Research reportReward and punishment sensitivity in dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking women: Associations with family risk
Introduction
There is now a considerable body of evidence finding high levels of impulsivity in women who abuse alcohol, and in women with disordered eating, particularly those women whose eating patterns are characterised by binge eating (Dawe & Loxton, 2004; Nederkoorn, Van Eijs, & Jansen, 2004). Both binge eating and chronic alcohol abuse are characterised by compulsive approach behaviour. This is accompanied by a sense of loss of control following exposure to binge food/drink cues, suggesting a strong approach response in light of food and alcohol cues (Carter & Tiffany, 1999; Staiger, Dawe, & McCarthy, 2000). It has been proposed that a hypersensitivity to reward may be a common vulnerability to both disorders (Davis & Claridge, 1998; Loxton & Dawe, 2001). Elevated levels of trait anxiety have also been found in women with eating disorders (Fassino et al., 2002). The combination of high impulsivity/approach and trait anxiety/inhibition is in accordance with the binge–purge cycle in which food cravings and loss of control of eating alternate with periods of restrictive eating and avoidance of “forbidden foods” (Klump, McGue, & Iacono, 2002). The relationship between an anxious temperament and alcohol misuse is far less clear-cut. For example, in some samples, low trait anxiety has been found related to an increased risk of alcohol misuse (e.g., Franken & Muris, 2006; Masse & Tremblay, 1997). Yet, in other samples, high trait anxiety has been found to be related to alcohol problems (e.g., Pidcock, Fischer, Forthun, & West, 2000). Despite these disparate results, the vast majority of studies have not found an association between trait anxiety and alcohol misuse (Franken, Muris, & Georgieva, 2006; Grau & Ortet, 1999; Johnson, Turner, & Iwata, 2003; O’Connor & Colder, 2005).
Jeffrey Gray's biologically based theory of personality, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST; Gray & McNaughton, 2000), has been proposed as a useful model in understanding dysfunctional eating behaviour (Dawe & Loxton, 2004). RST consists of 3 motivational systems underlying individual differences in the tendency to approach appetitive stimuli and avoid aversive stimuli. The Behavioural Approach System (BAS) underpins individual differences in detecting and approaching rewarding stimuli. At the personality level this is referred to as Sensitivity to Reward. Individual differences in detecting and inhibiting behaviour in light of punishment reflects activation of 2 inter-related systems, the Fight, Flight, Freeze System (FFFS), which is sensitive to aversive stimuli, and the Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS), which is activated in approach-avoidance conflicts. Although representing 2 systems at the conceptual and biological levels, at the personality level individual differences in these 2 systems are referred to as “sensitivity to punishment” (Gray & McNaughton, 2000).
The underlying neural pathways (primarily mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways) involved in reward sensitivity are those that are involved in the reinforcing effectiveness of drugs of abuse, food, sex and other naturally rewarding activities (Fowles, 2001). Thus, it is not surprising that recent studies using specific measures of Gray's RST have found positive associations between reward sensitivity and dysfunctional eating and alcohol misuse (Davis, Strachan, & Berkson, 2004; Franken & Muris, 2005; Knyazev, Slobodskaya, Kharchenko, & Wilson, 2004; Loxton & Dawe, 2001). Additionally, Gray's punishment sensitivity reflects inhibited behaviour under potentially punishing conditions. Those individuals with eating disorders tend to be characterised by periods of restrictive eating and associated with fear of negative evaluation. Again, punishment sensitivity has been found to be associated with dysfunctional eating (Loxton & Dawe, 2001; Nederkoorn et al., 2004). Thus, RST appears to be a useful framework from which to study these 2 disorders.
Although individual differences in sensitivity to reward and punishment appear to be fruitful factors to further understanding the risk for disordered eating and alcohol misuse, personality traits are unlikely to be sole determinants in the development of disordered behaviour (Claridge & Davis, 2003). There is converging evidence that family factors influence the expression of both eating disorders and alcohol use problems. For example, women with Bulimia Nervosa/Binge-Eating Disorder describe their families as high in conflict, criticism and overprotectiveness, and low in cohesion, empathy and emotional warmth (Hodges, Cochrane, & Brewerton, 1998). Such family dynamics are similar to those reported by individuals with other psychiatric disorders, including substance abuse (Fairburn, Welch, Doll, Davies, & O’Connor, 1997). Thus, a dysfunctional family environment appears to be a relatively non-specific risk predisposing an individual to experience psychological problems. Other family factors found to be more specific risk factors in the development of dysfunctional eating include maternal disordered eating and parental attitude to appearance and weight (Fairburn et al., 1997; Laliberte, Boland, & Leichner, 1999). Similarly, parental alcohol problems have been consistently associated with alcohol problems in their children (Rhee et al., 2003).
However, not all children who come from at-risk families develop problems themselves. Other factors, such as personality, are likely to mediate or moderate parental pathology and family environment. Polivy and Herman (2002) have raised the question as to the exact mechanisms involved in the familial transmission of disordered behaviour. It is possible that personality traits act as pathway variables between dysfunctional family environments and disordered behaviour (i.e., personality mediates family risk). For instance, trait anxiety has been proposed as a potential mediating variable between a chaotic family environment and dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking in young adults. College women from a chaotic family have been found to be more harm avoidant, and in turn, more likely to abuse alcohol and engage in dysfunctional eating (Pidcock et al., 2000). The authors suggested that exposure to a stressful family background (e.g., parental alcohol abuse and/or a dysfunctional family environment) increases sensitivity to potential threat in the environment, and that alcohol and other substances may be used to alleviate elevated anxiety. Likewise, parental alcohol abuse has been found to be associated with environmental stress and increased adolescent negative affect, which in turn, was predictive of greater substance misuse (Chassin, Curren, Hussong, & Colder, 1996). However, no studies have tested whether heightened anxiety (i.e., punishment sensitivity) mediates a family history of disordered eating and daughters’ disordered eating.
Children of parents with alcohol problems, or from a dysfunctional family environment report higher levels of impulsiveness, and in turn, report greater drug and alcohol use and abuse (Sher, Walitzer, Wood, & Brent, 1991). Given the biological basis of reward sensitivity, and the heightened impulsivity in children of parents with alcohol problems, reward sensitivity may also act as a family-transmitted vulnerability to misuse alcohol and other reinforcing substances, such as dysfunctional eating. Again, no study has investigated whether impulsivity (i.e., reward sensitivity) mediates maternal dysfunctional eating and daughter's dysfunctional eating.
Alternatively, personality may moderate the relationship between a positive family history and the development of dysfunctional eating or alcohol problems. For instance, although having a family background in which there is an emphasis on weight and appearance has been found to be associated with an increased likelihood of disordered eating in daughters, anxious women from such families have reported a greater level of dysfunctional eating than non-anxious women (Davis, Shuster, Blackmore, & Fox, 2004). Likewise, impulsive, novelty-seeking men and women with dysfunctional family histories have been found to be at even greater risk for alcohol-related problems than low impulsive men and women from similar backgrounds (Sher, Trull, Bartholow, & Vieth, 1999). However, with the exception of Davis, Shuster et al. (2004), no other study has looked at possible interactions between impulsivity/anxiety and maternal eating on daughter's eating.
Although the above studies have made significant contributions to research investigating specific relationships between family risk and key personality traits in the development of alcohol use problems, only Pidcock et al. (2000) and Davis, Shuster et al. (2004) have assessed these associations with dysfunctional eating. More surprisingly, only Davis, Shuster et al. (2004) have assessed any aspect of family attitude to eating/weight as a specific family correlate of these relationships. Given the association between maternal eating and the development of dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviours in daughters, and evidence that maternal drinking may be a specific risk factor for daughters’ drinking, studies of family factors and disordered eating and drinking in women could be extended by including specific measures of maternal eating and drinking. As Mussell, Binford, and Fulkerson (2000) argue, research into eating disorders needs to move beyond studying individual risk factors to studying more complex interactions. Thus, the aim of the current study is to extend previous research using RST and empirically test reward and punishment sensitivity as possible mediators and moderators of family risk on dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking. The discovery of such relationships would assist in identifying women from specific family environments who may be at greater risk for disordered behaviour due to temperamental vulnerabilities.
Section snippets
Participants
Four hundred and forty-three university women completed the questionnaire package. Mean age was 23.51 (SD=8.03; range 17–53) with 85% aged 30 years or younger. Eighty-nine per cent of the sample was Caucasian, with fewer Indigenous Australian (2.5%), Asian (2.3%) and other (6.5%) students. The study was reviewed and approved by the University's Human Ethics Committee.
Procedure
Students were asked to participate in the study during scheduled lecture times and via advertisements throughout the university
Descriptive information
Table 1 displays descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations for variables measuring severity of alcohol use, disordered eating and personality traits. Due to the large number of inter-correlations and the increased risk of a type I error, an adjusted α level of .001 was used to indicate significant bivariate relationships. As found in previous research, the AUDIT was positively related to measures of dysfunctional eating. Not unexpectedly, parental drinking was associated with a more
Discussion
The purpose of the current study was to examine the relationships between the personality traits of reward and punishment sensitivity and family risk factors on self-reported dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking in a sample of university women. Heightened reward sensitivity was common to both women reporting dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking. Punishment sensitivity was associated with dysfunctional eating but not hazardous drinking. Punishment sensitivity was further found to
References (59)
- et al.
The measurement of individual differences in behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation systems: A comparison of personality scales
Personality and Individual Differences
(2003) - et al.
Do daughters with eating disorders agree with their parents’ perception of family functioning?
Comprehensive Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
The eating disorders as addiction: A psychobiological perspective
Addictive Behaviors
(1998) - et al.
Sensitivity to reward: Implications for overeating and overweight
Appetite
(2004) - et al.
Sensitivity to rewarding effects of food and exercise in the eating disorders
Comprehensive Psychiatry
(2002) - et al.
The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders
Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews
(2004) Behavioral approach system (BAS) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving
Personality and Individual Differences
(2002)- et al.
Individual differences in reward sensitivity are related to food craving and relative body weight in healthy women
Appetite
(2005) - et al.
BIS/BAS personality characteristics and college students’ substance use
Personality and Individual Differences
(2006) - et al.
Gray's model of personality and addiction
Addictive Behaviors
(2006)
Personality traits and alcohol consumption in a sample of non-alcoholic women
Personality and Individual Differences
The CAST-6: Development of a short-form of the children of alcoholics screening test
Addictive Behaviors
Restrained eaters act on impulse
Personality and Individual Differences
Hispanic and Anglo college women's risk factors for substance use and eating disorders
Addictive Behaviors
Responsivity to food cues in bulimic women and controls
Appetite
The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions
Personality and Individual Differences
Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
Amos 4.0 user's guide
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models
Sociological Methods & Research
Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research
Addiction
The relation of parental alcoholism to adolescent substance use: A longitudinal follow-up study
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Personality and psychological disorders
Looking good—Family focus on appearance and the risk for eating disorders
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Risk factors for bulimia nervosa. A community-based case-control study
Archives of General Psychiatry
Temperament and character profile of eating disorders: A controlled study with the temperament and character inventory
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Expectancy influences the operation of personality on behavior
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments
Psychological Assessment
Biological variables in psychopathology: A psychobiological perspective
Cited by (69)
An integrated review of fear and avoidance learning in anxiety disorders and application to eating disorders
2022, New Ideas in PsychologyParsing the link between reinforcement sensitivity theory and eating behavior: A systematic review
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Importantly, reward sensitivity scores predicted eating phenotypes and feeding patterns in a structural equation model, but not BMI. In other studies, conducted with adolescent and adult females, both reward and punishment sensitivity scores predicted drive for thinness and bulimia scores, suggesting a relationship between RST traits and calorie restriction (Loxton and Dawe, 2001, 2006). In a study with men, punishment sensitivity predicted bulimia symptoms and search for restrictive diets whereas sensitivity to reward predicted concern with body image and search for a healthy body (Mussap, 2006).
Neural vulnerability factors for obesity
2019, Clinical Psychology ReviewJunk food advertising moderates the indirect effect of reward sensitivity and food consumption via the urge to eat
2018, Physiology and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :In addition, the findings from this study have important clinical implications. As previous research has consistently demonstrated that heightened reward sensitivity is related to bulimia nervosa and anorexia-nervosa (purging-type; [3,20] and a range of eating pathology behaviours [12,15,30–32,35], urge to eat may be an important mechanism to target in clinical interventions. To inform these interventions, future research should extend upon the findings of this study by investigating if this approach-motivated state mediates the relationship between reward sensitivity and eating pathology behaviours in these vulnerable populations and determine if targeting it with existing cognitive behavioral and mindfulness techniques (e.g., urge surfing; [34]) reduces the occurrence of these behaviours.