Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 68, Issue 3, September 2004, Pages 435-443
Animal Behaviour

Sexual segregation in childhood: a review of evidence for two hypotheses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.023Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, I review the evidence associated with two hypotheses, both ultimately derived from sexual selection theory, put forth to explain social sexual segregation in human juveniles. More proximately, I posit that segregation is motivated by sex differences in body size, physical activity and competitiveness. The first hypothesis, the energetic/behavioural hypothesis, suggests that difference in energetics is a way in which males differentiate themselves from females and develop muscle and brain systems implicated in reproductive roles. The second hypothesis, the social roles hypothesis, suggests that segregation is related to learning male and female reproductive roles. The reviewed evidence supports the view that there are differences in energetics in male and female groups. With development, the vigorous behaviours shown by males take the form of specific social roles, related to dominance and competitiveness for males and maternal roles for females.

Section snippets

Origins of social segregation

Two hypotheses have been presented to explain the existence of social segregation (Ruckstuhl 1998). By way of preview, the ‘energetic/behavioural synchrony hypothesis’ assumes that segregation is based on sexual dimorphism in terms of body size. From this view, social segregation can be realized in one of two ways. First, the ‘energetics’ view posits that males and females choose different niches to maximize their physical growth and physical fitness. Males should be more active than females

Discussion

The evidence reviewed supports the claims that energetics and reproductive social roles are proximate causes of sexual segregation. Ultimately, these differences reflect sex differences in the reproductive roles of males and females. Due to the greater variance in male reproductive success, intrasexual competition for mates leads males to be physically larger and, consequently, more active and concerned with social dominance.

Males segregate because their reproductive roles bias them towards

Acknowledgements

A version of this paper was given at the Sexual Segregation Workshop, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, September 2002. I acknowledge comments on various drafts of this paper by J. Altringham, J. Archer, D. Bjorklund, C. Leaper, J. Mitani, S. Pellis, K. Ruckstuhl, P. K. Smith and anonymous referees.

References (67)

  • P.K. Smith et al.

    Effects of deprivation on exercise play in nursery school children

    Animal Behaviour

    (1980)
  • G.M. Alexander et al.

    Gender labels and play styles: their relative contributions to children's selection of playmates

    Child Development

    (1994)
  • R.D. Alexander

    Evolution of the human psyche

  • R.D. Alexander et al.

    Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates and humans

  • J. Archer et al.

    Sex and Gender

    (2002)
  • P.P.G. Bateson et al.

    Design for a Life: How Behaviour Develops

    (1999)
  • S.A. Berenbaum et al.

    Early androgens are related to childhood sex-typed toy preferences

    Psychological Science

    (1992)
  • P. Blatchford et al.

    The social context of school playground games: sex and ethnic differences, and changes over time after entry to junior school

    British Journal of Developmental Psychology

    (2003)
  • R. Boyd et al.

    Culture and the Evolutionary Process

    (1985)
  • G.M. Burghardt

    The evolutionary origins of play revisited: lessons from turtles

  • J.A. Byers et al.

    Refining the motor training hypothesis for the evolution of play

    American Naturalist

    (1995)
  • A. Campbell

    Staying alive: evolution, culture and women's intra-sexual aggression

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1999)
  • A. Campbell et al.

    Infants' visual preference for sex-congruent babies, children, toys, and activities: a longitudinal study

    British Journal of Developmental Psychology

    (2000)
  • D.W. Campbell et al.

    Sex differences in the activity level of infants

    Infant and Child Development

    (1999)
  • B. Chepko

    A preliminary study of the effects of play deprivation on young goats

    Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie

    (1971)
  • T.M. Clutton-Brock

    Selection in relation to sex

  • T.H. Clutton-Brock et al.

    Sexual segregation and density related changes in habitat use in male and female red deer

    Journal of Zoology

    (1987)
  • L. Conradt

    Measuring the degree of sexual segregation in group-living animals

    Journal of Animal Ecology

    (1998)
  • C. Darwin

    The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex

    (1871)
  • W.C. Eaton et al.

    Sex differences in human motor activity level

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1986)
  • W.C. Eaton et al.

    Are sex differences in child motor activity level a function of sex differences in maturational status?

    Child Development

    (1989)
  • W. Eaton et al.

    Scheme for observing activity

    Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

    (1987)
  • R.A. Fabes

    Physiological, emotional and behavioral correlates of gender segregation

  • Cited by (58)

    • Gendered-Peer Relationships in Educational Contexts

      2014, Advances in Child Development and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of the more recent explanations focus on the importance of children using the social categories of gender, whereas most of the historically popular explanations have focused on indirect causation, meaning that they invoke distal or indirect causes. For instance, evolutionary theorists suggest a distal cause, namely that children prepare for gender-typed adult roles through gender-segregated play early in life (Geary & Bjorklund, 2000; Pellegrini, 2004). Another common explanation involves indirect causation by arguing that children experience gender segregation because of sharing similar or compatible play styles with same-sex peers.

    • Play

      2012, Encyclopedia of Human Behavior: Second Edition
    • Prenatal hormones and childhood sex segregation: Playmate and play style preferences in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia

      2011, Hormones and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Alternatively, androgen may influence components of play style which then influence playmate selection. Behavioral compatibility hypotheses, for example, suggest that children choose playmates who are compatible, e.g. they have similar toy and activity preferences (Maccoby and Jacklin, 1987; Moller and Serbin, 1996; Pellegrini, 2004). From this perspective, one might consider that hormone influences on toy and/or activity preference may underlie sex-typical playmate selection.

    • The effect of winter sex ratio on immune function and condition in a differential migrant

      2011, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many studies have considered the effects of sexual selection on the evolution of sex differences particularly with respect to the role of mating systems [reviewed in 1]. Less widely appreciated are the sex differences influenced by a species' ecology, in which case selection may favor adaptive responses/traits that will reduce competition between the sexes or that better fit each sex to its abiotic and biotic environment [2,3]. For example, differences between the sexes in their habitat preferences and dispersal behavior can lead males and females to settle in different locations and give rise to sexual segregation [4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text