Original articlesDoes paternal uncertainty explain discriminative grandparental solicitude? A cross-cultural study in Greece and Germany
Section snippets
Overview of the comparative study
Neither Smith (1988) nor other authors have clearly shown that the differences in grandparental caregiving behavior result from differences in paternal uncertainty. Only the correspondence between the grandparental rank order and the model of grandparental certainty provides evidence for the p.c. hypothesis. Furthermore, the proximate basis of kin recognition remains unclear. Thus, the present comparative study of Greece and Germany was undertaken to assess whether the rank order of
Samples and data collection
German- and Greek-language questionnaires from a total of 544 subjects (208 Germans, 318 Greeks, 18 other nationalities) were analyzed. Subjects were recruited opportunistically. German respondents were 63.9% female and 35.1% male; 1.0% left gender unspecified. Greek respondents were 47.5% female and 51.9% male (0.6% unspecified). Students constituted 67.3% of the Germans and just 8.2% of the Greeks, but because there were no significant differences in responses to the questions about GPs
Differing number of GPs
Before presenting the results on discriminative grandparental solicitude, possible effects of the number of living GPs during the respondent's childhood need to be considered. In the present study, no effect of the number of GPs on the average GP rating could be detected (Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA): K-W-χ2 = 4.98, df = 3, p >.17, N = 516). Separate analyses of Greek and German samples also did not yield significant results. Moreover, because the following analyses are
Final discussion
The present study replicates the results of Euler and Weitzel (1996) for Germans and demonstrates that confounding variables cannot explain the differential GP caregiving phenomenon. The results for the Greek sample support the assumption that the grandchild's GP rating represents actual grandparental solicitude: In rural Greece, the higher GP rating of males compared to females is obviously a result of a preference for (grand)sons.
Nevertheless, there are new results showing that the theory
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Harald Euler and Martin Daly for their helpful comments and suggestions.
References (25)
- et al.
Paternal confidence and paternal investmenta cross cultural test of a sociobiological hypothesis
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1980) - et al.
Estimating paternity confidence
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1987) Darwinism and Human Affairs
(1979)- et al.
Discriminative grandparental solicitude as reproductive strategy
Human Nature
(1996) VasilikaA Village in Modern Greece. Case Studies in Cultural Anthropology
(1964)- et al.
Parental care and mode of fertilization in ectothermic vertebrates
Evolution
(1981) - et al.
The relationship with grandparentscontact, importance, role conception
International Journal of Aging and Human Development
(1982) Matrilineal inheritancenew theory and analysis
The Behavioral and the Brain Sciences
(1985)Adult grandchildren and their grandparentsthe enduring bond
International Journal of Aging and Human Development
(1992)- Hoffman, E. (1979–1980). Young adults' relations with their grandparents: an exploratory study. International Journal...
Grandparenthood from the perspective of the developing grandchild
Developmental Psychology
College students' expectations of grandparent and grandchild role behaviors
The Gerontologist
Cited by (104)
Grandpaternal care and child survival in a pastoralist society in western China
2022, Evolution and Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Similarly, in rural Greece Pashos (2000) found that paternal grandparents were frequently reported to be more caring than maternal grandparents, while in urban and western settings it is consistently the maternal grandparents (Bishop, Meyer, Schmidt, & Gray, 2009; Danielsbacka et al., 2011; Huber & Breedlove, 2007; Pollet, Nelissen, & Nettle, 2009; Waynforth, 2012). Close proximity reduces the costs of helping, as well as increasing trust between kin (Pashos, 2000). As argued by Chapman et al. (2021), it is important to look beyond superficial similarities between societies (such as resident systems) and consider how the interactions between mating and residence patterns, subsistence modes, sexual divisions of labour and religion influence the relationship between lineage and grandchild survivorship.
Human child-rearing and family from an evolutionary perspective
2020, Cross-Cultural Family Research and PracticeGrandmaternal childcare and kinship laterality. Is rural Greece exceptional?
2019, Evolution and Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Exceptions to the generally prevailing uterine bias are apparently confined to patrilineal societies with virilocal (also called “patrilocal”) postmarital residence practices that oblige brides to leave their natal families to dwell with their in-laws. In such circumstances, uterine grandchildren are relatively inaccessible, and the paternal grandmother (PGM) may provide more grandchild care than the maternal grandmother (MGM) (e.g.King & Elder, 1995; Pashos, 2000: Yi, Pan, Chang, & Chan, 2006; Kaptijn, Thomese, Liefbroer, & Silverstein, 2013; Perry, 2017a). However, the presence of a PGM does not necessarily promote grandchild well-being to the same degree as the presence of an MGM, as numerous studies of survival, growth, and other grandchild outcomes attest (e.g., Fox et al., 2010; Gibson & Mace, 2005; Helton, Boutwell, & DiBernardo, 2017; Perry, 2017a; Sear & Mace, 2008; Strassmann & Garrard, 2011; Tanskanen & Danielsbacka, 2012).
Cues to paternity: Do partner fidelity and offspring resemblance predict daughter-directed sexual aversions?
2018, Evolution and Human BehaviorResemblance Reporting on Children: Sisters Are More Proactive than Brothers
2023, Evolutionary Psychological Science