Research reportDoes food planning mediate the association between living arrangements and fruit and vegetable consumption among women aged 40 years and older?☆
Introduction
Low intakes of fruits and vegetables are key risk factors for a range of chronic diseases (NHMRC, 2005, World Cancer Research, 2007). In many countries – for example, France, Denmark, the US as well as Australia – older people generally consume healthier diets than their younger counterparts (Guenther et al., 2006, Lau et al., 2004, Magarey et al., 2006, Perrin et al., 2002, Serdula et al., 2004), but they still tend to have low intakes of fruit and vegetables (Ball et al., 2006, Greene et al., 2008). The most recent National nutrition survey shows that only around one-third of Australian adults aged between 41 and 50 years and 35% of those aged between 51 and 64 years reported consuming the recommended 2 or more serves of fruit per day, whilst the percentage of people in these age groups who consumed the recommended 5 or more serves of vegetables per day was approximately 30–35% (Magarey et al., 2006). Furthermore only 11% of the adults were meeting the recommendations for both fruit and vegetables (Magarey et al., 2006). Since these data were collected, other studies have found similarly low intakes and the pattern is similar in other western countries (Block et al., 1999, DHS, 2005, Loughrey et al., 2001).
One factor that has been found to influence dietary quality is the living arrangements of individuals, particularly whether people live in single- or multiple-member households. Population ageing is more prevalent in developed countries such as Australia (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006) and this may result in a considerable change in household structure in the future. The effect this may have on an individual's dietary intake is still unclear, but on the whole, the literature appears to suggest that living arrangements do influence diet, with those who live with others having better diets than those who live alone, but it does not give much insight into how or why this is so (Bae et al., 2007, Gustafsson and Sidenvall, 2002, Locher et al., 2005, Quine and Morrell, 2006).
There is some evidence to suggest that consumers who utilise food planning strategies have a better diet quality than those who buy or prepare food on impulse or with little planning (Abdel-Chany and Schrimper, 1978, Hersey et al., 2001). There are numerous planning strategies that can be employed to facilitate food shopping and food preparation. Crawford, Ball, Mishra, Salmon, and Timperio (2007) reported that women who wrote shopping lists were more inclined to eat 2 or more serves of vegetables per day. They also found that women who used other planning strategies, such as planning meals ahead of time or cooking dishes ahead of time, were twice as likely to consume more serves of vegetables (Crawford et al., 2007).
Socially constructed gender roles have resulted in women traditionally undertaking domestic duties including the planning, procurement and preparation of meals to be consumed by the family and while it has been found that men spend more hours doing domestic duties if their spouses are in the workforce, women are still more likely to be involved in the provision of food for the family (Bittman et al., 2003, Lake et al., 2006). Therefore, the aim of this paper is to investigate whether food planning strategies mediate the association between living arrangements and fruit and vegetable consumption amongst women aged 40 years and over. It was hypothesized that, compared with women living alone, women who live with others would be more likely to employ food planning strategies and this would explain their greater fruit and vegetable consumption.
Section snippets
Sample
This analysis used data provided by participants in the Socio-economic Status and Activity in Women (or SESAW) study, full methods of SESAW are described in detail elsewhere (Ball et al., 2006, Crawford et al., 2007). Briefly, in the SESAW study a random sample of 2400 women aged 18–75 was selected from the electoral roll using a stratified random sampling procedure to recruit all participants from 45 neighbourhoods of different socio-economic status (SES) within approximately 30 km of
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 14.0 statistical software. Descriptive analyses were used to examine the distributions of the key variables and covariates. Chi-square statistics were used to determine whether socio-demographic factors were associated with the reported number of serves of fruit and vegetables consumed (Table 1).
Social characteristics of participants and associations between predictor and outcome variables
A total of 473 participants were aged 43 years and over, with the age of the sample ranging from 43 to 72 years (M = 54 years, SD = 7.6). Almost one-third of the sample had less than 12 years education, around half of the participants were either not working or working part-time and 89% were living with a spouse or partner. Of those who lived alone 46% had never married. The mean (±standard deviation) intake of fruits was 2.98 ± 0.904 SD and vegetables 3.18 ± 0.926 SD.
Association between social
Discussion
This study examined whether food planning mediated the association between living arrangements and the consumption of fruit and vegetables for women aged 40 years and over. Women were considered important to study as many are still mostly responsible for the food shopping and preparation in the household (Caraher et al., 1999, Dholakia, 1999). In addition, previous studies have shown that whilst the quality of middle-aged and older people's diets is generally better than their younger
References (41)
- et al.
Shopping lists as an external memory aid for grocery shopping: influences on list writing and list fulfillment
Journal of Consumer Psychology
(1999) - et al.
Gender and living alone as determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among the elderly living at home in urban Nottingham
Appetite
(1998) - et al.
Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
(2006, September) - et al.
Food shopping practices are associated with dietary quality in low-income households
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
(2001, September) - et al.
Evaluation of fruit and vegetable intakes of Australian adults: the National Nutrition Survey 1995
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
(2006) - et al.
Food consumption expenditures and education of the homemaker
Home Economics Research Journal
(1978) National nutrition survey user's guide 1995
(1998)Census of population and housing: socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) Australia
(2003)Year book Australia
(2006)Oveweight and obesity in adults, Australia, 2004–05: National health survey
(2008)
Comparison of health behaviors among single and multiple-member households
American Journal of Health Behavior
Socio-economic inequalities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators
Public Health Nutrition
When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work
American Journal of Sociology
Mediation of adult fruit and vegetable consumption in the National 5 A day for better health community studies
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
The state of cooking in England: the relationship of cooking skills to food choice
British Food Journal
Which food-related behaviours are associated with healthier intakes of fruits and vegetables among women?
Public Health Nutrition
Going shopping: key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method
More Britons live alone
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This project was partly funded from a grant from the National Heart Foundation, reference number G 02 M 0-658. At the time of preparing this paper, WH was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Capacity Building Grant Fellowship. SAM is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health Postdoctoral Fellowship. DC is supported by a Victorian Health Promotion Foundation Senior Research Fellowship and KB is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship. WH proposed the paper, all authors contributed to the initial planning of the structure of the paper. WH prepared the drafts and was responsible for the progress of the paper including contributing to the introduction, analysis of data and discussion of results and finalized the preparation of the paper. SAMc had considerable input to the background information, analysis of data and reporting of results as well as reviewing and revising drafts of the article. DC contributed to the background, discussion and revision of drafts. KB directed the mediation analysis as well as revising drafts and contributing to the discussion of the results. DC and KB were leading investigators on the original research. There are no conflicts of interests relating to this paper.