International articleThe determinants of sexual intercourse before age 16
Introduction
The substantial lowering of the age of first sexual intercourse, along with the unchanging age at first long-term sexual union, seen in industrialised countries, has lengthened the period of unstable sexual relationships. This has increased the vulnerability of adolescents to sexually transmitted diseases 1, 2, 3. In both the United States and New Zealand, adolescent pregnancy rates are high compared to other developed countries 4, 5. Most young women who had sexual intercourse before age 16 years reported, at age 21, that they should have waited longer before having sex (6). A continuing rise in sexual risk behaviours is not inevitable, as has been shown by the latest results of the Youth Risk Behaviour Survey in the United States, showing that fewer high school students were sexually experienced in 1997 compared to 1991 (7).
Biological, family, peer, school and community factors all may influence the age of initiation of sexual intercourse (8). Some investigators have emphasized factors in the current family environment as determining decisions about sexual behaviour (9), while others believe that the child or adolescent is an actor as well as a reactor, selecting and shaping the environment to which she has been exposed (10). The latter emphasis leads to a consideration of individual factors, such as personality and biological characteristics, in determining behaviour. We agree with the approach of Small and Luster (11) that there are many diverse paths to a particular behaviour and that it is unlikely that any one theoretical orientation will fully explain early sexual activity. This is also implied by Jessor, who has described a loose explanatory framework for adolescent risk behaviour, which is akin to the epidemiological concept of the web of causation (12). The framework consists of distinct domains: biology, social environment, perceived environment, personality and behaviour.
Even though populations of Western countries are subject to similar social and cultural forces which determine the overall increase in early sexual intercourse (13), these forces have different effects on individuals. Individual, family, and community factors are still important in determining an individual’s vulnerability to negative developmental outcomes (11). Indeed factors which affect individual vulnerability may be the only ones that clinicians, parents and school teachers might be able to influence. As society changes, the importance of these factors may change too, so it is important to look at them for recent generations.
Our study provides a special opportunity to examine the relative importance of social factors and individual factors as predictors of early sexual intercourse in a population in which approximately one-third of both young men and young women have experienced sexual intercourse before age 16 years. We have chosen to compare those who have experienced intercourse before age 16 years with the rest of the cohort, because we have already shown that females in this group report higher rates of coercion at first intercourse and subsequent regret, and both sexes report higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases (6). Sixteen years is also the legal age of consent in New Zealand.The longitudinal and multidisciplinary nature of the research has enabled us to examine a wide range of factors collected earlier in life, in the domains already shown to be important for determining adolescent risk behaviour, in relation to later sexual activity.
Section snippets
Methods
The members of the sample were enrolled in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a longitudinal study of a cohort born in Dunedin, New Zealand between 1 April 1972 and 31 March 1973. The sample members were first assessed at three years of age when 1037 of 1139 eligible children were seen. Since then the sample members have been seen every two years until age 15 years, then at ages 18 and 21 years. Most have been assessed within a month of their birthday. The sample was
Results
Of the 1037 members of the cohort formed at age 3 years, 1,020 were believed to be alive at the 21 year old assessment in 1993 and 1994. Of these, nine could not be contacted, 19 refused to participate in the study, 42 completed a telephone or shortened assessment that did not include questions on sexual behaviour, 14 declined to answer the questions on sexual behaviour, and for one person the computer failed to save the responses. Thus 935 (91.7% of survivors) completed the questions on sexual
Discussion
In this birth cohort, where similar proportions of young men and women reported first intercourse before age 16 years, the characteristics of males and females who had early intercourse differed. For males, there were more characteristics which predicted early intercourse (in the unadjusted analyses) than was the case for the females. Thus for males socioeconomic status, parental education, maternal teenage birth, family structure and functioning, outside home activities, religious activities,
Acknowledgements
Supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand and the Phyllis Paykel Memorial Scholarship.
This study was part of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, directed by Dr. Phil Silva. We thank Louise Garrett and Denise Powell who monitored the interviews, and other staff who were involved in data collection for earlier phases of the study. We appreciate helpful comments from David Ferguson, Rob McGee, Libby Plumridge and Sheila Williams. We particularly thank the
References (44)
Risk behavior in adolescenceA psychosocial framework for understanding and action
J Adolesc Health
(1991)Age at first experience of intercourse among Norwegian adolescentsA lifestyle perspective
Soc Sci Med
(1991)- et al.
Sexual behaviour in young people
Balliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
(1996) - et al.
Female adolescents and onset of sexual intercoursea theory-based review of research from 1984–1994
J Adolesc Health
(1997) - et al.
Late adolescent risk-takingeffects of perceived benefits and perceived risks on behavioural intentions and behavioural change
J Adolescence
(1997) - et al.
Sex education in schoolsan overview with recommendations
Public Health
(1994) - et al.
Adolescents, sexual behaviour and implications for an epidemic of HIV/AIDS among the young
Genitourin Med
(1993) - et al.
Sexually transmitted diseases among teenagers in England and Wales
Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev
(1997) Effect of changes in human ecology and behaviour on patterns of sexually transmitted diseases, including immunodeficiency virus infection
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
(1994)- Hershaw SK. US Teenage Pregnancy Statistics with Comparative Statistics for Women Aged 20–24. New York: Alan Guttmacher...
First sexual intercourseage, coercion, and later regrets reported by a birth cohort
BMJ
Adolescent sexual behaviour
Am Psychol
The effects of family structure on the sexual behaviour of adolescents
Adolescence
Childhood precursors of age at first intercourse for females
Arch Sex Behav
Adolescent sexual activityAn ecological, risk-factor approach
J Marriage & Family
Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles
The Elley-Irving Socio-Economic Index 1981 census revision
NZ J Educ Studies
The inventory of parent and peer attachmentindividual differences and their relationship to psychological wellbeing in adolescence
J Youth Adolesc
Cited by (160)
Opportunity and the sexual abuse of adolescents
2021, Child Abuse and NeglectUnderstanding teen sex in Bangladesh: Results from Global School Health Survey 2014
2020, Children and Youth Services ReviewSexual addiction
2020, Adolescent Addiction: Epidemiology, Assessment, and TreatmentSelf-esteem as an adaptive sociometer of mating success: Evaluating evidence of sex-specific psychological design across 10 world regions
2019, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Other researchers have reported a positive correlation between self-esteem and indicators of short-term mating, but the effects were largely localized to men and not women (Jessor & Jessor, 1975; Stratton & Spitzer, 1967). Importantly, many researchers have found no relationship at all between self-esteem and short-term mating (Cvetkovich & Grote, 1980; MacCorquodale & DeLamater, 1979; McGee & Williams, 2000; Paul, Fitzjohn, Herbison, & Dickson, 2000; Visser, Pozzebon, Bogaert, & Ashton, 2010; Walsh & Balasz, 1990). And in some studies, short-term mating attitudes and behaviours have been negatively linked to self-esteem (Boden & Horwood, 2006; Hornick, 1978).