Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 39, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 1701-1705
Addictive Behaviors

Short Communication
A latent growth curve analysis of alcohol-use specific parenting and adolescent alcohol use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigates how changes in alcohol use-specific parenting were associated with adolescent drinking trajectories. Three waves of data from a longitudinal study investigating adolescent substance use were used. The community sample (N = 378) was aged 10–13 at the first wave of assessment. Our findings show that over time, parents are less likely to discipline their adolescents' drinking, more likely to grant their adolescent permission to drink, and less likely to communicate the consequences of alcohol use. Moreover, these changes are associated with escalation in adolescent alcohol use. Parental efficacy at preventing alcohol use declined, but did not relate to changes in adolescent drinking.

Introduction

Although general parenting practices (e.g., low warmth/responsiveness, inconsistent discipline) are well-established correlates of adolescent alcohol use and are prominent in socialization theories of adolescent alcohol use (Barnes et al., 2000, Chassin et al., 2002, Hawkins et al., 1992), much less research has examined alcohol use-specific parenting. Alcohol-use specific parenting refers to practices specifically aimed at deterring children's drinking, such as directly telling a child not to drink alcohol (Foley et al., 2004, Yu, 2003). There is evidence suggesting that negative parental attitudes about drinking as reflected in disapproval of alcohol, rules that prohibit drinking in the home, and perceived consequences for getting caught drinking are associated with decreased risk for adolescent alcohol use (Foley et al., 2004, Kelly et al., 2011, Martino et al., 2009, Yu, 2003). Additionally, there is evidence that low levels of adolescent-perceived parental legitimacy to regulate adolescents' alcohol use predict drinking onset (Handley & Chassin, 2013). Although parental efficacy in preventing substance use and communication of the health risks have been linked to lower risk for cigarette use (Chassin et al., 1998, Henriksen and Jackson, 1998, Jackson and Henriksen, 1997, Kodl and Mermelstein, 2004), to our knowledge, these aspects of parenting have not been examined with respect to adolescent drinking.

An important limitation of the literature is that studies have rarely examined how alcohol specific parenting might change as adolescents get older using a longitudinal design. There is evidence that parents become more permissive regarding adolescent alcohol use as youth age. For example, Kelly et al. (2011) found that parental disapproval of alcohol declined across time and that more rapid declines predicted adolescent alcohol use. Additionally, Prins, Donovan, and Molina (2011) found parents to become more accepting of sipping alcohol as their children matured into adolescence. An increase in parental permissiveness suggests that alcohol use-specific parenting might change with age, and that these changes might be associated with increases in adolescent alcohol use. The goal of this study was to test developmental changes in alcohol-specific parenting using a longitudinal design and examine if these changes were associated with trajectories of alcohol use.

Four domains of alcohol-specific parenting were considered, including parental disciplining of adolescents' drinking, parental efficacy about preventing adolescent drinking, drinking with parental permission (reflecting parental attitudes about alcohol), and parental communication of alcohol-related consequences. We hypothesized that parents would become less likely to discipline adolescents' drinking and less likely to communicate the health risk of drinking as youth age, and that these declines would be associated with increases in alcohol use. We also hypothesized that increases in drinking with parental permission across time, and that more rapid increases in drinking with parental permission would be associated with increases in alcohol use. Finally, we hypothesized declines in perceived parental efficacy in preventing adolescent drinking, and that these declines would be associated with increases in alcohol use. This hypothesis was based on the premise that as adolescents mature, they spend increasingly more time with peers, engage in more unsupervised activities, disclose less to their parents, and establish independence (Larson & Richards, 1991). This general developmental shift toward independence was hypothesized to translate into a reduction in parental efficacy.

Section snippets

Participants

The community sample of 378 families from Erie County, NY was recruited via Random Digit Dialing and Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing. Inclusion criteria included an adolescent between the ages of 11 and 12 and one caregiver willing to participate. Youth were excluded if they had mental disabilities (e.g., mental retardation, autism) or language barriers (did not speak English) that would preclude their ability to complete the measures. Given that some adolescents had a birthday between

Factor analyses of parenting measures

First, we used parallel analysis and principal components analysis at each wave of assessment to determine the number of factors for each domain of alcohol specific parenting. This yielded similar solutions across each wave, including two factors for parental reactions to adolescent alcohol use, two factors for parental efficacy, and one factor for communication of risk of drinking.

After completing exploratory factor analysis at each wave of assessment, confirmatory factor analysis was used to

Discussion

The purpose of the current study was to examine developmental changes in four domains of alcohol-specific parenting and their relation to trajectories of adolescent alcohol use. Results showed that as adolescents aged, parents became less restrictive in their alcohol-specific parenting. These findings parallel the trend of general parenting where parents monitor their adolescents' activities to a lesser extent and grant their adolescents greater levels of autonomy over time (Bumpus et al., 2001

Role of funding source

This research was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01 DA020171 awarded to Dr. Craig R. Colder. NIDA did not contribute to study design, data collection, data analysis or interpretation, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

Author A conducted literature searches, conducted statistical analyses, co-wrote the manuscript, and developed the manuscript's tables. Author B designed the study, wrote the protocol, assisted in conducting statistical analyses, and co-wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest by any author.

References (25)

  • C.R. Colder et al.

    Trajectories of reinforcement sensitivity during adolescence and risk for substance use

    Journal of Research on Adolescence

    (2012)
  • D.S. Elliott et al.

    Social class and delinquent behavior in a national youth panel

    Criminology: an Interdisciplinary Journal

    (1983)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Age trends in alcohol use behavior patterns among U.S. adults ages 18–65

      2019, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      These studies, however, have focused on a single age period or collapsed age into a small number of groups. Existing studies on alcohol use age trends have focused on single behaviors across many ages, using methods such as growth curve modeling (e.g., Zehe and Colder, 2014) and growth mixture modeling (e.g., Capaldi et al., 2013). These approaches provide a parsimonious summary of change as a parametric (e.g., linear, quadratic) function of time.

    • A parent-oriented alcohol prevention program “Effekt” had no impact on adolescents’ alcohol use: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Estonia

      2019, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another reason could be having parents as the main target group, as combining student- and parent-oriented programs have shown more promising results (Newton et al., 2017; Van Ryzin et al., 2016). To predict future behavior, attitudes have to be stable over time (Glasman and Albarracin, 2006), nevertheless it has been shown that when adolescents mature, parents become more lenient towards adolescents’ alcohol use (Glatz et al., 2012; Kelly et al., 2011; Özdemir and Koutakis, 2016; Prins et al., 2011; Zehe and Colder, 2014). However, the results from the current trial show that parents in the control group did not become more lenient over time, but compared to the intervention group still had a significantly lower prevalence of restrictive attitudes.

    • Early alcohol use with parental permission: Psychosocial characteristics and drinking in late adolescence

      2018, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Parents self-reported parental monitoring (α = 0.74) and control (α = 0.64) (Kerr & Stattin, 2000). Parents self-reported alcohol-specific parenting practices using 22 items used to create three scales (Zehe & Colder, 2014): punishment for alcohol use (5 items, i.e., “Take away privileges, like watching TV, driving etc.”, α = 0.80), negative emotional response to adolescent drinking (7 items, i.e., “Be angry with him/her”, α = 0.81) and talk about alcohol use (3 items, “Talk with him/her about why he/she did drink”, α = 0.77). The talk about alcohol use variable was skewed and was dichotomized for analyses: low (7% of the sample) and high (93% of the sample).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text