Series
Causes, diagnosis, and treatment of central precocious puberty

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00380-0Get rights and content

Summary

Central precocious puberty results from the premature activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. It mimics physiological pubertal development, although at an inappropriate chronological age (before 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys). It can be attributable to cerebral congenital malformations or acquired insults, but the cause in most cases in girls remains unknown. MKRN3 gene defects have been identified in familial disease, with important basic and clinical results. Indeed, genetic analysis of this gene should be included in the routine clinical investigation of familial and idiopathic cases of central precocious puberty. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are the gold-standard treatment. The assessment and management of this disease remain challenging for paediatric endocrinologists. In this Series paper, we describe current challenges involving the precise diagnosis and adequate treatment of this disorder.

Introduction

Puberty represents a complex biological process of sexual development that can be affected by genetic, nutritional, environmental, and socioeconomic factors. During this phase of development, individuals attain secondary sexual characteristics and reproductive capacity. In girls, the onset of puberty is defined clinically as the first appearance of breast buds, whereas in boys, testicular enlargement is the first pubertal sign.1 In both sexes, pubic hair appearance can begin before, together with, or after the clinical onset of puberty.1

The normal age range for puberty onset refers to the time in which 95% of children attain initial pubertal signs (Tanner and Marshall stage 2 in both sexes).2, 3 In the 1960s, cross-sectional data led to designation of the normal age range of pubertal onset between ages 8 and 13 years in girls and between ages 9 and 14 years in boys. In the past two decades, cross-sectional data from the USA and Europe suggests that pubertal milestones are being reached earlier than previously thought in both sexes.4, 5, 6, 7 The putative decrease in age at the start of puberty has largely been attributed to improved health, nutrition, and sanitation.8

These findings guided recommendations to classify pubertal development as precocious when it occurs before age 6 years in black girls and before age 7 years in all other girls.4 However, the validity of these initial recommendations was questioned because the Tanner staging of breast development was established mainly by inspection and not palpation.3 In 2009, Roelants and colleagues6 updated the reference charts for pubertal development in a large group of healthy Belgian children. The median age at menarche (13·0 years) had not advanced over the previous 50 years, despite the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in children older than 5 years in this period. However, about 10% of girls and boys in the study had initial pubertal development before age 9 years. In 2013, Biro and colleagues7 reported that the onset of thelarche at younger ages is associated with ethnic origin and temporal changes in BMI, confirming and extending patterns seen in previous studies.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 The lower age at thelarche in girls did not seem to be caused by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) activation—but other potential mechanisms, such as endocrine disruptors and nutritional effects, might have had a role in this process.9

The most common mechanism of precocious puberty is the early activation of pulsatile GnRH secretion, known as gonadotropin-dependent precocious puberty or central precocious puberty. The estimated incidence in American girls is 1 in 5000–10 000.10 However, the prevalence was 1 in 500 among Danish girls, based on national registries over a 9-year period (1993–2001).11 The prevalence is sexually dimorphic, being higher in girls than in boys (15–20 girls for every boy).

The timing of puberty has substantial biological, psychosocial, and long-term health implications.1, 12 Concerns are associated with the diagnosis of precocious puberty, such as early menarche in girls, short adult stature because of early epiphyseal fusion, and adverse psychosocial outcomes. Evidence suggests an association between early timing of puberty and adverse health outcomes in later life.8, 12, 13 Early age at menarche has been associated with increased risks of obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, oestrogen-dependent cancer, and cardiovascular mortality.12, 13 Additionally, early age at menarche is a known risk factor for the development of breast cancer.14, 15 This association is largely attributed to high early exposure to oestrogen during the initial stages of breast development and throughout the reproductive years. Some evidence suggests that children with precocious puberty have increased sexual and delinquent behaviours in adulthood, or more psychological disturbances over and above general trends reported in children who undergo a normal puberty.16, 17 In this Series paper, we describe the known and new causes of central precocious puberty. We focus on the clinical assessment of central precocious puberty, and outline the challenges involved in the precise diagnosis and management of this common paediatric disorder.

Section snippets

Causes

Several cerebral malformations and acquired insults have been associated with central precocious puberty (panel). The range of causes is similar in boys and girls, although idiopathic disease is much more common in girls—about 90% of cases in girls are idiopathic.18, 19 By contrast, 50–70% of the boys have identifiable pathological changes. The most frequently detected brain abnormalities associated with the disorder include hypothalamic hamartomas, encephalitis, hydrocephalus,

Clinical assessment

The first step in assessing a child with precocious puberty is to obtain a detailed personal and family history.18, 31 The age of onset and the time velocity of physical changes, development of secondary sexual characteristics, sex steroid exposure, and evidence of possible CNS dysfunction (such as headache, large head circumference, visual abnormalities or seizures, trauma, or infections) are important information. The physical examination includes the assessment of secondary sexual

Differential diagnosis of precocious puberty

It is very important to distinguish between central precocious puberty and common variants of precocious puberty, such as premature thelarche or premature adrenarche.18, 19, 49 Premature thelarche is defined by isolated development of breast tissue, without other pubertal findings, such as accelerated linear growth, rapid progression of breast development, or advanced skeletal maturation. It often occurs in toddler girls and usually regresses over several months.66 Premature adrenarche is

GnRH agonist treatment

Long-acting GnRH agonists have been the gold-standard treatment since the mid-1980s. Questions remain about their optimum use—an international consensus statement published in 2009 summarised the available information and the areas of uncertainty.16 GnRH agonists continuously stimulate the pituitary gonadotrophs, leading to desensitisation and decreases in release of LH and, to a lesser extent, FSH.70 Several GnRH agonists are available in various depot forms, and their approval for use and

Conclusions

Despite great advances in knowledge regarding the assessment and management of central precocious puberty, several challenges remain. Among these challenges are to distinguish normal pubertal development (benign variants or non-progressive forms of sexual precocity) from pathological disorders and to recognise the underlying mechanisms involved. During the investigation, it is important to establish the appropriate time to do additional assessments in a cost-effective way.

Recent progress in the

Search strategy and selection criteria

Data for this Series paper were identified by searches of PubMed and references from relevant articles using the search terms “precocious puberty” or “central precocious puberty”. Articles in English published between Jan 1, 1995, and July 20, 2015 were included.

References (85)

  • KA Lewis et al.

    Random luteinizing hormone often remains pubertal in children treated with the histrelin implant for central precocious puberty

    J Pediatr

    (2013)
  • S Heger et al.

    Long-term GnRH agonist treatment for female central precocious puberty does not impair reproductive function

    Mol Cell Endocrinol

    (2006)
  • D Gillis et al.

    Time to menarche and final height after histrelin implant treatment for central precocious puberty

    J Pediatr

    (2013)
  • KA Lewis et al.

    A single histrelin implant is effective for 2 years for treatment of central precocious puberty

    J Pediatr

    (2013)
  • C Castaño De La Mota et al.

    Hypothalamic hamartoma in paediatric patients: clinical characteristics, outcomes and review of the literature

    Neurologia

    (2012)
  • AS Parent et al.

    The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration

    Endocr Rev

    (2003)
  • WA Marshall et al.

    Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys

    Arch Dis Child

    (1970)
  • WATJ Marshall et al.

    Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls

    Arch Dis Child

    (1969)
  • ME Herman-Giddens et al.

    Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network

    Pediatrics

    (1997)
  • L Aksglaede et al.

    Recent decline in age at breast development: the Copenhagen Puberty Study

    Pediatrics

    (2009)
  • M Roelants et al.

    References for growth and pubertal development from birth to 21 years in Flanders, Belgium

    Ann Hum Biol

    (2009)
  • FM Biro et al.

    Onset of breast development in a longitudinal cohort

    Pediatrics

    (2013)
  • RH Willemsen et al.

    Pros and cons of GnRHa treatment for early puberty in girls

    Nat Rev Endocrinol

    (2014)
  • CJ Partsch et al.

    Pathogenesis and epidemiology of precocious puberty. Effects of exogenous oestrogens

    Hum Reprod Update

    (2001)
  • G Teilmann et al.

    Prevalence and incidence of precocious pubertal development in Denmark: an epidemiologic study based on national registries

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • R Lakshman et al.

    Early age at menarche associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2009)
  • P Prentice et al.

    Pubertal timing and adult obesity and cardiometabolic risk in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Int J Obes (Lond)

    (2013)
  • R Ritte et al.

    Height, age at menarche and risk of hormone receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer: a cohort study

    Int J Cancer

    (2013)
  • Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

    Lancet Oncol

    (2012)
  • JC Carel et al.

    Consensus statement on the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in children

    Pediatrics

    (2009)
  • D Xhrouet-Heinrichs et al.

    Longitudinal study of behavioral and affective patterns in girls with central precocious puberty during long-acting triptorelin therapy

    Acta Paediatr

    (1997)
  • JC Carel et al.

    Precocious puberty

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • CJ Partsch et al.

    Management and outcome of central precocious puberty

    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)

    (2002)
  • MD Stephen et al.

    Gonadotropin-dependent precocious puberty: neoplastic causes and endocrine considerations

    Int J Pediatr Endocrinol

    (2011)
  • VN de Brito et al.

    Treatment of gonadotropin dependent precocious puberty due to hypothalamic hamartoma with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist depot

    Arch Dis Child

    (1999)
  • H Jung et al.

    Pathogenesis of precocious puberty in hypothalamic hamartoma

    Horm Res

    (2002)
  • G Teilmann et al.

    Increased risk of precocious puberty in internationally adopted children in Denmark

    Pediatrics

    (2006)
  • A Mouritsen et al.

    Hypothesis: exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may interfere with timing of puberty

    Int J Androl

    (2010)
  • G Rasier et al.

    Mechanisms of interaction of endocrine-disrupting chemicals with glutamate-evoked secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone

    Toxicol Sci

    (2008)
  • F Deng et al.

    Effects of growth environments and two environmental endocrine disruptors on children with idiopathic precocious puberty

    Eur J Endocrinol

    (2012)
  • M Denham et al.

    Relationship of lead, mercury, mirex, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, hexachlorobenzene, and polychlorinated biphenyls to timing of menarche among Akwesasne Mohawk girls

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • S Ozen et al.

    Effects of pesticides used in agriculture on the development of precocious puberty

    Environ Monit Assess

    (2012)
  • Cited by (299)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text