Use of the life optimism test among adolescents in a clinical setting: A report of reliability testing

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00123-7Get rights and content

This study examined the consistency and reliability of the Life Optimism Test (LOT) among patients attending an adolescent medicine clinic. The LOT had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.56 at pretest to 0.76 at posttest) and good 1-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.84). These data support use of the LOT to measure optimism among adolescents.

References (10)

  • ScheierMF et al.

    Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies

    Health Psychol

    (1985)
  • ScheierMF et al.

    Dispositional optimism and recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery: The beneficial effects on physical and psychological wellbeing

    J Personal Social Psychol

    (1989)
  • CarverCS et al.

    How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer

    J Personal Social Psychol

    (1993)
  • AspinwallLG et al.

    Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance

    J Personal Social Psychol

    (1992)
  • RobbinsAS et al.

    Psychological determinants of health and performance: The tangled web of desireable and undesireable characteristics

    J Personal Social Psychol

    (1991)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Association of optimism with cardiometabolic risk in adolescents

    2013, Journal of Adolescent Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    We measured optimism using the Life Orientation Test–Revised (LOT-R), a six-item revision of the Life Orientation Test [22]. Although the original Life Orientation Test has been validated in youth [23], a revised version (the LOT-R) created by alternate scoring of the original test was subsequently introduced to better account for other competing predictors of disposition, such as coping strategies [22], and is now the accepted measure. Because the LOT-R has not been validated for use in adolescents, we performed a sensitivity analysis comparing correlations between each biomarker with both the LOT and LOT-R (Table 1).

  • Optimism and the socioeconomic status gradient in adolescent adiposity

    2011, Journal of Adolescent Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    The Institutional Review Boards at the participating university and local children's hospital approved all study procedures. Optimism was assessed using the Life Orientation Test, a scale validated for use in adolescents [7]. Parent education as reported by a parent/guardian, a measure less dynamic than income, was used to indicate SES.

  • Mediators of the Relationship between Social Support and Positive Health Practices in Middle Adolescents

    2008, Journal of Pediatric Health Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, the findings of those studies have been consistent with the theoretic literature. For example, Goodman, Knight, and DuRant (1997) and Mahon and Yarcheski (2002) reported coefficient α values ranging from .58 to .78 in samples of adolescents. In the present sample, the coefficient α was .83.

  • Socioeconomic Differences in Adolescent Stress: The Role of Psychological Resources

    2007, Journal of Adolescent Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, this study found that optimism explains more of the SES-stress relation among whites relative to blacks. Because the LOT, unlike the A-COPE, has been validated in a diverse sample of youth [21], it is likely that these differences are true differences, and not an artifact related to measurement. In contrast to optimism, which may link lower parent education and higher stress, coping’s relationship to stress appeared unrelated to the SES-stress gradient.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was funded in part by Project MCJ-MA 259195 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration, DHHS.

View full text