Abnormal neural encoding of repeated speech stimuli in noise in children with learning problems

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00017-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated whether neurophysiologic responses to repeated speech stimuli, presented in quiet and noise, differed between normal children (NL) and children with learning problems (LP).

Methods: Subjects were normal-hearing, school-age children. NL subjects scored significantly better than LP subjects on measures of reading, spelling and speech sound discrimination. Stimuli (40 ms /da/) were presented to the right ear at 80 dB SPL. Stimuli were presented in trains of four, separated within trains by 360 ms. The interval between trains was 1060 ms. Stimuli were presented in quiet and in white noise (S/N+15). Cortical responses were recorded from an electrode placed along the midline at Cz.

Results: Correlations between the first and 4th responses were lower in noise than in quiet for LP subjects only. Response correlations in quiet were no different between groups. There were no root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude differences between groups.

Conclusions: Response correlation in noise suggested that the LP population consisted of two subgroups, one whose responses appeared relatively normal, and another whose responses were severely degraded by repetition in noise. Response correlations in noise were related to behavioral measures of auditory processing and spelling. These findings suggest that abnormal, asynchronous, auditory cortical encoding may underlie some language-based learning problems.

Introduction

The ability of a listener to understand real speech in a natural environment places many demands on the auditory system. Among these demands are the accurate representation of rapidly changing spectral information comprising the speech signal and the separation of this signal from background noise. While all listeners clearly demonstrate impaired perception at extremes in speaking rate and background noise, a subset of listeners experiences enhanced sensitivity to the detrimental effects of repeated stimulation and background noise. Many studies have shown that subjects diagnosed with language-based learning disabilities perform poorly when processing rapid acoustic signals (Tallal and Piercy, 1974, Farmer and Klein, 1995, Hari and Kiesila, 1996, Wright et al., 1997, Nagarajan et al., 1999, Cestnick and Jerger, 2000, Temple et al., 2000). Similarly diagnosed subjects have exceptional difficulty processing acoustic signals which are presented in the presence of noise (Jerger et al., 1987, Breedin et al., 1989, Katz, 1992, Katz et al., 1992, Welsh et al., 1996, Bellis, 1996, Chermak and Musiek, 1997, Cunningham et al., 2001). Neurobiological abnormalities accompany many of these auditory processing deficits (Nagarajan et al., 1999, Temple et al., 2000, Cunningham et al., 2001). These findings contribute to an understanding that some language-based learning disabilities are rooted, in part, in altered representations of acoustic information. Distorted encoding of acoustic speech signals could underlie weakened perception and categorization of phonemic information (Kraus et al., 1996, King et al., 2002). Such deficits could certainly contribute to difficulties in the development of reading and other language skills (Godfrey et al., 1981, Reed, 1989, McBride-Chang, 1996).

While the primary goal of the current study was to understand auditory processing in children with learning problems, there was also motivation to further understand normal neural mechanisms which underlie processing of repeated stimuli, and stimuli in noise, especially when these stresses are combined, as they are in most real listening environments. Studies of normal subjects have shown that cortical responses decrease in amplitude and increase in latency upon repetition of stimuli (Woods and Elmasian, 1986, Budd et al., 1998) and following the addition of noise (Whiting et al., 1998, Martin et al., 1999).

Inspired by the aforementioned findings, the present study was designed to further examine effects of stimulus repetition and background noise on the neural representation of auditory stimuli in normal and learning impaired subjects. Specifically, the intent was to expand upon previous studies, which investigated rapid or repetitive stimuli or noise in isolation, often using simple tonal stimuli. By simultaneously stressing the auditory system with stimulus repetition and background noise, and by using a complex speech stimulus, the present study incorporated conditions which simulated real listening situations more accurately than studies which incorporated some of these features in isolation. Additionally, non-linear transformations throughout the auditory system make difficult the prediction of responses to complex signal patterns based on knowledge of responses to simpler stimuli (Sachs et al., 1983, Rauschecker, 1997). Responses elicited by our paradigm thus provide further insight into the neural representation of speech under ‘real world’ conditions. Since learning disabilities manifest themselves outside of the laboratory in normal, everyday life, it is by mimicking real conditions that we may most accurately describe any neural abnormalities underlying such problems.

Section snippets

Subjects

Subjects were 25 English-speaking children (mean age 11.1±1.8 years) with normal bilateral hearing (pure tone thresholds <20 dB HL for octaves 500–4000 Hz). These children were chosen from a pool of subjects who participated in earlier related studies conducted by this laboratory. In accordance with the approval of this research by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board, all subjects and their legal guardians signed forms which acknowledged their informed consent. Thirteen

Normal, unstressed response

Average responses are shown in Fig. 1. In the best cases, usually in the unstressed responses (i.e. initial stimulus in train, prior to repetition, in quiet), the normal P1/N1/P2/N2 complex could be observed. These consist of the positively deflected P1 occurring around 75 ms post-stimulus-onset, followed by the N1 negativity. These are followed by the second major positive deflection, P2, occurring around 150 ms, followed by the major N2 negativity. The response then gradually returns to

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate the simultaneous effects of background noise and stimulus repetition on speech-evoked cortical responses in normal and learning impaired children. This study demonstrated a deficiency in the neural representation of repeated speech stimuli in noise in children diagnosed with learning problems. Specifically, the timing and subsequent shape of the repeated responses, as reflected by the correlation between responses in noise, were distorted in the learning

Conclusions

A group of children diagnosed with language-based learning problems were shown to encode auditory information in an abnormal way. Specifically, these children exhibited distortion of the timing of cortical responses to repeated speech in noise. This measure of response distortion was related to behavioral measures that tested abilities to perceive and manipulate speech sounds. These findings further support theories that argue for abnormal sensory-encoding bases of higher-level learning

Acknowledgements

Much thanks goes to Cynthia King, Erin Hayes, Catherine Warrier, Jenna Cunningham, Steven Zecker, Ann Bradlow and Jim Baker. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01DC01510 and T32DC0001517.

References (47)

  • D.L Woods et al.

    The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones

    Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol

    (1986)
  • T.J Bellis

    Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: from science to practice

    (1996)
  • S.D Breedin et al.

    Distinguishing auditory and speech-specific perceptual deficits

    Ear Hear

    (1989)
  • T.D Carrell et al.

    Interactive software for evaluating auditory discrimination

    Ear Hear

    (1999)
  • L Cestnick et al.

    Auditory temporal processing and lexical/nonlexical reading in developmental dyslexics

    J Am Acad Audiol

    (2000)
  • G.D Chermak et al.

    Central auditory processing disorders: new perspectives

    (1997)
  • J Cunningham et al.

    Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: development and behavioral correlates of perception

    Ear Hear

    (2000)
  • J.J Eggermont

    Neural interaction in cat primary auditory cortex II. Effects of sound stimulation

    J Neurophysiol

    (1994)
  • M.E Farmer et al.

    The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: a review

    Psychon Bull Rev

    (1995)
  • J.M Fletcher et al.

    The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disabilities

    J Learn Disabil

    (1992)
  • P Heil et al.

    First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex

    J Neurophysiol

    (1997)
  • S Jerger et al.

    Specific auditory perceptual dysfunction in a learning disabled child

    Ear Hear

    (1987)
  • J Katz

    Classification of auditory disorders

  • Cited by (67)

    • Phonetic discrimination mediates the relationship between auditory brainstem response stability and syntactic performance

      2020, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interestingly, though, connections between individual differences in ABR latency and individual differences in language performance in children with ASD have only rarely been investigated; this absence was one motivation to include children with ASD in this test of the Auditory Stability Hypothesis. Recent trends in the study of ABRs have converged on the idea that the stability of subcortical processing of sound has a cascading effect on language functioning (Hornickel & Kraus, 2013; Hornickel, Anderson, Skoe, Yi, & Kraus, 2012; Skoe, Krizman, Spitzer, & Kraus, 2013; Wible, Nicol, & Kraus, 2002; Neef, Müller, et al., 2017). We now designate this as the Auditory Stability Hypothesis, which proposes that unstable neural processing, indexed by a lack of consistency of neural encoding from one instance of a speech sound to the next, interferes with the ability to form a stable representation of the auditory world, which in turn negatively affects higher-level functions that depend on the neural signal, such as language (Hornickel & Kraus, 2013; Skoe et al., 2013; Tecoulesco, Skoe, & Naigles, 2018).

    • Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of speech perception deficits in silence, noise and envelope conditions in developmental dyslexia

      2019, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, SPN was the most contributing factor for later phonological awareness and phonology-mediated reading skills. At the brain level, the link between reading skills and SPN has been investigated mainly through auditory brainstem recordings (Hornickel et al., 2009; Wible et al., 2002). In typically developing children, the auditory brainstem response reflects acoustic differences between contrastive stop consonants.

    • Objective measurement of high-level auditory cortical function in children

      2015, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is considerable evidence in the literature suggesting that auditory temporal processing deficits can be associated with speech, language and reading disorders [1–13]. Research has shown that a sub-group of children with specific language impairment (SLI) and/or developmental dyslexia (specific reading disability), exhibit poor speech perception abilities which are further impaired in the presence of competing noise [14–16]. In addition, poor speech understanding in noise is a consistently reported feature of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) [17–21], where significantly higher signal-to-noise ratios (9 dB) are required when compared with normally hearing peers in order to correctly identify speech stimuli in background noise [22].

    • Functional correlates of the speech-in-noise perception impairment in dyslexia: An MRI study

      2014, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      To date, only a few studies have been specifically designed to investigate neural correlates of the speech-in-noise processing deficit in dyslexia. Electrophysiological studies suggest atypical encoding of speech stimuli when presented with background noise among participants with dyslexia, both at the brainstem (Cunningham, Nicol, Zecker, Bradlow, & Kraus, 2001) and cortical (Warrier, Johnson, Hayes, Nicol, & Kraus, 2004; Wible, Nicol, & Kraus, 2002) levels. Moreover, neuroimaging studies conducted in participants with dyslexia performing various tasks showed functional and morphological anomalies in brain regions specifically involved in speech processing (see Habib, 2000; Heim & Keil, 2004 for reviews).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text