Coronary artery diseaseEvaluation of Contraindications and Efficacy of Oral Beta Blockade Before Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography
Section snippets
Methods
In consecutive patients clinically referred for CTA, information on HR before and during CTA, as well as beta-blocking medication use, were recorded. A total of 537 patients (298 men and 239 women, mean age 56 ± 18 years) were enrolled. The exclusion criteria for CTA investigation were (1) (supra)ventricular arrhythmias, (2) renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min), (3) known allergy to iodine contrast material, (4) severe claustrophobia, and (5) pregnancy. The main clinical
Results
In the total population referred for CTA (n = 537), the mean baseline HR was 67 ± 13 beats/min. At arrival, 254 patients (47%) had a baseline HR that was less than the target HR and did not require HR reduction. In contrast, 283 patients (53%) had a baseline HR greater than the target HR and required HR reduction. In the latter group, 98 patients (35%) were already using beta blockade as a part of their baseline medication. Of the 283 patients requiring HR reduction, beta blockade was
Discussion
The present study evaluated the use and efficacy of beta blockade 1 hour before CTA in 537 consecutive patients referred for CTA. In addition, the effect on image quality was investigated. The results of our study suggest that >1/2 of the patients presenting for CTA require HR reduction before examination. The presented data suggest that oral beta-blocking administration 1 hour before CTA effectively reduces HR in most cases. However, contraindications to beta blockade are present in a
References (28)
- et al.
Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography
Eur J Radiol
(2008) - et al.
Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries
Eur J Radiol
(2006) - et al.
Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis
Am J Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy
Eur J Radiol
(2008) - et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
(2008) - et al.
Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality
Acad Radiol
(2009) - et al.
In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT
Radiology
(2000) - et al.
Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality
Radiology
(2006)
Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique
Radiology
“In-house” pharmacological management for computed tomography coronary angiography: heart rate reduction, timing and safety of different drugs used during patient preparation
Eur Radiol
Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Cited by (35)
Effectiveness of point-of-care oral ivabradine for cardiac computed tomography
2021, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed TomographyBailout intravenous esmolol for heart rate control in cardiac computed tomography angiography
2016, Revista Portuguesa de CardiologiaCoronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Patient-related factors determining image quality using a second-generation 320-slice CT scanner
2016, International Journal of CardiologyComputed Tomography Imaging in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Part I: Rationale and Utility. An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI)
2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed TomographyCitation Excerpt :Pre-procedural medication can be used to decrease the overall heart rate or the variability with respiration. Different protocols for beta blockade have been described and are effective for decreasing the heart rate and thus the required radiated interval of the cardiac cycle.366–368 Protocols specific to children have been described with effective heart rate control and excellent safety.10,369
Dr. de Graaf is co-supported by the Dutch Technology Foundation STW (Utrecht, The Netherlands), Applied Science Division of The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Den Haag, The Netherlands) and grant 10084 from the Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs. Dr. van Velzen is supported by grant 2007B223 from The Netherlands Heart Foundation (The Hague, The Netherlands). Dr. Schalij has received research grants from Boston Scientific (Natick, Massachusetts), Medtronic (Minneapolis, Minnesota), and Biotronik (Berlin, Germany). Dr. Bax has received research grants from Medtronic (Minneapolis, Minnesota), Boston Scientific (Natick, Massachusetts), Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging (New York, New York), St. Jude Medical (St. Paul, Minnesota), GE Healthcare (Chalfont St. Giles, United Kingdom), Biotronik (Berlin, Germany), and Edwards Lifesciences (Irvine, California).