity and intelligence are related to different forms of aggression
2017, Personality and Individual Differences
Citation Excerpt :
Despite these limitations, the results reported above have important implications for the prediction of aggressive behaviour, particularly in the case of IA. Indirect aggression is the most usual form of aggression in adolescence and adulthood, and has an important role in phenomena such as bullying, workplace violence, mobbing, etc. (Björkqvist, Österman, & Hjelt-Bäck, 1994; Garandeau & Cillessen, 2006). Nevertheless, as Vaillancourt (2005) pointed out, in comparison with DA much less is known about its predictors.
Several studies have shown that the relationships between intelligence and self-reported aggression are low or non-existent. Most have focused on direct forms of aggression, which often have an impulsive component, unlike indirect aggression, which is usually delayed and allows more time to find alternative solutions to the problem. The present study analyses the relationships between different measures of intelligence and an overall estimate of “g” with direct and indirect forms of aggression and impulsivity in a sample of adolescents (N = 532). The results showed that impulsivity and intelligence showed a different pattern of relationships with different forms of aggression. While intelligence measures were more related to indirect aggression, particularly to the g factor estimate, impulsivity was more related to direct forms of aggression. Furthermore, the relationships observed between aggression and intelligence cannot be explained by impulsivity having the same effect on both kinds of measure and are independent of sex effects. Taking everything into account, intelligence should be regarded as a relevant predictor for the prevention of aggressive behaviour in adolescents, particularly indirect aggression.
Associations between the group processes of bullying and adolescent substance use
2016, Addictive Behaviors
Citation Excerpt :
While adolescents who bully have often been described as having poor social skills for engaging in peer relations (Kaltiala-Heino et al., 2000), there is growing evidence that students who bully are typically skilled and strategic, using their bullying behaviors to obtain status and popularity (Salmivalli, 2010). Pro-bullying behavior is often directly related to being “cool” (Juvonen, Graham, & Schuster, 2003), and can assist students to “fit in” with and “belong” to their peer group (Garandeau & Cillessen, 2006). Preliminary studies have found that perceived popularity is also associated with substance use (Moody, Brynildsen, Osgood, Feinberg, & Gest, 2011; Tucker et al., 2011; Tucker et al., 2013).
The adverse impact of bullying and victimization on substance use among youth has received increasing attention. Bullying is a specific type of aggressive behavior that not only involves bullies and victims but also followers, who actively support or reinforce the bully; defenders, who intervene to defend or assist the victim; or outsiders who passively observe or ignore the bullying. Limited research to date has linked these five bullying role behaviors to substance use. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between each of the bullying role behaviors and adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. Participants were 1255 (748 female) students (M_age = 15.3, age range: 13–17 years) in Grades 9 (n = 714) and 11 (n = 541). Bullying role behaviors, alcohol and tobacco onset and intensity, and alcohol-related harms were assessed. Results revealed an association between pro-bullying behavior (bullying and following) and all substance use variables, and between defender behavior and smoking and alcohol-related harm. No relationship between victimization, or outsider behavior, and substance use was found after controlling for the other bullying roles. The findings highlight the complex relationship between bullying roles, alcohol and tobacco use and alcohol-related harm in adolescents.
Evolutionary perspectives on bullying
2021, The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention
Forest manners exchange: Forest as a place to remedy risky behaviour of adolescents: Mixed methods approach
2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Peculiarities of Perceived Aggressiveness among Youth School’s Students
2021, European Journal of Contemporary Education
Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyze Traumatic Experiences and Factors of Vulnerability Among Adolescent Victims of Bullying
2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text