Elsevier

Academic Pediatrics

Volume 9, Issue 1, January–February 2009, Pages 33-39
Academic Pediatrics

Emergency Department Use
Primary Care Quality and Subsequent Emergency Department Utilization for Children in Wisconsin Medicaid

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2008.11.004Get rights and content

Objective

Children enrolled in Medicaid have disproportionately high emergency department (ED) visit rates. Despite the growing importance of patient reported quality-of-care assessments, little is known about the association between parent-reported quality of primary care and ED utilization for these high-risk children. Our goal was to determine the association between parent-reported primary care quality and subsequent ED utilization for children in Medicaid.

Methods

We studied a retrospective cohort of children enrolled in Wisconsin Medicaid. Parents of children sampled during fall 2002 and fall 2004 completed Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys assessing their child's primary care quality in 3 domains: family centeredness, timeliness, and realized access. Primary outcomes were the rates of subsequent nonurgent and urgent ED visits, extracted from claims data for the year after survey completion. Negative binomial regression was used to determine the association between the domains of care and ED utilization.

Results

A total of 5468 children were included. High-quality family centeredness was associated with a 27% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 11%–40%) lower nonurgent ED visit rate, but no lowering of the urgent visit rate. High-quality timeliness was associated with 18% (95% CI, 3%–31%) lower nonurgent and 18% (95% CI, 1%–33%) lower urgent visit rates. High-quality realized access was associated with a 27% (95% CI, 8%–43%) lower nonurgent visit rate and a 33% (95% CI, 14%–48%) lower urgent visit rate.

Conclusions

Parent-reported high-quality timeliness, family centeredness, and realized access for a publicly insured child are associated with lower nonurgent ED, with high-quality timeliness and realized access associated with lower urgent ED utilization.

Section snippets

Study Population and Source of Data

This is a retrospective cohort analysis linking the results of cross-sectional CAHPS surveys evaluating quality of primary care to subsequent ED utilization as determined by analysis of administrative Medicaid data.

The study population combines 2 cohorts of children, one cohort from 2002 and the other from 2004. In the fall of 2002 and again in the fall of 2004, the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services sent CAHPS surveys to randomly selected enrollees in the Wisconsin Managed Care

Results

A total of 5582 children had completed CAHPS surveys, of which 114 were excluded for incomplete subsequent enrollment. The final cohort of children was very similar in age and gender to the population of all children enrolled in the Managed Care Medicaid program as determined by comparison to enrollment data from the Department of Health and Family Services. Of the 5468 children in the final cohort, 1540 children (28.2%) made a total of 2792 ED visits during the follow-up year, yielding an

Discussion

The study findings indicate that specific domains that comprise high parent-reported quality of primary care for children are associated with lower subsequent nonurgent and urgent visit rates to the ED. High-quality family centeredness, timeliness, and realized access were all associated with lower subsequent nonurgent utilization of the ED for children, while high-quality timeliness and realized access were also associated with a lower subsequent urgent visit rate to the ED.

The findings from

Conclusions

Parent-reported high-quality timeliness, family centeredness, and realized access of primary care for a child are associated with significantly lower rates of subsequent nonurgent ED visits while high-quality realized access and timeliness are also associated with lower rates of urgent ED visits. Whether the ED visits are parent reported or are based on administrative data, the relationship between these domains of care and subsequent utilization is similar, thus strengthening the argument that

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant (K08 HS015482-01A1) to Dr Brousseau from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors report no conflicts of interest or corporate sponsors.

References (39)

  • D.C. Brousseau et al.

    Quality of primary care and subsequent pediatric emergency department utilization

    Pediatrics

    (2007)
  • National Center for Health Statistics

    Health, United States, 2005 With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans

    (2005)
  • D.W. Baker et al.

    Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physician. Causes and consequences

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • N.S. Fleming et al.

    The impact of outpatient department and emergency room use on costs in the Texas Medicaid Program

    Med Care

    (1983)
  • J.A. Coventry et al.

    Emergency room encounters of pediatric patients with asthma: cost comparisons with other treatment settings

    J Ambul Care Manage

    (1996)
  • B.C. Martin

    Emergency medicine versus primary care: a case study of three prevalent, costly, and non-emergent diagnoses at a community teaching hospital

    J Health Care Finance

    (2000)
  • D.A. Christakis et al.

    Association of lower continuity of care with greater risk of emergency department use and hospitalization in children

    Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • A.K. Jha

    Measuring hospital quality: what physicians do? How patients fare? Or both?

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • L. Rodewald et al.

    Immunization performance measurement in a changing immunization environment

    Pediatrics

    (1999)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Respiratory Virus Surveillance in Infants across Different Clinical Settings

      2021, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      We speculate that the discrepancy between these results may be explained by the fact that our rounded approach, combining virologic, patient, and health-system information, enabled more complete adjustment for potential confounding variables in our study, as well as by differences in study cohorts (ie, age groups and indications for ED visits). On the other hand, Brousseau et al evaluated ED visits among Medicaid insured children in Wisconsin.28 Among 5468 children included, 59% of ED visits were classified as nonurgent, and children less than 2 years of age, not having a primary health care provider, having a lower parental education levels, and lower parent-reported quality of care in the OP setting were associated with higher adjusted incidence rate ratios of nonurgent ED visits.

    • Care coordination for children with sickle cell disease: A longitudinal study of parent perspectives and acute care utilization

      2016, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some encounters may be preventable, others may not be, especially those occurring at off hours. Prior studies have shown limited associations between components of the medical home and acute care utilization.30–32 Second, it is possible that the definition of CC in the NSCH may not be applicable across all populations of children.

    • Emergency hospital admissions for initial febrile urinary tract infection: Do patient demographics matter?

      2015, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In light of these latter studies, caution must be exercised when inferring from the meta-analysis data used in the AAP UTI imaging guideline that there is limited clinical benefit to diagnosing and treating VUR in infants and young children. ED utilization is higher among Medicaid patients, and we likewise saw a higher percentage of Medicaid patients in the ED setting compared to our outpatient pediatric urology clinic population (8,9,18). Furthermore, children presenting in the ED setting may be more ill, more likely to require hospitalization, and more likely to have an underlying anatomic abnormality.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text