Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 54, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 369-377
Appetite

Research report
Parent behavior and child weight status among a diverse group of underserved rural families

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was threefold: to investigate the association between three parenting behaviors (parenting style, feeding style, and feeding practices), to evaluate whether these behaviors were associated with child weight, and to determine whether style (parenting and feeding) moderated the relationship between feeding practice and child weight. Ninety-nine parent–child dyads were recruited for a cross-sectional study where parents self-reported their parenting style, feeding style, and feeding practices along with demographic characteristics. Height and weight were measured for each dyad. The relationship between parenting style and feeding style showed modest agreement. Feeding style, but not parenting style, was associated with child BMI z-score while controlling for known covariates. An indulgent feeding style was associated with a higher child weight status. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that feeding style moderated the association between restrictive feeding practices and child BMI z-score. No moderating relationship was found between feeding style and the practices of pressure to eat or monitoring and child weight. This research suggests that an indulgent feeding style may be predictive of higher child weight and that future studies should examine the possible moderating role of feeding style in the parent feeding practice–child weight relationship.

Introduction

Understanding the risk factors associated with undesirable weight gain in children is important if we are to reverse current obesity trends. This has prompted great interest in how family context influences child weight (Ventura & Birch, 2008). Within the family setting, parents play a particularly critical role in determining their child's behaviors, habits, and attitudes, and also dictate their physical and social environment (Davison and Birch, 2001, Ritchie et al., 2005). Recent evidence suggests that the influence of parenting on child overweight and obesity is likely to be complex (Joyce & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2009). Theoretically, a parent's influence may be either direct (e.g. parenting practices directly shape child development and behavior) or indirect (e.g. parenting style indirectly influences child development and behavior by altering – or moderating – the effectiveness of particular parenting practices) (Darling & Steinberg, 1993). However, a recent review (Ventura & Birch, 2008) noted that the child eating and obesity literature often fails to make the distinction between the terms parenting style and parenting practice.

Parenting style is based on the idea that parents’ attitudes and the beliefs they hold about how they should rear their children result in a two-way interaction that describes the emotional climate of the general parenting interaction (Darling & Steinberg, 1993). It describes how parents interact with their children. This dynamic process alters how a child views their parents and thus changes how receptive that child is to their parents’ socialization demands. Baumrind describes parenting style based on two dimensions of parental behavior: responsiveness/nurturance to and demandingness/control of the child (Baumrind, 1971). Responsiveness/nurturance is “the extent to which parents foster individuality and self-assertion by being attuned, supportive, and acquiescent to children's requests.” Demandingness/control refers to the “claims that parents make on children to become integrated into society through behavior regulation, direct confrontation, and maturity demands and supervision of children's activities.” Combining the two dimensions together – responsiveness/nurturance versus demandingness/control – results in four parenting style typologies: authoritarian, authoritative, indulgent, and uninvolved. An authoritarian style (high demandingness, low responsiveness) is characterized by attempts to control the child's behavior with little regard for the child's needs and strict obedience to the parent (Patrick, Nicklas, Hughes, & Morales, 2005). While an authoritative style (high demandingness, high responsiveness) suggests that parents provide encouragement for the child to express independence, clear set of boundaries, and open communication. Evidence supports the association between authoritative parenting and positive child health outcomes across multiple domains (Cullen et al., 2000, Gable and Lutz, 2000, Steinberg et al., 1996). General parenting research has focused mostly on general child outcomes including school achievement, social adjustment among peers, and alcohol and drug-related problems in adolescence (Steinberg, Lamborn, Dornbusch, & Darling, 1992).

There is now evidence in the childhood obesity literature to empirically support Darling and Steinberg's (Darling & Steinberg, 1993) theoretical framework that links parenting style to child outcomes, and in this context, child obesity-related behaviors. Rhee, Lumeng, Appugliese, Kaciroti, and Bradley (2006) demonstrated that an authoritarian parenting style was associated with the highest risk of child overweight, while Arredondo et al. (2006) found that a controlling parenting style was associated with poor child dietary intake. However, Blissett and Haycraft (2008) showed no relationship between parenting style and child BMI. The inconsistent findings may be due, in part, to the measurement of a general or more global parenting style.

Application of the parenting style conceptualization to the feeding context implies that parents’ possess overarching styles that can describe how they interact with their children during all feeding situations (Ventura & Birch, 2008). Measuring a style of feeding (referred to as ‘feeding style’) as opposed to a style of general parenting (referred to as ‘parenting style’) may be more predictive of weight status in childhood because of the context specific impact of feeding on the eating behavior of children (Hughes et al., 2006, Hughes et al., 2008, Wardle et al., 2002). As our understanding of the parent–child feeding relationship in the context of the childhood obesity epidemic has developed, research has shifted from concentrating on one construct of parenting – control – toward capturing other important aspects, such as responsiveness, to describe the behavior of parents (Hughes et al., 2006). Validated instruments such as the Caregiver Feeding Styles Questionnaire (Hughes, Power, Fisher, Mueller, & Nicklas, 2005) focus on both demandingness and responsiveness to describe a feeding typology similar to general parenting (Maccoby & Martin, 1983). For example, authoritarian type parents encourage eating using highly directive behaviors that are also not supportive of the child (e.g. physically struggling with the child, using rewards, and punishments) (Hughes et al., 2008).

Parenting practices are related to, but distinct from parenting styles, and describe the behavioral strategies that parents use to socialize their children (Darling and Steinberg, 1993, Ventura and Birch, 2008). Thus, parenting practices are embedded within the broader context of the emotional climate of parenting style, are less trait-like, and more responsive to contexts. Within the feeding domain, the majority of research has focused almost entirely on feeding practices and inferred feeding styles from these practices. Current evidence suggests that parents may inadvertently promote excess weight gain in childhood by using inappropriate feeding practices (Clark, Goyder, Bissell, Blank, & Peters, 2007). For instance, restricting access to highly desirable foods may hinder a child's ability to self-regulate their intake (Faith et al., 2004b, Ventura and Birch, 2008). This reduced responsiveness to internal hunger and satiety cues has been associated with greater childhood weight (Birch and Fisher, 2000, Fisher and Birch, 2000). In general, because style and practice are related concepts, certain practices may be more authoritative (e.g. praising the child, negotiating with the child), authoritarian (e.g. punishments, coercion) or permissive (e.g. letting the child eat whatever he/she wants). However, research that is solely focused on measuring individual feeding practices does not explicitly focus on or systematically allow for the measurement of feeding styles. This is because feeding practices sometimes infer, but do not necessarily measure demandingness and responsiveness, the two underlying dimensions of parenting style and feeding style. Measuring feeding styles in addition to feeding practices may give a more complete picture of children's feeding environments (Hughes et al., 2008, Rhee, 2008).

Moreover, recent studies have suggested that certain aspects of food-related parenting may vary across culturally diverse populations (Arredondo et al., 2006, Matheson et al., 2006, Powers et al., 2006). For instance, in contrast to previous studies, Matheson et al. (2006) found no relationship between restrictive feeding practices and child BMI percentile among Mexican-American families. Overall, knowledge in this area is limited because the majority of research has focused on a specific population: white, middle class, girls. More work is needed to determine whether the measurement of parental feeding functions differently in ethnically and socio-economically diverse populations.

Given the limited evidence regarding the conceptualization of feeding styles, and the discrepancies in the literature regarding the measurement of general parenting style in relation to child eating and weight status, we sought to investigate the inter-relationship between three parenting behaviors (parenting style, feeding style, and feeding practices) and to determine whether these behaviors relate to child weight status in a diverse group of parent–child dyads living in under-resourced rural areas. It is particularly important to focus on this population given that rural children now have a 25% greater risk of being overweight or obese compared to their metropolitan counterparts (Lutfiyya, Lipsky, Wisdom-Behounek, & Inpanbutr-Martinkus, 2007). Many studies either do not focus on rural areas or do not provide detailed information on rural populations, especially rural minorities (Tai-Seale & Chandler, 2003).

The first aim of this study was to describe the parenting styles, feeding styles, and feeding practices of rural parents. The second aim was to examine the agreement between parenting style and feeding style based on the limited evidence suggesting that the general parenting constructs of authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful may also translate into feeding styles within ethnically diverse populations (Fig. 1) (Hughes et al., 2006). The third aim was to investigate the association between parenting style, feeding style, and specific feeding practices. It has been argued that if feeding practices are independent of a parent's style, then certain practices could be targeted singly while those that are linked require interventions that treat underlying family dynamics as a whole (Hubbs-Tait, Kennedy, Page, Topham, & Harrist, 2008). Finally, following the theoretical framework described by Darling and Steinberg (Darling & Steinberg, 1993), we tested the moderating role of style (parenting and feeding) on the relationship between feeding practice and child weight status.

Section snippets

Procedures

We collected cross-sectional data from a multi-ethnic sample (29% White, 49% Black, and 22% Hispanic) of 99 parent–child dyads in the Spring of 2007. Participants were recruited through elementary schools located in rural areas of the Mississippi River Delta, Southeast, Appalachia, and Central Valley regions of the U.S. A “parent” was defined as either the biological parent or legal guardian with whom the child lived. A “child” was defined as being between the ages of 6–11 years. We used the

Descriptive

Table 1 describes the characteristics of the study sample. The majority of parents were female (n = 95) and the mother of the participating child (n = 87). Parents were between the ages of 30–39 years (n = 49) with a high school education or less (n = 55). Of the participants who self-identified as Hispanic (n = 22), 19 were either Mexican or Mexican-American. Fourteen participants were born in a country other than the U.S. (all from Mexico) and the average number of years (±SD) living in the U.S. for

Discussion

The primary goal of this study was to investigate the inter-relationship among three parenting behaviors and evaluate their relationship with child weight status. These findings suggest that although parenting style and feeding style are similar constructs, only feeding style was significantly associated with child BMI z-score. This supports the work of Hughes et al., 2005, Hughes et al., 2008 and provides a possible explanation for the non-significant findings of others (Blissett & Haycraft,

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the following Save the Children, USA partners – Vivica Kraak, Nutrition and Physical Activity Advisor, the Nutrition and Physical Activity Specialists, and community partners – all of whom assisted with the study recruitment and data collection. The authors are especially grateful for the children and parents who participated in this study. This research was supported by awards from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Public Health Dissertation Research

References (53)

  • J.L. Joyce et al.

    Parenting feeding restriction and child weight. The mediating role of child disinhibited eating and the moderating role of the parenting context

    Appetite

    (2009)
  • H. Kaur et al.

    Confirmatory factor analysis of the child-feeding questionnaire among parents of adolescents

    Appetite

    (2006)
  • D.M. Matheson et al.

    Do Mexican-American mothers’ food-related parenting practices influence their children's weight and dietary intake?

    Journal of the American Dietetic Association

    (2006)
  • H. Patrick et al.

    The benefits of authoritative feeding style: caregiver feeding styles and children's food consumption patterns

    Appetite

    (2005)
  • D. Spruijt-Metz et al.

    Longitudinal influence of mother's child-feeding practices on adiposity in children

    Journal of Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • T. van Strien et al.

    Perceived parental control of food intake is related to external, restrained and emotional eating in 7–12-year-old boys and girls

    Appetite

    (2007)
  • T. van Strien et al.

    Perceived parental food controlling practices are related to obesogenic or leptogenic child life style behaviors

    Appetite

    (2009)
  • L.S. Aiken et al.

    Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interactions

    (1991)
  • E.M. Arredondo et al.

    Is parenting style related to children's healthy eating and physical activity in Latino families?

    Health Education Research

    (2006)
  • S.E. Barlow

    Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report

    Pediatrics

    (2007)
  • R.M. Baron et al.

    The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, Part 2(4), pp....
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). 2000 CDC growth charts. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from...
  • H.R. Clark et al.

    How do parents’ child-feeding behaviours influence child weight? Implications for childhood obesity policy

    Journal of Public Health (Oxford)

    (2007)
  • K.W. Cullen et al.

    Socio-environmental influences on children's fruit, juice, and vegetable consumption as reported by parents: reliability and validity of measures

    Public Health Nutrition

    (2000)
  • N. Darling et al.

    Parenting style as context: an integrative model

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1993)
  • Cited by (122)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text