The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey☆
Introduction
Over the last few years, the use of social media has become an increasingly popular leisure activity in many countries across the world (Kuss & Griffiths, 2011). Individuals visit social media sites to engage in many different types of entertainment and social activity including playing games, socializing, passing time, communicating, and posting pictures (Allen et al., 2014, Ryan et al., 2014). Although this has quickly become a normal modern phenomenon (boyd & Ellison, 2007), concerns have been raised regarding the potential addictive use of social media (e.g., Andreassen, 2015, Griffiths et al., 2014). Such excessive and compulsive use has been explained by general addiction models (Griffiths, 2005) and defined accordingly as “being overly concerned about social media, driven by an uncontrollable motivation to log on to or use social media, and devoting so much time and effort to social media that it impairs other important life areas” (Andreassen & Pallesen, 2014, p. 4054).
The term ‘Internet addiction’ has been criticized for being too unspecific in terms of content. Consequently, some scholars have suggested content-related ‘addiction subtypes’ such as ‘cybersexual addiction’, ‘social media addiction’, ‘net compulsions’ (e.g., stock trading, gambling, shopping), ‘information overload’, and ‘computer addiction’ (e.g., games, programming) (Young, 1999, Young, 2015).
When drawing the line between addictive and non-addictive (e.g., excessive, enthusiastic) behaviors, scholars use specific addiction criteria (Griffiths, 2005). Accordingly, addictive social media use should thus be manifested by being preoccupied by social media (salience), using social media in order to reduce negative feelings (mood modification), gradually using social media more and more in order to get the same pleasure from it (tolerance/craving), suffering distress if prohibited from using social media (withdrawal), sacrificing other obligations and/or causing harm to other important life areas because of the social media use (conflict/functional impairment), and desiring or attempting to control the use of social media without success (relapse/loss of control).
Consequently, as problematic social media use may represent a specific form of ‘Internet addiction’, the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale was specifically developed in order to assess this behavior using the aforementioned addiction criteria (Andreassen, Torsheim, Brunborg, & Pallesen, 2012). Although the scale has demonstrated reliable and valid psychometric properties across several studies (e.g., Andreassen et al., 2012, Andreassen et al., 2013, Phanasathit et al., 2015, Wang et al., 2015), a generic instrument capturing the totality of all social network sites, as opposed to measuring addictive use of one specific social network site only (i.e., Facebook), has been called for (Griffiths et al., 2014).
Some studies have reported higher levels of addictive social media use among men (e.g., Çam and Isbulan, 2012, Ryan et al., 2014). However, research has more consistently shown that addictive use of social media is more prevalent among women than men (Andreassen, 2015, Griffiths et al., 2014), and it has been suggested that women are more inclined to develop addictive behaviors towards activities involving social interaction (Andreassen et al., 2013, Kuss et al., 2014, Van Deursen et al., 2015). Furthermore, studies also report higher scores on social media addiction scales in younger compared to older people (e.g., Andreassen et al., 2012, Kuss et al., 2014). This has good face validity as these online platforms play a crucial role in the leisure and social lives of adolescents and young adults (Allen et al., 2014). Young people have quickly become accustomed to being constantly “online”, and appear to adapt to new technologies faster than their older counterparts (Prensky, 2001). In addition, social media may represent an arena where the younger generation can explore and develop their identities and culture without interruption from parents or those in a position of authority (Andreassen, 2015, Mazzoni and Iannone, 2014).
Research also suggests that individuals that are not in a personal relationship are more prone to developing addictive social media use than people who have partners (Kuss et al., 2014). Again, this has good face validity as sites that promote social interaction may represent ground for meeting potential partners, or serving as an important social function along with feelings of belongingness (Andreassen et al., 2014, Ryan et al., 2014). Taken together, in the present study, it is hypothesized that individuals that are of younger age, women, and not in a relationship will score higher than their corresponding counterparts on a social media addiction scale (Hypothesis 1).
Research indicates that personality plays a role in addictive use of social media (e.g., Andreassen et al., 2012, Andreassen et al., 2013, Hong et al., 2014, Wilson et al., 2010). The few studies exploring individual differences in terms of narcissism have found it to be positively associated to different online social networking activities (La Barbera et al., 2009, Malik and Khan, 2015, Ryan and Xenos, 2011, Wang et al., 2012). This appears to be meaningful as social media use allows individuals to express their ambitions and show their successes to a potentially large audience, and to obtain highly visible rewards and recognition through “likes” and positive comments from other social media users. Most contemporary studies refer to narcissism as a relatively broad behavioral trait domain, expressed by, among others, self-centered grandiosity, arrogance, manipulativeness, and similar features (Alarcón & Sarabia, 2012). However, the complexity of the narcissism construct needs highlighting.
Narcissistic personality disorder, a pathological form of narcissism, is formally recognized by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in terms of high levels of self-importance, fantasies of unlimited success, feeling special and unique, lack of empathy, envy, and arrogance (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). However, more moderate and non-clinical levels of narcissistic traits have sometimes been viewed as healthy by providing an outlet for self-confidence and self-assertion (Campbell et al., 2000, Muller, 2014). Either way, as social media may represent a gratifying medium for individuals with elevated narcissistic traits in particular, it is hypothesized that narcissism will be positively related to addictive use of social media in the present study (Hypothesis 2).
Core self-evaluations (e.g., self-esteem) also appear to play a role in addictive social media use (Andreassen, 2015). Such evaluations may involve core beliefs, attributions, schemata, and automatic thoughts – and that have the power to activate behavior in general (Beck, 1995), including social media activity. Hence, if an individual thinks “I am not likable” or “I have poor social skills” – while at the same time believing that having a large number of friends or followers will change such self-evaluations – this may facilitate addictive social media participation. In line with this, previous research has shown that people with low self-esteem regard social media as a safer place to express themselves than people with high self-esteem (Forest & Wood, 2012), and a negative relationship between self-esteem and addictive use of social media has been reported (Hong et al., 2014, Malik and Khan, 2015, Wang et al., 2012, Wilson et al., 2010). In short, it is hypothesized in the present study that self-esteem will be negatively associated with symptoms of addictive social media use (Hypothesis 3).
Against this theoretical and empirical background, data stemming from a large sample were analyzed in order to investigate whether demographics and dispositional traits were associated with addictive use of social media (Hypotheses 1–3). Although these hypotheses have to some extent been tested in previous research, most empirical studies to date have relied upon small opportunity and/or targeted samples (e.g., university students), often employing non-validated measures of addictive social media use (Andreassen, 2015, Ryan et al., 2014). Consequently, the present study contributes to the literature in at least two important ways. First, the data are not collected from an opportunity or targeted sample. The large sample size also boosts the statistical power and increases the chance of identifying correlates of addictive social media use. Second, the study utilizes psychometrically validated instruments in which addictive use of social media in general (instead of focusing on a specific platform, i.e., Facebook) is accounted for – making it a novel and specific addition to this research field.
Section snippets
Procedure
Individuals were invited to participate anonymously in an open cross-sectional web-survey via the official websites of five nationwide Norwegian newspapers during Spring 2014. By clicking the link to the survey, participants were provided with information about the study before providing their answers. They were also informed upfront that they would receive immediate feedback on their own score concerning their social media habits after completing all the questions. The link to the survey was
Group differences
ANOVA revealed several group differences in terms of BSMAS scores (see Table 1). Scores on addictive use of social media were higher among younger compared to older age groups (F4,23527 = 426.89, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.07); women compared to men (F1,23530 = 833.51, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.03); those not in a relationship compared to those in a relationship (F1,23530 = 295.26, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.01); lower educated compared to higher educated (F5,23526 = 101.63, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.02); students compared to non-students (F1,23530 =
Discussion
The main aim of the present study was to investigate demographic, personality, and individual differences associated with addictive use of social media. Based on the number of participants, the present study represents one of the largest surveys undertaken on this topic. The findings were broadly consistent with hypotheses and previous research, with results showing that age, sex, relationship status, narcissism, as well as self-esteem contributed significantly to the explained variance (17.5%)
References (43)
- et al.
The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism
Journal of Research in Personality
(2006) - et al.
Narcissism and comparative self-enhancement strategies
Journal of Research in Personality
(2000) - et al.
Social networking addiction: An overview of preliminary findings
- et al.
Analysis of the psychological traits, Facebook usage, and Facebook addiction model of Taiwanese university students
Telematics and Informatics
(2014) - et al.
The big five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates
Personality and Individual Differences
(2015) - et al.
Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage
Computers in Human Behavior
(2011) - et al.
Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender
Computers in Human Behavior
(2015) - et al.
The relationships among Big Five personality factors, self-esteem, narcissism, and sensation-seeking to Chinese University students´ uses of social networking sites (SNSs)
Computers in Human Behavior
(2012) - et al.
Exploring personality characteristics of Chinese adolescents with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction
Addictive Behaviors
(2015) - et al.
Debates on the narcissism conundrum. Trait, domain, dimension, type or disorder
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
(2012)
Social media use and social connectedness in adolescents: The positives and the potential pitfalls
The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review
Current Addiction Reports
Social network site addiction – An overview
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Development of a Facebook addiction scale
Psychological Reports
The relationship between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Predictors of use of social network sites at work – A specific type of cyberloafing
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Cognitive therapy. Basics and beyond
Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
A new addiction for teacher candidates: Social networks
The Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology
Cited by (665)
Fear of missing out and problematic social media use: A serial mediation model of social comparison and self-esteem
2024, Addictive Behaviors ReportsSocial anxiety and problematic social media use: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Addictive BehaviorsThe relationship of sexual objectification with internet addiction and its implications for mental health
2024, Computers in Human BehaviorThe influence of Facebook intensity on life satisfaction and academic performance of college students during COVID-19 pandemic
2024, Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsAssociation between problematic social networking site use and social well-being among young adults: A systematic review
2024, Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
- ☆
Conflict of interest: The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.