Elsevier

Academic Pediatrics

Volume 11, Issue 2, March–April 2011, Pages 136-143.e8
Academic Pediatrics

New Research on Children With Special Health Care Needs
Evidence for Family-Centered Care for Children With Special Health Care Needs: A Systematic Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Family-centered care (FCC) has received widespread endorsement for use in care in the United States. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of evidence for FCC focusing specifically on family-provider partnership as the activity that constitutes FCC.

Methods

We found and reviewed articles from the medical, nursing, psychology, and sociology literature spanning 1986 to 2010. We also reviewed articles obtained through related references and through recommendations from key informants. Four sets of terms were used to search, including FCC, child/adolescent, children with special health care needs (CSHCN, defined broadly or by condition), and a relevant outcome.

Results

Twenty-four studies met the review criteria. Eight were cross-sectional studies from the National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs, and 7 were reports of randomized, controlled trials. Of the 24 articles reviewed, 13 examined populations of CSHCN or similar populations, 6 examined children with asthma, and the remaining studied children with other specific conditions. We found positive associations of FCC with improvements in efficient use of services, health status, satisfaction, access to care, communication, systems of care, family functioning, and family impact/cost. There was little available evidence, however, for some outcomes, including cost and transition.

Conclusions

The available evidence suggests that FCC is associated with improved outcomes for CSHCN. With positive findings for most of the studies reviewed here and the compelling arguments for FCC, we recommend the use of this approach by individuals and organizations.

Section snippets

Organization of Review

Definitions of FCC include a variety of specific activities. We used FCC-related statements by the MCHB3, 4 and AAP,5 input of the project advisory committee (comprising CSHCN researchers, family members, and health care providers), and input from reviewers to identify the “family-provider partnership” as our functional definition of FCC for this review. This decision parallels the operationalization of FCC in the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NSCSHCN). To be

Results

The initial searches yielded 4886 articles that met the search criteria and had abstracts, 2828 of which were based in the United States. From this list, 2 authors reviewed all titles and/or abstracts. They then identified 98 articles to review in full. We included 24 in this review. These articles met the search criteria and the quality score criterion. Seven of the articles were based on randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), 11 were based on cross-sectional associations with no intervention,

Discussion

This review found evidence that FCC is associated with improved outcomes in several domains. We found these associations among different populations of CSHCN, operationalizations of FCC, and outcomes. We did not find evidence that FCC was associated with poorer outcomes. For most studies, there was at least one association of FCC with a positive outcome. Most studies measured several outcomes, and some studies had mixed findings, with only a few having only nonsignificant or negative findings.

Acknowledgment

We thank our funders at the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, cooperative agreement 5 U53MC04473-03-00, members of our advisory group, and Jill Hurson.

References (39)

  • Institute for Family-Centered Care. Advancing the Practice of patient- and family-centered ambulatory care: how to get...
  • J.M. Perrin et al.

    A family-centered, community based system of services for children and youth with special health care needs

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2007)
  • S.H. Downs et al.

    The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomized and non-randomized studies of health care interventions

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1998)
  • R.E. Stein et al.

    Long-term mental health effects of a pediatric home care program

    Pediatrics

    (1991)
  • S. Guendelman et al.

    Improving asthma outcomes and self-management behaviors of inner-city children: a randomized trial of the Health Buddy interactive device and an asthma diary

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2002)
  • S.L. Wade et al.

    Putting the pieces together: preliminary efficacy of a family problem-solving intervention for children with traumatic brain injury

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (2006)
  • M.L. Wolraich et al.

    Intervening to improve communication between parents, teachers, and primary care providers of children with ADHD or at high risk for ADHD

    J Attend Disord

    (2005)
  • J.S. Palfrey et al.

    The Pediatric Alliance for Coordinated Care: evaluation of a medical home model

    Pediatrics

    (2004)
  • J.E. Farmer et al.

    Comprehensive primary care for children with special health care needs in rural areas

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • Cited by (228)

    • Children and youth with special healthcare needs

      2023, Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health, First Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text