Article
Assessing multiple risk behaviors in primary care: Screening issues and related concepts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Abstract

The concept of behavioral risk refers to health behaviors that increase the likelihood of a variety of illness conditions. With increased scientific research, it has become clear that this concept is useful in understanding the linkage between behavior and health. This paper reviews scientific, conceptual, and practical issues related to the identification of health risk behaviors in primary care. It includes both a literature review and an analysis of the feasibility of screening and health risk appraisal from a public health perspective, giving special attention to four behavioral risk factors: cigarette smoking, alcohol misuse, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet. The review indicates that there are a wide variety of acceptable screening tests that can be used for population screening programs, and a large number of health risk appraisal instruments to employ in medical and work settings where preventive health services are available. Given the variety of available assessment procedures, the choice of a given instrument will depend on the target population, the purpose of the program, the time available for assessment, and a number of other practical considerations, such as cost. Multiple risk factor screening is feasible, but there is no single instrument or procedure that is optimal for all risk factors or populations. Based on the results of this review, the specific test or combination of tests is less important than the use of screening to make both patients and healthcare providers more aware of the critical importance of monitoring behavioral risk factors on a routine basis. We conclude that while further research and development work needs to be done, sufficient progress has been made to warrant a more ambitious effort that would bring behavioral risk factor screening into the mainstream of preventive medicine and public health.

Introduction

During the past 25 years, the public health concepts of screening and early intervention have gained popularity in medical settings, in part because of the apparent success of preventive services for the early detection of diseases such as stroke, hypertension, cervical cancer, and phenylketonuria.1 With the progress in early intervention for specific diseases, there has been increasing interest in screening for behavioral risk factors in patients likely to develop a variety of preventable medical conditions resulting from poor health habits. By broadening the base of medical care to include behavioral risk factors, a considerable amount of mortality, morbidity, and disability could be prevented before serious health problems have time to develop.

This paper reviews scientific, conceptual, and practical issues related to the identification of behavioral risk factors in primary care. The paper includes both a literature review and an analysis of the feasibility of screening from a public health perspective, giving special attention to four health risk behaviors: cigarette smoking, alcohol misuse, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet.

In this paper, screening is a procedure designed to identify people who have, or who are at risk of having, an illness, disease or disorder.2 It is important to distinguish screening from diagnosis, which is the process of identifying and labeling specific diseases or psychiatric disorders. Screening is a preliminary procedure to determine who is eligible for further assessment, but it can also be used to identify patients who are likely to benefit from immediate interventions (e.g., smoking cessation) or preventive counseling because they are considered to be at risk for serious medical problems. When screening results in the confirmed diagnosis of a medical condition, it is called screening for case finding. When screening identifies persons at risk, it is called screening for risk factors.2

The literature on the early identification of behavioral risk factors draws from two traditions that are important to distinguish. The first is the medical model, which is interested primarily in the presence or absence of specific disease conditions. The typical criteria for the evaluation of a screening test in this model are derived from the epidemiologic concepts of sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. The second model is health risk appraisal (HRA), which is less related to clinical medicine than to the public health concepts of health promotion and disease prevention. HRA is interested primarily in the early identification of health risk factors that are linked to a variety of diseases and other medical conditions. The typical criteria for the evaluation of an HRA are reliability and validity, psychometric concepts drawn from psychological measurement. In contrast to the detection of the presence or absence of a risk factor, HRA usually measures multiple risk factors along a continuum of severity and combines them to produce a risk index.

In this paper, we focus on screening for the presence of four behavioral risk factors (risk behaviors) that have special relevance to the health of any population: cigarette smoking (and other forms of nicotine use); alcohol misuse; physical inactivity; and dietary patterns, including the amount and type of food intake. The rationale for selecting these four risk factors is both practical and theoretical. From a practical perspective, these behaviors account for a substantial proportion of the burden of disease and disability throughout the world. The World Health Organization3 estimates that tobacco smoking, alcohol misuse, physical inactivity, and poor diet are among the top five contributors to disease and injury worldwide. In the United States it has been estimated that behavioral factors are implicated in 50% of all deaths,4 with the “big four” accounting for most of the mortality. With advances in behavior change, it is now possible to achieve substantial improvements in health through the early identification of behavioral risk factors.5 Although there are a variety of ways to change health behavior (including product regulations, environmental design, and health communications), one of the most obvious approaches is the widespread application of clinical preventive services in healthcare settings.1

A second reason for selecting these four risk behaviors is their apparent concentration in individuals and populations where mortality rates are high. On an individual level, smoking and heavy drinking tend to co-occur,6 and inactivity is often associated with obesity and poor dietary habits.7 At the level of populations, these four behavioral risk factors are more prevalent in communities and population groups characterized by lower socioeconomic status, minority group membership, and other indicators of social disadvantage. Because these risk factors are concentrated in individuals and population groups, it may be possible to target public health programs more efficiently to achieve the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people.

A third reason for our focus on multiple risk behaviors is that in general, the risk of most chronic diseases and other medical conditions increases in proportion to the number of risk behaviors that the individual practices.8 For example, the effects of smoking and heavy drinking on oral cancer tend to be synergistic.9

Section snippets

Screening tests: A selective review and critique

The rapid development of behavioral risk factor assessment procedures required us to restrict our review to a small selection of representative screening tests. We therefore focused on standardized tests or clinical procedures supported by peer-reviewed publications demonstrating that the test had sufficient accuracy to avoid producing large numbers of false-positive and false-negative results. In addition, we required that the test be capable of detecting the target conditions earlier than

Tobacco and nicotine

Effective methods for treating nicotine addiction have been available for some time,1 and major efforts have been made to increase the detection of cigarette smoking and related risk behaviors (e.g., use of spit tobacco and cigars). Most clinical screening for the use of nicotine products begins with a brief smoking history, including whether the patient ever smoked, whether they smoke or use nicotine products currently, how long they have smoked and whether they have ever tried to quit. Under

Hazardous alcohol use and problem drinking

Alcohol screening has been gaining popularity in healthcare settings because of new screening technologies, encouraging research findings, expert committee recommendations, and mandates to conduct routine alcohol screening.17, 18 Table 2 summarizes representative screening tests. One of the first alcohol screening procedures, the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST)19 consists of 24 yes/no questions that list signs and symptoms of chronic alcoholism. It has been criticized because of its

Physical inactivity

Table 3 describes physical activity instruments31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and one physical activity monitor,40 and a clinical rating.40 Most measures focus on specific activities but they tend to underestimate others.42 For example, most of the survey measures focus on leisure and sports activities, and exclude work-related and housework activities. This is important as these activities account for a great amount of energy expenditure in certain populations (e.g., racial and ethnic

Dietary behavior

Table 4 summarizes information about screening tests designed to detect unhealthy eating patterns, poor dietary habits and related risk factors for obesity and eating disorders.51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61 The measures tend to focus on specific aspects of the diet. Some measures focus on the most important aspects of diet, such as the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients,52 and the instrument developed by Hopkins et al.57 Accuracy studies for these measures tend to

Health assessment tools and combined screening tests

Since the 1950s, HRA has been used by family doctors to address risk factors for premature death with their patients. The results of large epidemiologic trials, such as the Framingham Study, provided an impetus for family practitioners to translate research findings into a framework that would support decision making around risk factor reduction. This work resulted in the first book on HRA, How to Practice Prospective Medicine, by Robbins and Hall68 in 1970. In addition to the evolution of HRA,

Toward a public health approach

This review has shown that the concept of behavioral risk has gained purpose and clarity with an increasing scientific understanding of the linkage between behavior and health. In addition to incontrovertible evidence for the health impacts of the four risk factors discussed in this paper, there is also growing evidence that these risk factors can be measured accurately and identified using both medical types of screening tests and HRA instruments. Some of these tests have been developed for

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this article was supported by a grant from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

References (86)

  • P.N Hopkins et al.

    Predictive value of a short dietary questionnaire for changes in serum lipids in high-risk Utah families

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1989)
  • F.E Thompson et al.

    Evaluation of 2 brief instruments and a food- frequency questionnaire to estimate daily number of servings of fruit and vegetables

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2000)
  • G Block et al.

    A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake

    Am J Prev Med

    (2000)
  • E White et al.

    Correlates of serum alpha- and gamma-tocopherol in the Women's Health Initiative

    Ann Epidemiol

    (2001)
  • D.M Dreon et al.

    A very low-fat diet is not associated with improved lipoprotein profiles in men with a predominance of large, low-density lipoproteins

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1999)
  • T.L Pokorski et al.

    Use of urine cotinine to validate smoking self-reports in U.S. Navy recruits

    Addict Behav

    (1994)
  • Guide to clinical preventive services

    (1996)
  • A.S Morrison

    Screening in chronic disease

    (1985)
  • J.M McGinnis et al.

    Actual causes of death in the United States

    JAMA

    (1993)
  • C Dunn et al.

    The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domainsa systematic review

    Addiction

    (2001)
  • J.B Fertig et al.

    Alcohol and tobacco: From basic science to clinical practice

    (1995)
  • S Ahrendt et al.

    Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking increase the frequency of p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

    Cancer Res

    (2000)
  • S Shiffman

    Behavioral assessment

  • T.F Heatherton et al.

    Measuring the heaviness of smokingusing self-reported time to first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day

    Br J Addict

    (1989)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • T.F Heatherton et al.

    The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire

    Br J Addict

    (1991)
  • L.T Kozlowski et al.

    Objective measures

  • Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems

    (1990)
  • T.F Babor et al.

    Alcohol screening and brief interventiondissemination strategies for medical practice and public health

    Addiction

    (2000)
  • M.L Selzer

    The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Testthe quest for a new diagnostic instrument

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1971)
  • M.L Selzer et al.

    A self-administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST)

    J Stud Alcohol

    (1975)
  • J.A Ewing

    Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire

    JAMA

    (1984)
  • H.A Skinner et al.

    Identification of alcohol abuse using laboratory tests and a history of trauma

    Ann Intern Med

    (1984)
  • K.A Bradley et al.

    The AUDIT alcohol consumption questionsreliability, validity, and responsiveness to change in older male primary care patients

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (1998)
  • C.F Bearer

    Markers to detect drinking during pregnancy

    Alcohol Res Health

    (2001)
  • M Russell

    New assessment tools for risk drinking during pregnancyT-ACE, TWEAK, and others

    Alcohol Health Res World

    (1994)
  • A.W Chan et al.

    Use of the TWEAK test in screening for alcoholism/heavy drinking in three populations

    Alcohol Clin Exp Res

    (1993)
  • A.A Moore et al.

    Beyond alcoholismidentifying older, at-risk drinkers in primary care

    J Stud Alcohol

    (2002)
  • J.B Saunders et al.

    Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. II

    Addiction

    (1993)
  • T.F Babor et al.

    AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care

    (2001)
  • 10th Special report to the U.S. Congress on alcohol and health. Highlights from current research

    (2000)
  • R.C Brownson et al.

    Measuring physical activity with the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2000)
  • J.F Sallis et al.

    The development of self-administered physical activity surveys for 4th grade students

    Res Q Exerc Sport

    (1993)
  • Cited by (57)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text