Original article
Cardiovascular
Comparison of Saphenous Vein and Internal Thoracic Artery Graft Patency by Coronary System

Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 26–28, 2004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.047Get rights and content

Background

We sought to compare saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system.

Methods

From 1972 to 1999, 50,278 patients underwent primary coronary surgery; subsequently, 4,333 had angiography of 2,121 internal thoracic artery and 8,733 saphenous vein grafts. Longitudinal analysis was used to model graft occlusion and identify risk factors. Using the model, patency was calculated twice for each graft and compared first as if an internal thoracic artery, and second as if a saphenous vein, were used.

Results

Unadjusted 1-, 5-, and 10-year patency was 93%, 88%, and 90% for internal thoracic arteries and 78%, 65%, and 57% for saphenous veins. At 10 years, internal thoracic arteries were more likely than saphenous veins to be patent to left anterior descending in 99.1% of cases, to diagonals in 98.3%, to circumflex in 98.3%, to posterior descending artery in 98.5%, and to right coronary arteries in 82.5%. For right coronary arteries, saphenous vein patency was equivalent to or better than internal thoracic artery patency early after surgery. However, by 10 years, internal thoracic artery patency was better in right coronary arteries with 70% stenosis or greater. At all times after surgery and all levels of clinically important coronary stenosis, internal thoracic artery patency surpassed saphenous vein patency in grafts to the left anterior descending, diagonal, circumflex, and posterior descending arteries.

Conclusions

Internal thoracic arteries demonstrate better patency than saphenous veins except when grafting moderately stenosed right coronary arteries. When bypassing right coronary arteries with less than 70% stenosis, saphenous veins may be a better choice.

Section snippets

Patients

Using the computerized Cardiovascular Information Registry (CVIR) at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF), patients were identified and included in this study if they had CABG at CCF between 1972 and 1999 and their medical records contained the following: (1) detailed preoperative angiographic data describing location and severity of native coronary arteriosclerosis; (2) results of at least one postoperative angiogram performed before any repeat coronary intervention; and (3) detailed

Overall Graft Patency

Unadjusted overall patency at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after CABG was 93%, 88%, 90%, and 92% for ITA grafts and 78%, 65%, 57%, and 53% for SVGs, respectively (Fig 2).

Risk Factors For Graft Occlusion

Risk factors for graft occlusion, identified by multivariable longitudinal analysis, were: (1) degree of proximal coronary artery stenosis for ITA grafts; (2) time from CABG to angiography; (3) coronary artery to which grafts were anastomosed; (4) bypass conduit used (ITA or saphenous vein); (5) gender; (6) patient age; (7) date of

Background

Long-term success of coronary revascularization depends on graft patency [13]. Internal thoracic artery grafts, because of their resistance to arteriosclerosis, are believed to have better patency than SVGs. The excellent patency of ITA grafts is believed to be responsible for increased survival and decreased occurrence of angina and need for reoperation when they are used to bypass the LAD 1, 2. A weakness of ITA grafts is that they are more likely to fail when used to bypass coronary arteries

Summary

At all times after operation and at all degrees of proximal coronary artery stenosis, ITA grafts were more likely to be patent than SVGs when used to bypass the LAD, diagonals, LCx, and PDA. Early after CABG, SVGs demonstrated better or equivalent patency when used to bypass RCAs. However, because of SVG arteriosclerosis, by 10 years postoperatively, ITA grafts were more likely than SVGs to be patent to RCAs with 70% or greater stenosis.

Cited by (339)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text