Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 36, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 1357-1360
Addictive Behaviors

Short Communication
Parent–teen communication and pre-college alcohol involvement: A latent class analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.044Get rights and content

Abstract

Although parent–adolescent communication has been identified as important in delaying the onset and escalation of alcohol use, both the strength and direction of observed associations have varied in prior research with adolescents and college students. The current study categorizes parents according to alcohol-related communication and relates these categories to other parenting factors and late adolescent alcohol involvement.

Method

As part of a larger study, 1007 college-bound teens and their parents were assessed. Teens were asked to report on their drinking behavior, and parents were asked about the occurrence of several specific alcohol-related communications with their teen, as well as additional parenting characteristics. Profiles of parent alcohol-related communication were derived using latent class analysis. Once the best fitting solution was determined, covariates were entered predicting class membership and investigating how classes were associated with additional parenting characteristics and teen alcohol use.

Results

A five-class solution provided the best fit to the data: Frequent, All Topics (28%); Moderate, All Topics (25%); Frequent, General Topics (25%); Frequent, Consequences and Limits (12%); and Infrequent, All Topics (10%). Covariate analyses demonstrated class differences with regard to parental modeling, monitoring, knowledge, and parent–teen relationship satisfaction, as well as for students' intentions to join fraternities/sororities and alcohol use.

Conclusions

Findings from the current study add to a small but growing literature supporting the continuing influence of parents in late adolescence and suggest that the frequency and specificity of parent–teen communication are potentially informative for refined parent-based preventive interventions.

Highlights

► Performed latent class analysis on 1,007 college-bound teens and their parents. ► Identified five distinct patterns of alcohol-related parent-teen communication. ► 90% of parents discussed all topics with at least moderate frequency. ► Parents who frequently discussed all topics tended to model alcohol use the least. ► Profiles also differed on monitoring, relationship satisfaction, and teen drinking.

Introduction

Familial factors have been ubiquitous in attempts to understand adolescent development and inform effective intervention (Masten & Shaffer, 2006). Parental monitoring, knowledge, permissiveness for drinking, and disapproval of drinking have demonstrated associations with alcohol use and consequences in both cross-sectional (e.g., Chen et al., 2008, Sessa, 2005) and prospective (e.g., Abar and Turrisi, 2008, Walls et al., 2009, White et al., 2006) research. Although parent–adolescent communication is also thought to be protective against drinking, both the strength and direction of associations have varied in both younger (Ennett et al., 2001, van der Vorst et al., 2005) and older (Turrisi et al., 2000, Turrisi et al., 2007) adolescents. Given the null or modest effects to date for parent-based alcohol interventions with college students emphasizing communication (Ichiyama et al., 2009, Turrisi et al., 2009, Turrisi et al., 2001, Wood et al., 2010), refined knowledge of specific aspects of alcohol-related communication could inform intervention revision.

Accordingly, this study applied a person-centered approach, latent class analysis (LCA), to the examination of specific communication patterns of parents and their college matriculating teens. We asked: 1) What patterns of alcohol-related communication are reported by parents of pre-college students? 2) How might these patterns be associated with other relevant parenting characteristics (e.g., parental monitoring)? 3) How might these communication patterns be differentially associated with late adolescent alcohol use and intended selection into the fraternity/sorority (“Greek”) system, which is consistently predictive of alcohol-related problems in college (McCabe et al., 2005, Park et al., 2009)?

Section snippets

Participants

A sample of 1007 incoming student–parent dyads at a large northeastern university was recruited as part of a larger randomized control trial aimed at reducing alcohol-related harm in college (Wood et al., 2010). Eligible participants were incoming students between 17 and 21 years of age, with parental consent for those under 18. Students received $30 and parents received $40 for participation. The average age was 18.4 years (SD = .41), 57% was female, 89% was White/Caucasian, and approximately 84%

Preliminary analysis

Results revealed at least 90% of the parents endorsed either a moderate amount or a great deal of discussion on items 1–7 listed in Table 1.

Latent class analysis

A five-class solution fit the data best, as indicated by the lowest BIC and a significant aLRT. The first class (28% of the population) was labeled the Frequent, All Topics class (see Table 1). Parents in this class were the most likely to endorse a great deal of communication on each of the nine indicators. The second class (25%) was labeled the Moderate,

Discussion

Extending previous variable-centered data analytic approaches, this study is, to our knowledge, the first application of LCA to parent reports of alcohol-related communication. In general, it appears that the majority of parents in this sample report a moderate to high amount of communication with their teens regarding college alcohol use, with specific attention on potential dangers and the importance of avoiding peer pressure. These findings are encouraging for the involvement of parents in

Conclusions

In spite of these limitations, findings from the current study support the continuing influence of parents in late adolescence and imply that the frequency, specificity, and quality (see Otten, Harakeh, Vermulst, Van den Eijnden, & Engels, 2007) of parent–teen communication are informative for parent-based preventive interventions. As recognized in the earlier adolescent literature (Ennett et al., 2001), multi-dimensional assessment of communication, as well as the incorporation of elements of

Role of funding sources

Funding for this study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) to C. Abar (F31 AA018063-01) and M. Wood (R01 AA013919). NIAAA had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Contributors

Author Wood designed the study and wrote the protocol. Author Fernandez assisted in data collection and study organization. Author Abar conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing and refining the paper and have approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors are connected in any way to the alcohol, tobacco, pharmaceutical, or gaming industry. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism to C. Abar (F31 AA018063-01) and M. Wood (R01 AA013919).

References (25)

  • C. Abar et al.

    How important are parents during the college years? A longitudinal perspective of indirect influences parents yield on their college teens' alcohol use

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2008)
  • M. Chen et al.

    Identifying social mechanisms for the prevention of adolescent drinking and driving

    Accident Analysis and Prevention

    (2008)
  • D. Baumrind

    Authoritarian v. authoritative parental control

    Adolescence

    (1968)
  • R.L. Collins et al.

    Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1985)
  • N. Darling et al.

    Parenting style as context: An integrative model

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1993)
  • S.T. Ennett et al.

    Parent–child communication about adolescent tobacco and alcohol use: What do parents say and how does it affect youth behavior

    Journal of Marriage and the Family

    (2001)
  • M.A. Ichiyama et al.

    A randomized trial of a parent-based intervention on drinking behaviors among incoming college freshmen

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement

    (2009)
  • Y. Lo et al.

    Testing the number of components in a normal mixture

    Biometrika

    (2001)
  • A.S. Masten et al.

    How families matter in child development: Reflections from research on risk and resilience. (pp. 5–25)

  • S.E. McCabe et al.

    Selection and socialization effects of fraternities and sororities on US college student substance use:A multi-cohort national longitudinal study

    Addiction

    (2005)
  • L.K. Muthen et al.

    Mplus User's Guide

    (1998–2007)
  • R. Otten et al.

    Frequency and quality of parental communication as antecedents of adolescence smoking cognitions and smoking onset

    Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

    (2007)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Parent-adolescent relationships in Hispanic versus Caucasian families: Associations with alcohol and marijuana use onset

      2017, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      The protective effects of positive PAR persist into adulthood, as evidence suggests positive PAR prospectively predicts less problematic alcohol use (Ryan et al., 2010), and less use of tobacco, marijuana, and other illicit substances later in life (Branstetter, Low, & Furman, 2011; Ledoux, Miller, Choquet, & Plant, 2002). Conversely, negative dimensions of PAR have been shown to lower age of alcohol and marijuana onset (e.g., Abar, Fernandez, & Wood, 2011), as well as predict more problematic use later in life (Kamon, Budney, & Stanger, 2005; Kamon et al., 2006; Stanger, Budney, Kamon, & Thostensen, 2009). Negative dimensions of PAR may disrupt family cohesiveness, important values of positive authority, and overall support, all of which serve as protective factors for adolescent substance use (Schwarz et al., 2012; Schwarz et al., 2005).

    • Parental monitoring and family relations: Associations with drinking patterns among male and female Mexican students

      2015, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Family relations refers to family connectedness and functioning including familial bonding, cohesion, support, communication and conflict (Dillon, Pantin, Robbins, et al., 2008; Stone et al., 2012). Studies in many countries show decreased alcohol use among adolescents and young adults associated with either higher levels of parental monitoring (Abar, Fernandez, & Wood, 2011; Arria, Kuhn, Caldeira, et al., 2008; Boyd-Ball, Dishion, Myers, et al., 2011; Clark, Nguyen, Belgrave, et al., 2011; Ledoux, Miller, Choquet, et al., 2002; Moore, Rothwell, & Segrott, 2010; Nagoshi, Marsiglia, Parsai, et al., 2011; Ryan et al., 2010; Strunin, Díaz Martínez, Díaz-Martínez, et al., 2013; Tobler & Komro, 2010; Walls, Fairlie, & Wood, 2009; Yabiku, Marsiglia, Kulis, et al., 2010) or good family relations (Cable & Sacker, 2008; Clark et al., 2011; Kopak, Chen, Haas, et al., 2012; Kuendig & Kuntsche, 2006; Ledoux et al., 2002; Moore et al., 2010; Nash, McQueen, & Bray, 2005; Ryan et al., 2010; Stone et al., 2012; Strunin, A. Díaz-Martínez, L.R. Díaz-Martínez, et al., 2015). A few studies also show higher levels of parental monitoring or stronger family relations protective for alcohol-related consequences among young people (Jackson, Denny, Sheridan, et al., 2014; Varvil-Weld, Mallett, Turrisi, et al., 2013; Walls et al., 2009).

    • Alcohol abstinence or harm-reduction? Parental messages for college-bound light drinkers

      2015, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      A new variable, Primary Message Type, was created to indicate whether participants more frequently received alcohol abstinence (n = 84) or safe-drinking (n = 84) messages from their parents. The dichotomous Primary Message Type variable was found ideal for analysis as it was not confounded by overall frequency of parental alcohol communication, which has been associated with student alcohol use cross-sectionally among proactive parents aware of their students increased alcohol use (Abar, Fernandez, & Wood, 2011). Frequency of parental alcohol communication is measured separately for statistical control purposes.

    • A randomized trial evaluating a parent based intervention to reduce college drinking

      2013, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, research indicates that adolescent and college student alcohol use are inversely associated with parental monitoring (Abar & Turrisi, 2008; Turrisi & Ray, 2010; van der Vorst, Engels, Meeus, Devoki, & Vermulst, 2006, Wood, Read, Mitchell, & Brand, 2004). Additionally, parental attitudes toward drinking (Abar, Abar, & Turrisi, 2009; Turrisi, Jaccard, Taki, Dunnam, & Grimes, 2001; Wood et al., 2004) and parent–child communication (Abar, Fernandez, & Wood, 2011; Abar, Morgan, Small, & Maggs, 2012; Turrisi, Padella, et al., 2000) are related to college student drinking. Taken together, these studies indicate that parents do continue to exert an influence on their children's alcohol use through adolescence and young adulthood and that interventions provided to parents may be useful in reducing drinking in first year college students.

    • Parental monitoring and alcohol use among Mexican students

      2013, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      The parental monitoring construct encompasses a varied set of activities throughout a child's development (Dishion & McMahon, 1998). Studies exploring the associations between parental monitoring and alcohol-related factors illustrate the importance of parent–teen communication and the varying strategies that parents use to understand the habits and substance use behaviors of their teen and their teen's friends (Abar, Fernandez, & Wood, 2011; Bahr, Hoffmann, & Yang, 2005; Bourdeau et al., 2011; Clark et al., 2011; Kopak, Chen, Haas, & Gillmore, 2012; Moore et al., 2010). To our knowledge no studies have focused on this relationship among Mexican youths.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text