Cardiology/original research
Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule

Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, June 2010, Phoenix, AZ; and the American Heart Association, November 2008, New Orleans, LA.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.119Get rights and content

Study objective

Sgarbossa's rule, proposed for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block, has had suboptimal diagnostic utility. We hypothesize that a revised rule, in which the third Sgarbossa component (excessively discordant ST-segment elevation as defined by ≥5 mm of ST-segment elevation in the setting of a negative QRS) is replaced by one defined proportionally by ST-segment elevation to S-wave depth (ST/S ratio), will have better diagnostic utility for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) equivalent, using documented coronary occlusion on angiography as reference standard.

Methods

We collected admission ECGs for all patients with an acutely occluded coronary artery and left bundle branch block at 3 institutions. The ECGs of emergency department patients with chest pain or dyspnea and left bundle branch block, but without coronary occlusion, were used as controls. The R or S wave, whichever was most prominent, and ST segments, relative to the PR segment, were measured to the nearest 0.5 mm. The ST/S ratio was calculated for each lead that has both discordant ST deviation of greater than or equal to 1 mm and an R or S wave of opposite polarity; others were set to 0. The cut point for the most negative ST/S ratio with at least 90% specificity was determined. The revised rule is unweighted, requiring just 1 of 3 criteria. Diagnostic utilities of the original and revised Sgarbossa rules were computed and compared. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivities and specificities.

Results

The study and control groups included 33 and 129 ECGs, respectively. The cut point selected for relative discordant ST-segment elevation was −0.25. Excessive absolute discordant ST-segment elevation of 5 mm was present in at least one lead in 30% of ECGs in patients with confirmed coronary occlusion versus 9% of the control group, whereas excessive relative discordant ST-segment elevation less than −0.25 was present in 79% versus 9%. Sensitivity of the revised rule in which ST-segment elevation with an ST/S ratio less than or equal to −0.25 replaces ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 5 mm was significantly greater than either the weighted (P<.001) or unweighted (P=.008) Sgarbossa rule: 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76% to 98%) versus 52% (95% CI 34% to 69%) versus 67% (95% CI 48% to 82%). Specificity of the revised rule was lower than that of the weighted rule (P=.002) and similar to that of the unweighted rule (P=1.0): 90% (95% CI 83% to 95%) versus 98% (95% CI 93% to 100%) versus 90% (95% CI 83% to 95%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios for the revised rule were 9.0 (95% CI 8.0 to 10) and 0.1 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.3). The revised rule was significantly more accurate than both the weighted (16% difference; 95% CI 5% to 27%) and unweighted (12% difference; 95% CI 2% to 22%) Sgarbossa rules.

Conclusion

Replacement of the absolute ST-elevation measurement of greater than or equal to 5 mm in the third component of the Sgarbossa rule with an ST/S ratio less than −0.25 greatly improves diagnostic utility of the rule for STEMI. An unweighted rule using this criterion resulted in excellent prediction for acute coronary occlusion.

Introduction

Timely and accurate identification of acute coronary occlusion in the setting of ischemic symptoms is critical to initiating urgent angiography and appropriate reperfusion therapy. Although the increase or decrease of cardiac biomarker levels is essential to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, positive biomarker results alone do not differentiate ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from non-STEMI. ST elevation on the ECG is the primary indication for emergency reperfusion therapy; however, identification of STEMI in the setting of left bundle branch block remains challenging.1

In the setting of left bundle branch block, ST-segment elevation or ST-segment depression commonly occurs in the absence of acute myocardial infarction and is predictable in that the ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities are normally “discordant” to (in the opposite direction of) the majority of the QRS (Figure 1). “Concordant” is the term used when the ST segment or T wave is in the same direction as the QRS and is not normally observed in baseline (normal) left bundle branch block.

Sgarbossa et al proposed requiring at least 3 points from the following criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block: (1) concordant ST-segment elevation of 1 mm (0.1 mV) in at least 1 lead (5 points), (2) concordant ST-segment depression of at least 1 mm in leads V1 to V3 (3 points), or (3) excessively discordant ST-segment elevation, defined as greater than or equal to 5 mm of ST-segment elevation when the QRS result is negative (2 points)2 (Figure 2). There have been many evaluations of Sgarbossa's criteria, with variable methodologies and patient populations.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 In a systematic review, although specificity for greater than or equal to 3 Sgarbossa points was high (98%), sensitivity was only 20%.17 For a score greater than or equal to 2 (ie, the unweighted rule), the sensitivities in the studies ranged from 20% to 79%, and specificities ranged from 61% to 100%.

Two main issues may contribute to the low sensitivity of Sgarbossa's rule. First, all validating studies cited above used a reference standard of creatine kinase (CK) (with or without MB fraction) for acute myocardial infarction, not coronary occlusion by angiography, meaning non-STEMI (emergency reperfusion therapy unnecessary) and STEMI (emergency reperfusion required) were included in the acute myocardial infarction group. Second, anterior STEMI is most often diagnosed by ST-segment elevation in leads V1 to V4; however, in left bundle branch block, these leads normally already have discordant ST-segment elevation. Therefore, some means of assessment of excessive anterior ST-segment elevation is necessary to diagnose most anterior STEMI. Specifically, Sgarbossa's rule uses an absolute 5-mm cutoff for discordant ST-segment elevation when an ST-segment elevation proportional to the preceding QRS or S wave may be more useful. We sought to evaluate the performance of the Sgarbossa rule in patients with left bundle branch block and angiographic evidence of coronary occlusion. We hypothesized that changing the third component of the Sgarbossa rule to a proportional rule would improve its sensitivity and specificity.

Section snippets

Study Design and Setting

Data for this study were collected at 3 Minnesota hospitals: Hennepin County Medical Center, a trauma center in Minneapolis; at the Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, which has a large regional STEMI system; and at Fairview Southdale Hospital, a community hospital in suburban Minneapolis that also takes transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Institutional review board approval was obtained at all institutions.

Selection of Participants

ECGs from 2 groups of patients were

Characteristics of Study Subjects

At the 3 institutions, we identified 45 patients with acute coronary occlusion, 33 of whom had an ECG available for analysis. Overall, of 33 included cases, 27 had complete occlusion and 6 had incomplete occlusion and maximum cardiac troponin I level of at least 10 ng/mL. The culprit artery was the left anterior descending artery in 20 patients, the right coronary artery in 9, and the circumflex in 4.

A total of 129 patients met criteria for the control group. Of the 323 Hennepin County Medical

Limitations

It is likely that other patients with both left bundle branch block and an acute coronary occlusion were treated at the 3 institutions during this period and were not identified by our methods. All controls did not have angiograms; thus, we cannot rule out acute coronary occlusion, but this seems unlikely with our strict criteria. Some patients were excluded for lack of complete data, and how this might bias the study is unknown. Furthermore, we used angiographic reports. Our definition relied

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first and only study to use angiographic endpoints to evaluate the accuracy of the ECG in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines for the treatment of STEMI recommend reperfusion therapy for patients with chest pain and new, or presumably new, left bundle branch block.1, 23 The 2004 updated version suggests also using the Sgarbossa ECG

References (54)

  • E.M. Antman et al.

    2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2008)
  • M.G. Shlipak et al.

    Treatment and outcomes of left bundle branch block patients with myocardial infarction who present without chest pain

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2000)
  • F.M. Fesmire et al.

    Usefulness of automated serial 12-lead ECG monitoring during the initial emergency department evaluation of patients with chest pain

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1998)
  • F.M. Fesmire et al.

    Initial ECG in Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1989)
  • G.W. Rouan et al.

    Clinical characteristics and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in patients with initially normal or nonspecific electrocardiograms (a report from the Multicenter Chest Pain Study)

    Am J Cardiol

    (1989)
  • A.J. Tricomi et al.

    Missed opportunities for reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction (EDQMI) study

    Am Heart J

    (2008)
  • R.L. McNamara et al.

    Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • R.L. McNamara et al.

    Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 to 2002

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • I.J. Neeland et al.

    Evolving considerations in the management of patients with left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2012)
  • A.M. Chang et al.

    Lack of association between left bundle branch block and acute myocardial infarction in symptomatic ED patients

    Am J Emerg Med

    (2009)
  • S. Jain et al.

    Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction

    Am J Cardiol

    (2011)
  • M.H. Ellestad et al.

    The significance of lead strength on ST changes during treadmill stress tests

    J Electrocardiol

    (1992)
  • M. Hollenberg et al.

    Influence of R-wave amplitude on exercise-induced ST depression: need for a “gain factor” correlation when interpreting stress electrocardiograms

    Am J Cardiol

    (1985)
  • J.T. Santinga et al.

    The influence of lead strength on the ST changes with exercise electrocardiography (correlative study with coronary arteriography)

    J Electrocardiol

    (1977)
  • S.W. Smith

    T/QRS amplitude ratio best distinguishes the ST elevation of anterior left ventricular aneurysm from anterior acute myocardial infarction

    Am J Emerg Med

    (2005)
  • W. Beeman et al.

    T/QRS amplitude ratio is significantly higher in acute anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction than in previous myocardial infarction with persistent ST elevation (left ventricular aneurysm morphology): a validation (abstract 371)

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2011)
  • K.S. Stark et al.

    Quantification of ST-segment changes during coronary angioplasty in patients with left bundle branch block

    Am J Cardiol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    Please see page 767 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

    A feedback survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.

    A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

    Supervising editor: Judd E. Hollander, MD.

    Author contributions: SWS conceived and designed the study, oversaw the review of the data for inclusion and exclusions, and drafted the article. SWS, KWD, and DMD participated in data collection. KWD and TDH participated in study design. KWD participated in study conception, reviewed and secured the data, and made and supervised measurements. TDH created and maintains the database at Minneapolis Heart Institute. KWD, TDH, and LAP participated in article preparation. LAP, KWD, and SWS were responsible for data analysis, statistics, presentation of the data, and article review. SWS takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

    Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.

    Publication date: Available online August 31, 2012.

    View full text