Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 36, Issue 4, April 2011, Pages 427-430
Addictive Behaviors

Short Communication
Alexithymia, craving and attachment in a heavy drinking population

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.12.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Up to fifty per cent of individuals with Alcohol use disorders (AUD) also have alexithymia a personality construct hypothesized to be related to attachment difficulties. The relationship between alexithymia, craving, anxious attachment and alcohol-dependence severity was examined in 254 patients participating in a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program for alcohol-dependence. Participants completed the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS), the Revised Adult Attachment Anxiety Subscale (RAAS-Anxiety) and the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). MANOVA indicated that individuals with alexithymia reported significantly higher levels of total OCDS, obsessive thoughts about alcohol, and compulsive drinking urges and behavior, compared to the non-alexithymic group. Regression analyses found that anxious attachment partially mediated the relationship between alexithymia and craving. Anxious attachment may be a potential treatment target to reduce alcohol consumption in those with alcohol-dependence and alexithymia.

Research Highlights

► There were significant relationships of alexithymia, craving and anxious attachment. ► Alexithymic alcoholics reported higher levels of craving and alcoholism severity. ► Anxious attachment partially mediated the relationship of alexithymia and craving.

Section snippets

Participants

Two hundred and fifty four patients (176 males and 78 females) were recruited from a hospital outpatient Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (CBT) program for alcohol-dependence. Male and female participant mean ages were 36.84 years (SD = 11.34) and 39.03 years (SD = 9.25), respectively. The study inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of alcohol-dependence in accordance to DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000) criteria. All were evaluated before pharmacotherapy (including anti-craving medication) was introduced.

Intercorrelations

Relationships among the TAS-20 scales, OCDS scales, RAAS-Anxiety and AUDIT scale were examined by means of Pearson correlation coefficients across all participants (see Table 1).

Group comparisons

Based on established TAS-20 classification criteria, 32.4% of the sample was categorized as alexithymic and 42.3% as non-alexithymic. A two-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted with the independent variables of group (alexithymic, non-alexithymic), and gender and the dependent variables OCDS,

Discussion

Our results highlight the importance of alexithymia and difficulties identifying and describing feelings as related to preoccupation, obsessions and compulsive behaviors regarding drinking in those with alcohol-dependence. In this study 32.4% of this alcohol-dependent group was classified as alexithymic and 42.3% as non-alexithymic. This is less than previously reported prevalence rates of 45–67% (Thorberg et al., 2009). Furthermore, alcohol-dependence severity, alexithymia and insecure

Role of Funding Sources

None.

Contributors

None.

Conflict of Interest

None for any author.

Acknowledgments

Parts of this paper were presented at the Asian Conference of the Social Sciences in June 2010 at Osaka Japan.

References (38)

  • M. Al Birt et al.

    Alexithymia, a risk factor in alcohol addiction? A brief research report on Romanian population

    Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies

    (2008)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2000)
  • R.F. Anton et al.

    The Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale—A self-rated instrument for the quantification of thoughts about alcohol and drinking behavior

    Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research

    (1995)
  • T.F. Babor et al.

    Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care

    (2001)
  • R.M. Baron et al.

    The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • M. Bottlender et al.

    Impact of craving on alcohol relapse during, and 12 months following, outpatient treatment

    Alcohol and Alcoholism

    (2004)
  • N.L. Collins

    Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1996)
  • N.L. Collins et al.

    Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1990)
  • J.P. Connor et al.

    Validity of the obsessive compulsive drinking scale in a heavy drinking population

    Alcoholism-Clinical and Experimental Research

    (2008)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Early parent-child interactions and substance use disorder: An attachment perspective on a biopsychosocial entanglement

      2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      In fact, this would open the debate of whether this association is a pure comorbidity, a merely diagnostic comorbidity, related to item overlap, or an aethiopathogenic comorbidity, in which the relationship between internalising symptoms and SUD is causal (Feinstein, 1970). Independently from which is the true meaning of this association, literature seems to agree that internalising symptoms increase the risk of substance use beyond a maladaptive attachment in healthy subjects (Niyonsenga et al., 2012; Pellerone et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2017; Shin et al., 2011; Meredith et al., 2020; Greger et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2020) and clinical populations (De Palo et al., 2014; Miljkovitch et al., 2005; Musetti et al., 2016; Schindler et al., 2007; Vismara et al., 2019; Wedekind et al., 2013; Thorberg et al., 2011; De Rick et al., 2009; Fowler et al., 2013; Owens et al., 2014), also longitudinally (Gidhagen et al., 2018). Considering familial moderators, several cross-sectional studies in healthy subjects showed that a problematic family environment (Cleveland et al., 2014; De Wit et al., 1999; Hayre et al., 2019; Kanamori et al., 2016; Kostelecky, 2005; Luk et al., 2015; Scragg et al., 2008 Zdankiewicz-Ścigała and Ścigała, 2020; Winham et al., 2015; Vungkhanching et al., 2004; Massey et al., 2014;

    • The associations between alexithymia and both non-suicidal self-injury and risky drinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lyvers et al. (2014b) did not report this association. Kopera et al. (2018), Lyvers et al. (2014b), Thorberg et al. (2010, 2011a), utilised all three subscales of the TAS-20 and reported a significant positive relationship between DIF and risky drinking. However, results for DDF and EOT were mixed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text