Original article
Computer-Aided Design of Customized Foot Orthoses: Reproducibility and Effect of Method Used to Obtain Foot Shape

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Telfer S, Gibson KS, Hennessy K, Steultjens MP, Woodburn J. Computer-aided design of customized foot orthoses: reproducibility and effect of method used to obtain foot shape.

Objective

To determine, for a number of techniques used to obtain foot shape based around plaster casting, foam box impressions, and 3-dimensional scanning, (1) the effect the technique has on the overall reproducibility of custom foot orthoses (FOs) in terms of inter- and intracaster reliability and (2) the reproducibility of FO design by using computer-aided design (CAD) software in terms of inter- and intra-CAD operator reliability for all these techniques.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

University laboratory.

Participants

Convenience sample of individuals (N=22) with noncavus foot types.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Parameters of the FO design (length, width at forefoot, width at rearfoot, and peak medial arch height), the forefoot to rearfoot angle of the foot shape, and overall volume match between device designs.

Results

For intra- and intercaster reliability of the different methods of obtaining the foot shape, all methods fell below the reproducibility quality threshold for the medial arch height of the device, and volume matching was <80% for all methods. The more experienced CAD operator was able to achieve excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.75) for all variables with the exception of forefoot to rearfoot angle, with overall volume matches of >87% of the devices.

Conclusions

None of the techniques for obtaining foot shape met all the criteria for excellent reproducibility, with the peak arch height being particularly variable. Additional variability is added at the CAD stage of the FO design process, although with adequate operator experience good to excellent reproducibility may be achieved at this stage. Taking only basic linear or angular measurement parameters from the device may fail to fully capture the variability in FO design.

Section snippets

Methods

Before the commencement of this study, ethical approval was awarded by the institutional ethics committee (application reference number B10/56) and all participants gave informed, written consent. A convenience sample of healthy subjects was recruited, with the sample size being determined by the time and cost constraints of the study. Potential participants were excluded if they had a rigid cavus foot, based on clinical assessment by a qualified podiatrist. All randomization orders for testing

Results

Twenty-two healthy participants, 10 men and 12 women, with mean age ± SD of 42.8±11.4 years, mean height ± SD of 1.72±0.1m, and mean weight ± SD of 75.2±13.5kg were recruited.

The forefoot to rearfoot angle could not be accurately determined from the scans of the foam box impressions; therefore, these measures have been omitted from the analysis for both foam box techniques. ICC values falling below the predetermined quality threshold of .75 for excellent agreement have been bolded in Table 2,

Discussion

Intracaster correlations were in line with those previously reported in the literature. Laughton et al14 investigated the use of 4 methods including plaster casting, sitting foam impression, and a partial weight-bearing scan and found all intrarater ICCs for rearfoot and forefoot widths to be above 0.9. Forefoot to rearfoot angle and medial arch height ICCs were lower; however, higher values for the plaster cast forefoot to rearfoot angle were reported compared with those presented here.

Conclusions

This study investigated 6 commonly used techniques for capturing foot shape, and none met all the criteria for excellent reproducibility. The peak arch height of the final device was particularly variable, with significant differences between most of the methods. The results for volume matching also suggest that taking simple linear or angular measures from the device may not fully capture the variability associated with the shape of the FO. Further variability is added to the overall process

References (18)

  • S. Telfer et al.

    A novel device for improving marker placement accuracy

    Gait Posture

    (2010)
  • B.S. Schrank et al.

    Dimensional accuracy of ankle-foot orthoses constructed by rapid customization and manufacturing framework

    J Rehabil Res Dev

    (2011)
  • D.G. Smith et al.

    The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics— current clinical models and a view to the future

    J Rehabil Res Dev

    (2001)
  • J.H. Pallari et al.

    Mass customization of foot orthoses for rheumatoid arthritis using selective laser sintering

    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng

    (2010)
  • B. Rogers et al.

    Advanced trans-tibial socket fabrication using selective laser sintering

    Prosthet Orthot Int

    (2007)
  • M.C. Faustini et al.

    An experimental and theoretical framework for manufacturing prosthetic sockets for transtibial amputees

    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng

    (2006)
  • D.N. Condie

    The modern era of orthotics

    Prosthet Orthot Int

    (2008)
  • M.M. Lusardi et al.
  • V. Chuter et al.

    Variability of neutral-position casting of the foot

    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (37)

  • 3D Surface Scanning of the Foot and Ankle

    2022, Foot and Ankle Biomechanics
  • Foot Orthoses

    2022, Foot and Ankle Biomechanics
  • Are custom-made foot orthoses of any interest on the treatment of foot pain for prolonged standing workers?

    2019, Applied Ergonomics
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is why Tsung et al. (2004) recommend that feet be scanned in semi-weight-bearing condition as a compromise solution so that the FO give enough support to the arches while avoiding the pain and discomfort that would occur were the FO too rigid (Salles and Gyi, 2013; CHEN et al., 1994). Nevertheless, the design and manufacturing processes of general foot orthoses present many variability factors connected to the techniques used to obtain foot shape (Telfer et al., 2012) or the practitioner-specific manufacturing processes (Chevalier and Chockalingam, 2012). Prolonged standing (Freitas et al., 2005), fatigue (Garcia et al., 2015; Ochsendorf et al., 2000) and pain (Pradels et al., 2011) all affect postural activity.

  • Effect of lateral wedged insoles on the knee internal contact forces in medial knee osteoarthritis

    2019, Gait and Posture
    Citation Excerpt :

    A soft thermoplastic polylactic acid material (soft-PLA) was chosen for its material properties (www.orbi-tech.de; density: 1.35 g/cm3, tensile strength: 16 MPa, strain at yield: 290%, Young’s modulus: 380 MPa, shore hardness: 92 A) and capability to produce semi-rigid devices. Previous successful studies have been conducted adopting the same material and a similar workflow [19,20]. All data were collected at the Human Performance Laboratory at Glasgow Caledonian University.

  • Comparison of plantar pressure distribution in CAD–CAM and prefabricated foot orthoses in patients with flexible flatfeet

    2017, Foot
    Citation Excerpt :

    Compared to traditional methods, this technology has resolved problems such as casting, cast modification, therapist measurement errors, and time-consuming processes. This method also facilitates the process of making foot orthoses [5–7]. Foot orthoses efficacy may be affected by construction method, design, type and material [2].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funded in part through the European Commission Framework Seven Program (grant no. NMP2-SE-2009-228893) as part of the A-Footprint project (http://www.afootprint.eu).

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

Reprints are not available from the author.

View full text