ArticleAssessing multiple risk behaviors in primary care: Screening issues and related concepts
Introduction
During the past 25 years, the public health concepts of screening and early intervention have gained popularity in medical settings, in part because of the apparent success of preventive services for the early detection of diseases such as stroke, hypertension, cervical cancer, and phenylketonuria.1 With the progress in early intervention for specific diseases, there has been increasing interest in screening for behavioral risk factors in patients likely to develop a variety of preventable medical conditions resulting from poor health habits. By broadening the base of medical care to include behavioral risk factors, a considerable amount of mortality, morbidity, and disability could be prevented before serious health problems have time to develop.
This paper reviews scientific, conceptual, and practical issues related to the identification of behavioral risk factors in primary care. The paper includes both a literature review and an analysis of the feasibility of screening from a public health perspective, giving special attention to four health risk behaviors: cigarette smoking, alcohol misuse, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet.
In this paper, screening is a procedure designed to identify people who have, or who are at risk of having, an illness, disease or disorder.2 It is important to distinguish screening from diagnosis, which is the process of identifying and labeling specific diseases or psychiatric disorders. Screening is a preliminary procedure to determine who is eligible for further assessment, but it can also be used to identify patients who are likely to benefit from immediate interventions (e.g., smoking cessation) or preventive counseling because they are considered to be at risk for serious medical problems. When screening results in the confirmed diagnosis of a medical condition, it is called screening for case finding. When screening identifies persons at risk, it is called screening for risk factors.2
The literature on the early identification of behavioral risk factors draws from two traditions that are important to distinguish. The first is the medical model, which is interested primarily in the presence or absence of specific disease conditions. The typical criteria for the evaluation of a screening test in this model are derived from the epidemiologic concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. The second model is health risk appraisal (HRA), which is less related to clinical medicine than to the public health concepts of health promotion and disease prevention. HRA is interested primarily in the early identification of health risk factors that are linked to a variety of diseases and other medical conditions. The typical criteria for the evaluation of an HRA are reliability and validity, psychometric concepts drawn from psychological measurement. In contrast to the detection of the presence or absence of a risk factor, HRA usually measures multiple risk factors along a continuum of severity and combines them to produce a risk index.
In this paper, we focus on screening for the presence of four behavioral risk factors (risk behaviors) that have special relevance to the health of any population: cigarette smoking (and other forms of nicotine use); alcohol misuse; physical inactivity; and dietary patterns, including the amount and type of food intake. The rationale for selecting these four risk factors is both practical and theoretical. From a practical perspective, these behaviors account for a substantial proportion of the burden of disease and disability throughout the world. The World Health Organization3 estimates that tobacco smoking, alcohol misuse, physical inactivity, and poor diet are among the top five contributors to disease and injury worldwide. In the United States it has been estimated that behavioral factors are implicated in 50% of all deaths,4 with the “big four” accounting for most of the mortality. With advances in behavior change, it is now possible to achieve substantial improvements in health through the early identification of behavioral risk factors.5 Although there are a variety of ways to change health behavior (including product regulations, environmental design, and health communications), one of the most obvious approaches is the widespread application of clinical preventive services in healthcare settings.1
A second reason for selecting these four risk behaviors is their apparent concentration in individuals and populations where mortality rates are high. On an individual level, smoking and heavy drinking tend to co-occur,6 and inactivity is often associated with obesity and poor dietary habits.7 At the level of populations, these four behavioral risk factors are more prevalent in communities and population groups characterized by lower socioeconomic status, minority group membership, and other indicators of social disadvantage. Because these risk factors are concentrated in individuals and population groups, it may be possible to target public health programs more efficiently to achieve the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people.
A third reason for our focus on multiple risk behaviors is that in general, the risk of most chronic diseases and other medical conditions increases in proportion to the number of risk behaviors that the individual practices.8 For example, the effects of smoking and heavy drinking on oral cancer tend to be synergistic.9
Section snippets
Screening tests: A selective review and critique
The rapid development of behavioral risk factor assessment procedures required us to restrict our review to a small selection of representative screening tests. We therefore focused on standardized tests or clinical procedures supported by peer-reviewed publications demonstrating that the test had sufficient accuracy to avoid producing large numbers of false-positive and false-negative results. In addition, we required that the test be capable of detecting the target conditions earlier than
Tobacco and nicotine
Effective methods for treating nicotine addiction have been available for some time,1 and major efforts have been made to increase the detection of cigarette smoking and related risk behaviors (e.g., use of spit tobacco and cigars). Most clinical screening for the use of nicotine products begins with a brief smoking history, including whether the patient ever smoked, whether they smoke or use nicotine products currently, how long they have smoked and whether they have ever tried to quit. Under
Hazardous alcohol use and problem drinking
Alcohol screening has been gaining popularity in healthcare settings because of new screening technologies, encouraging research findings, expert committee recommendations, and mandates to conduct routine alcohol screening.17, 18 Table 2 summarizes representative screening tests. One of the first alcohol screening procedures, the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST)19 consists of 24 yes/no questions that list signs and symptoms of chronic alcoholism. It has been criticized because of its
Physical inactivity
Table 3 describes physical activity instruments31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and one physical activity monitor,40 and a clinical rating.40 Most measures focus on specific activities but they tend to underestimate others.42 For example, most of the survey measures focus on leisure and sports activities, and exclude work-related and housework activities. This is important as these activities account for a great amount of energy expenditure in certain populations (e.g., racial and ethnic
Dietary behavior
Table 4 summarizes information about screening tests designed to detect unhealthy eating patterns, poor dietary habits and related risk factors for obesity and eating disorders.51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 The measures tend to focus on specific aspects of the diet. Some measures focus on the most important aspects of diet, such as the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients,52 and the instrument developed by Hopkins et al.57 Accuracy studies for these measures tend to
Health assessment tools and combined screening tests
Since the 1950s, HRA has been used by family doctors to address risk factors for premature death with their patients. The results of large epidemiologic trials, such as the Framingham Study, provided an impetus for family practitioners to translate research findings into a framework that would support decision making around risk factor reduction. This work resulted in the first book on HRA, How to Practice Prospective Medicine, by Robbins and Hall68 in 1970. In addition to the evolution of HRA,
Toward a public health approach
This review has shown that the concept of behavioral risk has gained purpose and clarity with an increasing scientific understanding of the linkage between behavior and health. In addition to incontrovertible evidence for the health impacts of the four risk factors discussed in this paper, there is also growing evidence that these risk factors can be measured accurately and identified using both medical types of screening tests and HRA instruments. Some of these tests have been developed for
Acknowledgements
Preparation of this article was supported by a grant from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
References (86)
- et al.
Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factorsGlobal Burden of Disease Study
Lancet
(1997) - et al.
Prevalence of multiple chronic disease risk factors2001 National Health Interview Survey
Am J Prev Med
(2004) - et al.
Behavioral risk factors among members of a health maintenance organization
Prev Med
(2001) - et al.
Predicting smoking cessation with self-reported measures of nicotine dependenceFTQ, FTND, and HSI
Drug Alcohol Depend
(1994) Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment
Addict Behav
(1978)- et al.
A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies
Am J Clin Nutr
(1982) - et al.
The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE)development and evaluation
J Clin Epidemiol
(1993) - et al.
Validation for MEDFICTS, a dietary assessment instrument for evaluating adherence to total and saturated fat recommendations of the National Cholesterol Education Program Step 1 and Step 2 diets
J Am Diet Assoc
(2001) - et al.
REAP and WAVEnew tools to rapidly assess/discuss nutrition with patients
J Nutr
(2003) - et al.
Patterns of dietary behavior associated with selecting diets low in fatreliability and validity of a behavioral approach to dietary assessment
J Am Diet Assoc
(1990)
Predictive value of a short dietary questionnaire for changes in serum lipids in high-risk Utah families
Am J Clin Nutr
Evaluation of 2 brief instruments and a food- frequency questionnaire to estimate daily number of servings of fruit and vegetables
Am J Clin Nutr
A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake
Am J Prev Med
Correlates of serum alpha- and gamma-tocopherol in the Women's Health Initiative
Ann Epidemiol
A very low-fat diet is not associated with improved lipoprotein profiles in men with a predominance of large, low-density lipoproteins
Am J Clin Nutr
Use of urine cotinine to validate smoking self-reports in U.S. Navy recruits
Addict Behav
Guide to clinical preventive services
Screening in chronic disease
Actual causes of death in the United States
JAMA
The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domainsa systematic review
Addiction
Alcohol and tobacco: From basic science to clinical practice
Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking increase the frequency of p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer
Cancer Res
Behavioral assessment
Measuring the heaviness of smokingusing self-reported time to first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day
Br J Addict
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
Br J Addict
Objective measures
Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems
Alcohol screening and brief interventiondissemination strategies for medical practice and public health
Addiction
The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Testthe quest for a new diagnostic instrument
Am J Psychiatry
A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST)
J Stud Alcohol
Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire
JAMA
Identification of alcohol abuse using laboratory tests and a history of trauma
Ann Intern Med
The AUDIT alcohol consumption questionsreliability, validity, and responsiveness to change in older male primary care patients
Alcohol Clin Exp Res
Markers to detect drinking during pregnancy
Alcohol Res Health
New assessment tools for risk drinking during pregnancyT-ACE, TWEAK, and others
Alcohol Health Res World
Use of the TWEAK test in screening for alcoholism/heavy drinking in three populations
Alcohol Clin Exp Res
Beyond alcoholismidentifying older, at-risk drinkers in primary care
J Stud Alcohol
Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. II
Addiction
AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care
10th Special report to the U.S. Congress on alcohol and health. Highlights from current research
Measuring physical activity with the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Med Sci Sports Exerc
The development of self-administered physical activity surveys for 4th grade students
Res Q Exerc Sport
Cited by (57)
Assessing efficacy of a web-based smoking cessation tool - QuitAdvisorMD: Protocol for a practice-based, clustered, randomized control trial
2024, Contemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsSubstance use patterns through early adulthood: Results for youth with and without chronic conditions
2016, American Journal of Preventive MedicineLow conscientiousness and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality over 17 years: Whitehall II cohort study
2012, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchHealth Risk Behaviour Inventory Validation and its Association with Self-regulatory Dispositions
2022, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical SettingsPatient perspectives on tablet-based technology to collect risk factor information in primary care
2021, BMC Family Practice