Regular Article
Metacognitive beliefs about rumination in anger

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1077-7229(03)80012-3Get rights and content

Rumination has been found to heighten angry mood and has been implicated in the maintenance of anger-control problems. Despite this, little is known about the nature of rumination in anger. In this study, 10 patients with anger-control problems were assessed using a semistructured interview to investigate whether they actively ruminated during and after an anger-instigating episode and whether they held positive or negative metacognitive beliefs about ruminating. All patients indicated that they ruminated both during and after an anger incident. Eight patients identified positive metacognitive beliefs concerning the benefits of rumination in improving understanding, preparation, and coping and promoting self-justification of one's behavior. All participants also identified negative metacognitive beliefs. These beliefs related to the adverse emotional impact of rumination and its detrimental effect on functioning and relationships. The conceptual and clinical implications of the study are discussed.

References (23)

  • BaumeisterR.F. et al.

    Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1990)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Metacognition, rumination and road rage: An examination of driver anger progression and expression in Australia

      2022, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
      Citation Excerpt :

      In support, dysfunctional metacognitions have been shown to be reliable antecedents of psychological vulnerability (Wells, 2019), present in multiple psychological conditions (i.e., generalised anxiety disorder, depressive disorders, obsessive compulsive disorder, psychosis, and eating disorders; Sun, So, Zhu, & Leung, 2016). Regarding anger related conditions, Simpson and Papageorgiou (2003) explain that individuals with anger-control problems, ruminate during and after anger inducing events due to positive metacognitive beliefs that are concerned with self-justification of rumination (e.g., rumination helps individuals identify weaknesses in their behaviour). In their qualitative study, patients with anger-control problems elaborated that rumination improved their understanding of anger-inducing events, but also provided self-justification for their aggressive behaviours.

    • The role of distress and fear transdiagnostic dimensions in emotion regulation choice

      2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, increases on the distress subfactor were associated with greater odds of choosing reappraisal. This finding may be attributed to the fact that those with high distress predisposition value engaging with their emotions when considering regulatory strategies, because it would allow them to reframe their emotional experience (Papageorgiou and Wells, 2003; Simpson and Papageorgiou, 2003). However, what they value as beneficial strategy may be discrepant from what they actually implement.

    • Rumination and Related Constructs: Causes, Consequences, and Treatment of Thinking Too Much

      2020, Rumination and Related Constructs: Causes, Consequences, and Treatment of Thinking Too Much
    • The metacognitions about self-critical rumination questionnaire

      2017, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      This style of thinking, referred to as the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS), is based on metacognitions, which are the beliefs that we hold about our cognitive experience and how to control it. To date, metacognitions have helped to understand the processes involved in problem drinking (Caselli and Spada, 2013; Spada and Wells, 2006), problem gambling (Spada et al., 2014), nicotine use (Nikčević and Spada, 2010), procrastination (Fernie and Spada, 2008), anger (Simpson and Papageorgiou, 2003) and depressive rumination (Papageorgiou and Wells, 2001a, 2001b). The S-REF model is also central to Metacognitive Therapy (MCT), which has been successfully applied to the treatment of psychological disorders (Normann et al., 2014; Wells, 2009).

    • Domestic violence offending behaviors: A review of the literature examining childhood exposure, implicit theories, trait aggression and anger rumination as predictive factors

      2017, Aggression and Violent Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      More generally, research has been conducted into gender differences among those who are more likely to engage in rumination when compared to individuals who are prone to distraction and do not ruminate. Researchers have noted that generally, women tend to opt into being distracted following an anger inducing incident whereas men were more likely to engage in rumination (Simpson & Papageorgiou, 2004). This may explain the historically high prevalence of male perpetrators of DV, and the link between developmental risk factors (e.g. poor emotional regulation) and subsequent DV.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text