Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 30, Issue 5, June 2005, Pages 1043-1048
Addictive Behaviors

Short communication
Illicit drug use and abuse/dependence: modeling of two-stage variables using the CCC approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Drug use and abuse/dependence are stages of a complex drug habit. Most genetically informative models that are fit to twin data examine drug use and abuse/dependence independent of each other. This poses an interesting question: for a multistage process, how can we partition the factors influencing each stage specifically from the factors that are common to both stages? We used a causal-common-contingent (CCC) model to partition the common and specific influences on drug use and abuse/dependence. Data on use and abuse/dependence of cannabis, cocaine, sedatives, stimulants and any illicit drug was obtained from male and female twin pairs. CCC models were tested individually for each sex and in a sex-equal model. Our results suggest that there is evidence for additive genetic, shared environmental and unique environmental influences that are common to illicit drug use and abuse/dependence. Furthermore, we found substantial evidence for factors that were specific to abuse/dependence. Finally, sexes could be equated for all illicit drugs. The findings of this study emphasize the need for models that can partition the sources of individual differences into common and stage-specific influences.

Introduction

Illicit drug use is moderately heritable (26–40% due to genetic factors or A) with evidence for the role of shared environmental (environment shared by members of a twin pair or C) and individual-specific environmental factors (E). Abuse/dependence of illicit drugs is highly heritable (28–79% due to A) with the remainder of the variance due to individual-specific environmental influences (Kendler et al., 2000, Kendler et al., 1999a, Tsuang et al., 2001, Van den Bree et al., 1998). However, drug involvement is a two-stage process where drug use (the so-called “upstream” variable), in certain cases, is followed by the clinically diagnosed stage of abuse/dependence (the “downstream” variable). This contingent nature (use must precede abuse/dependence) was not considered in previous univariate models. The causal-common-contingent (CCC) model is an improvement over the standard independent assessments of drug use and abuse/dependence (Kendler, Neale, & Sullivan et al., 1999). The model allows for partitioning of genetic and environmental factors common to drug use and abuse/dependence from the factors that are unique to abuse/dependence. Using the CCC model, in the present study we sought to examine the role of common and specific additive genetic (A), shared environmental (C) and unique environmental (E) factors on the two stages (use and abuse/dependence) of cannabis, cocaine, sedatives, stimulants and any illicit drug involvement and test for the presence of quantitative gender differences.

Section snippets

Sample

This study utilized drug use and abuse/dependence information from 1191 (702 MZ and 489 DZ pairs) male and 934 (556 MZ and 378 DZ pairs) female same-sex monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) Caucasian twin pairs from the Virginia Adult Twin Study of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders (VATSPSUD), a longitudinal study based on participants from the Virginia Twin Registry (now a part of the Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry). The most recent and complete waves of interview were used for these

Results

Mean age of the female twins was 35.8 years (range 21–62 years) at the fourth wave of interviews with a mean education level of 14.3 years. The male twin pairs had a mean age of 35.5 years (range 20–58 years) and a mean education level of 13.6 years at the second wave of interviews. Standardized parameter estimates for each illicit drug are presented in Table 1, separately for males and females. For all the illicit drugs, except sedatives, ai2 ranges between 0.48 and 0.73, ci2 ranges between

Discussion

Drug use and abuse/dependence should be modeled as a two-stage process. Previous studies have typically modeled use and abuse/dependence, individually, without considering the contingent relationship between them. Two previous studies used data from the same data set to assess use and abuse/dependence with the CCC approach. In this study, we sought to obtain the best estimates of additive genetic, shared environmental and unique environmental factors on illicit drug use and abuse/dependence

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants MH-40828, MH/AA/DA-49492, AA-09095 and DA-11287. We acknowledge the contribution of the Virginia Twin Registry, now part of the Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry (MATR), for ascertainment of subjects for this study. The MATR, directed by Dr. J Silberg, L Corey and L. Eaves, has received support from the National Institutes of Health, the Carman Trust and the WM Keck, John Templeton and Robert Wood Johnson Foundations.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (58)

  • Cannabis use in college: Genetic predispositions, peers, and activity participation

    2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
    Citation Excerpt :

    These genetic correlations suggest that some of the genetic liability indexed by our PRS is not specific to cannabis use and may reflect a more general liability for psychopathology. Additionally, the genetic etiology of substance use initiation and substance use escalation vary (Agrawal et al., 2005), suggesting that additional information may be gained by examining PRS for cannabis consumption and cannabis use disorder. In summary, social contexts and their interactions with genetic risks were important predictors of recent cannabis use.

  • Neuroepigenetics and addiction

    2018, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
  • Genetic variation in FAAH is associated with cannabis use disorders in a young adult sample of Mexican Americans

    2016, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
    Citation Excerpt :

    Due to the modest sample size, which could lead to false negatives, subjects who had never used cannabis were included. There are two reasons why this likely does not mitigate the results of this study: (1) a recent meta-analysis suggested that environmental influences play a larger role in cannabis initiation than CUD (Verweij et al., 2010), and (2) there may be some overlap in genetic influences between cannabis initiation and CUD (Agrawal et al., 2005; Fowler et al., 2007; Gillespie et al., 2009). Finally, as with other human genetic studies, replication is needed to support our findings.

  • Two-part random effects growth modeling to identify risks associated with alcohol and cannabis initiation, initial average use and changes in drug consumption in a sample of adult, male twins

    2012, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
    Citation Excerpt :

    With respect to etiology, it is possible that drug-specific covariates risks account for some of the unshared variance between alcohol and cannabis use, or for aspects of the genetic and environmental influences known to be uncorrelated across drug use phenotypes (Kendler et al., 2007b, 2003b). Likewise, any risks that predict initiation but not average use may account for the proportion of genetic and environmental liability in drug initiation that does not overlap with measures of chronic use and abuse (Agrawal and Lynskey, 2006; Agrawal et al., 2005; Gillespie et al., 2009b). An assumption implicit in many previous reports (Boyle et al., 1992; Dishion and Loeber, 1985a; Fergusson and Lynskey, 1998; Freisthler et al., 2005; Helzer et al., 1992; Kandel et al., 1978; Kendler et al., 1997; Lynskey and Hall, 2001; McDermott, 1984; McGue et al., 1999; Szobot and Bukstein, 2008; Werner, 1982; Werner and Smith, 1989; Young et al., 1995) is that the etiology of risks is entirely environmental and antecedent to drug use.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text