Residential mobility and the family context: A developmental approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We modeled how the family context was associated with residential mobility.

  • Models were compared across early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence.

  • Moving was consistently associated with the family context across development.

  • Moving was indirectly associated with child behavior and achievement through the family context.

  • Associations varied across developmental periods.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the links between residential mobility and the family context, whether these links varied across developmental periods (early childhood, middle childhood, or adolescence), and how they were associated with children's achievement and behavioral outcomes. Longitudinal data from a diverse sample of over 1000 U.S. children were used to explore family structure (marital and employment change), process (quality of the home and maternal sensitivity and depression), and residential mobility. Results of structural equation models indicated that associations between residential mobility and family structure and process varied across developmental periods, with significant links found for family process in early childhood and structure in middle childhood and adolescence. We found evidence of indirect associations between residential mobility and children's outcomes through family process in early childhood and of a direct association with internalizing behaviors in adolescence. We provide implications for programs and policies for residentially mobile children.

Section snippets

Theoretical perspectives

We use bioecological theory and a developmental systems approach as a lens to consider children's residential mobility (Bronfenbrenner and Morris, 2006, Lerner, 2006). According to these perspectives, children are nested in multiple contexts and these contexts, in conjunction with the child, are systematically integrated. Children are not sole receivers of inputs with predictable outputs and instead simultaneously create and respond to their environment, forming dynamic bidirectional

Study design and sample

This study used data from the SECCYD (NICHD ECCRN, 2005 and http://secc.rti.org for details). Data collection began in ten sites across the U.S. in 1991, in Little Rock, AR; Irvine, CA; Lawrence, KS; Boston, MA; Philadelphia, PA; Pittsburgh, PA; Charlottesville, VA; Morganton, NC; Seattle, WA; and Madison, WI. Participants were recruited via hospital visits around the time of the child's birth. To be eligible for the study, the mother had to be at least 18 years of age, healthy, and conversant

Measurement model

As a first step, we developed a measurement model to determine that our family structure and process latent variables, and SES latent variable, were adequately modeled by our observed variables. Fit statistics indicate an excellent fit of the data to our proposed model, χ2 (105) = 183.98, p < .01; CFI = .982; RMSEA = .027; SRMR = .027.

SEM results for residential mobility and family context

To examine associations between the family structure and process contexts and residential mobility, a structural equation model linking family contexts, background

Discussion

The goal of this study was to examine associations between childhood residential mobility, the family context, and children's achievement and behavior across three developmental periods. We attempted to build on existing research by developing SEMs to test our proposed models using longitudinal data from a diverse sample of U.S. children. We discuss our results in terms of the relevance of family structure and process for children's residential mobility and by developmental period.

Acknowledgment

Support was provided by the William T. Grant Foundation. The NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development through a cooperative agreement (U10) that calls for a scientific collaboration between NICHD staff and participating investigators (Leventhal and Crosnoe were Co-PIs for Phase IV). We gratefully acknowledge the data set provided by this study and express our appreciation to NICHD

References (79)

  • P.D. Allison

    Missing data

    (2001)
  • N.M. Astone et al.

    Family structure, residential mobility, and school drop out: A research note

    Demography

    (1994)
  • K.A. Bollen

    Structural equations with latent variables

    (1989)
  • R.H. Bradley

    Providing a stimulating and supportive home environment for young children

    Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics

    (1987)
  • R.H. Bradley et al.

    The relation of the home environment, cognitive competence, and IQ among males and females

    Child Development

    (1980)
  • R.H. Bradley et al.

    Socioeconomic status and child development. [Review]

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2002)
  • C.P. Bradshaw et al.

    School transitions among military adolescents: A qualitative study of stress and coping

    School Psychology Review

    (2010)
  • U. Bronfenbrenner et al.

    The bioecological model of human development

  • R.D. Conger et al.

    An interactionist perspective on socioeconomic context of human development

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (2007)
  • T.D. Cook et al.

    Some ways in which neighborhoods, nuclear families, friendship groups, and schools jointly affect changes in early adolescent development

    Child Development

    (2002)
  • K.A. Crnic et al.

    Mothers' and fathers' perceptions of daily hassles of parenting across early childhood

    Journal of Marriage and Family

    (1991)
  • K. Crowder et al.

    Do residential conditions explain the relationship between living arrangements and adolescent behavior?

    Journal of Marriage and Family

    (2004)
  • S. Danziger et al.

    Labor market outcomes and the transition to adulthood

    The Future of Children

    (2010)
  • G.J. Duncan et al.

    Income effects across the life span: Integration and interpretation

  • V. Dupéré et al.

    Understanding the positive role of neighborhood socioeconomic advantage in achievement: The contribution of the home, child care and school environments

    Developmental Psychology

    (2010)
  • J.S. Eccles

    The development of children ages 6 to 14

    Future of Children

    (1999)
  • G.H. Elder

    The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development

    Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development

    (1995)
  • J.E. Fiel et al.

    Reducing school mobility: A randomized trial of a relationship-building intervention

    American Educational Research Journal

    (2013)
  • J.A. Graber et al.

    Transitions and turning points: Navigating the passage from childhood through adolescence

    Developmental Psychology

    (1996)
  • T. Grimbos et al.

    The relation between co-rumination, maternal depressive symptoms and child psychopathology

    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

    (2013)
  • J.E. Grusec et al.

    Socialization in the family: The role of parents

  • J. Hagan et al.

    New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children

    American Sociological Review

    (1996)
  • K. Hansen

    Moving house for education in the pre-school years

    British Educational Research Journal

    (2013)
  • R. Haveman et al.

    Child events and circumstances influencing high school completion

    Demography

    (1991)
  • D.L. Haynie et al.

    Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?

    Social Forces

    (2005)
  • D.L. Haynie et al.

    The company you keep: Adolescent mobility and peer behavior

    Sociological Inquiry

    (2006)
  • J.P. Hoffmann

    Family structure, community context, and adolescent problem behavior

    Journal of Youth and Adolescence

    (2006)
  • J.P. Hoffmann

    Family structure, community context, and adolescent problem behaviors

    Journal of Youth and Adolescence

    (2006)
  • C.S. Holupka et al.

    The housing and neighborhood conditions of America's children: Patterns and trends over four decades

    Housing Policy Debate

    (2011)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Predictors and consequences of school mobility in middle childhood

      2021, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
    • Does optimal parenting style help offspring maintain healthy weight into mid-life?

      2019, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other factors may also have important linkages to parenting styles and body weight but few studies have included them. For example, childhood familial characteristics such as family structure (Sokol et al., 2017), parental abuse (Danese and Tan, 2014), residential stability (Anderson et al., 2014; Jones, 2015) and family religiousness (Bornstein et al., 2017; Goeke-Morey and Cummings, 2017) have been linked with either parenting or children's risk of obesity. However, whether they may confound the association of parenting style with offspring body weight is understudied.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text