The sit-up: complex kinematics and muscle activity in voluntary axial movement
Introduction
We investigated the sit-up because it represents a useful behavioral model for studying how the central nervous system (CNS) coordinates natural voluntary movements, which often involve large numbers of joints, degrees of freedom in joint motion, and muscles. Most previous studies of motor coordination focused on simple movements involving just one or a few joints, usually in one extremity. The study of coordinated movements at individual joints presupposes that the coordination of complex, multi-joint movements can be reconstructed from the summation of coordination at individual joints. Such a simplistic perspective was shown by Bernstein [8] to apply predominately to laboratory analogs of coordinated movement, rather than to natural motor behavior. Consequently, at this time there still exists little understanding of how complex movements involving multi-link kinematic chains are coordinated, particularly those involving proximal and axial muscles.
The goal of the study presented here was to identify qualitatively the different components of the sit-up that need to be coordinated for the movement to succeed or, stated another way, to identify the most critical loci of coordination in the sit-up. By the term ‘coordination’, we mean the imposition of a consistent, temporal or spatial relationship among different components of a movement, be those components structural (e.g. central vs. peripheral control), kinematic, or neuromuscular. By first establishing what elements of the sit-up are coordinated, we will then be able to analyze each element in detail in order to clarify the underlying mechanisms of coordination (see Ref. [16]).
Currently, relatively little is known about the coordination of natural, complex movements. Previous studies of complex axial movements focused more on their biomechanics and exercise value than on their mechanisms of coordination. For example, a number of studies examined the sit-up, to determine its exercise value [[5], [20], [21], [22], [25], [30], [34]] and its physiological risk [19], [22], [28]. Similarly, weight lifting was evaluated (e.g. Ref. [37]) to determine how to minimize the risk of back injury during its execution. However, a number of studies have examined patterns of muscle activity in complex movements [[5], [19], [20], [21], [22], [25], [34]], which has provided insight into the underlying mechanisms of coordination. The principal insight from these studies is that muscles in complex movements are not activated and deactivated simultaneously, as typically found in simpler movements involving a single extremity.
The experimental approach used in our study was to first decompose the sit-up into phases based on kinematics. Two major components of the sit-up were identified, and these were further subdivided into five ‘phases’, based primarily on trunk and leg motion. Within each phase, we also identified subcomponents that appeared to have a specific mechanical function and that might be discretely controlled by the actions of specific muscles. We also studied the pattern of muscle activity within each phase, across a number of muscles from the neck to the legs, to determine whether the activation pattern changed in each phase. We hypothesize that changes in the activation pattern across muscle populations indicate changes in CNS control of the movement.
The experimental analysis addressed four questions, based on our preliminary observation [14], [15] that this movement has two distinct parts—one flexing the trunk and the other rolling the pelvis and trunk into a sitting position. The first question addressed was: does the CNS control these two parts of the sit-up differently? Because the center of gravity (CoG) is located rostral to the pelvis in the supine individual, a major subtask of the sit-up is to move the CoG caudally through the pelvic axis of rotation in order to provide the leverage necessary for the sit-up to be successfully executed. The second question investigated was: when does the CoG pass through the rotational axis in the sit-up? A substantial number of individuals, with and without neurological disorders [6], are unable to perform a complete sit-up. The third question addressed was: is there a particular (i.e. critical) point in the sit-up at which the sit-up will most likely fail without the appropriate coordination? Finally, previous qualitative analyses of muscle activity during the sit-up have shown this activity lacks simultaneity. The fourth question addressed was: does the intramuscular pattern of muscle activity change significantly during the sit-up? Such changes would indicate the presence of serial control, in addition to the more typical parallel control observed in simpler movements.
Preliminary reports of this study have been presented in abstract form [14], [15], and a review of complex movements has been published as a book chapter [16].
Section snippets
Methods
Eight human subjects (ages 18–49; five, male; three, female) with no known neuromuscular disorders participated in this study after signing an informed consent form approved by the OHSU Institutional Review Board. Subjects accepted into the study were relatively fit and capable of performing sit-ups without difficulty. Each subject—wearing brief shorts and, in the case of female volunteers, a sports bra (Fig. 1)—lay supine upon a force plate, on a force table. Recordings were made of horizontal
Results
The sit-up appears to the eye as a single, fluid motion of the body axis (e.g. Fig. 2A), despite the large number of muscles recruited and joints moved. However, results indicate otherwise. Each stick figure in Fig. 2A illustrates the position of the body axis at a 100-ms interval for a representative sit-up. Shortly after sit-up onset, the total trunk angular velocity peaked (greater distance between the stick figures), then slowed to a minimum just before the mid-point (small distance between
Discussion
The study presented in this paper represents an initial investigation into how the human CNS coordinates voluntary movements that are biomechanically complex, a characteristic of many natural voluntary movements. We have argued, primarily on theoretical grounds, that there may exist many aspects of motor coordination that might only be revealed in complex movements [16]. The purpose of this study was to analyze the kinematics and EMG activity associated with sit-ups in order to identify what
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Graham Kerr, Ph.D. and Ron Jacobs, Ph.D. for their contributions to the development of the force table and to the National Institutes of Health for funding this project (AR31017, AR46007). S.V. was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium. S.B. was supported by the Research Council of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
References (40)
- et al.
A sequence of postural movements precedes voluntary movement
Neurosci. Lett.
(1981) - et al.
Mechanics of constrained chair rise
J. Biomech.
(1991) - et al.
Biomechanical analysis of rising from a chair
J. Biomech.
(1992) - et al.
Human arm trajectory formation
Brain
(1982) Pathologie du cervelet
- et al.
Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements
J. Neurosci.
(1985) - et al.
Axial synergies during human upper trunk bending
Exp. Brain Res.
(1998) - et al.
Abdominal and hip flexor muscle activation during various training exercises
Euro. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol.
(1997) De l’asynergie cerebelleuse
Rev. Neurol.
(1899)- et al.
Elements of control of voluntary movement
Biofizika
(1967)
On the construction of movement
Relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat
J. Physiol.
The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles
J. Physiol.
Properties of postural adjustments associated with rapid arm movements
J. Neurophysiol.
Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: Role of velocity and position information
J. Neurophysiol.
Proprioceptive coordination of axial movement
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
The sit-up: preparatory postural movement coupled to a focal movement
Gait & Posture
Forward and backward axial synergies in man
Exp. Brain Res.
Die Funktionen des Kleinhirns
Cited by (19)
Effects of real-time visual biofeedback of pelvic movement on electromyographic activity of hip muscles and lateral pelvic tilt during unilateral weight-bearing and side-lying hip abduction exercises
2019, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyCitation Excerpt :Interactions between RVBF and the movement sequence of the pelvis and hip during anticipatory postural adjustment may also explain our findings. During tasks involving movements of the hip, pelvis, and trunk, the sequence of joint movements influences the peak muscle activation pattern (Cordo et al., 2003; Cordo and Gurfinkel, 2004). During unilateral WB tasks, the center of mass is moved to the supporting limb side by horizontally shifting the pelvis as an anticipatory postural adjustment before foot-off in the moving limb (Tateuchi et al., 2011; Tateuchi et al., 2016).
Trunk muscle activation during golf swing: Baseline and threshold
2013, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyCitation Excerpt :Multiple peaks can be associated with auxiliary actions to the agonist activity and with the action that is divergent in the different phases. General muscle activity pattern becomes complex for time patterns, with a qualitative change from one phase to the next, which suggests different function performance (Cordo et al., 2003). For EO, we found an almost simultaneous activation for onset burst in both sides, as if it were a co-contraction process.
Velocity of isokinetic trunk exercises influences back muscle recruitment patterns in healthy subjects
2013, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyCitation Excerpt :Nevertheless, McGill (1996) indicates that the contribution of the obliques to flexion may be underestimated and that these muscles may play a greater role in flexion than previously suggested. Cordo et al. (2003) analysed the patterns of muscle activity during the sit-up movement. They found that the RA and the EO reach their peak relative EMG activity in the same phase of the movement, during the lower-trunk curling, suggesting EO and RA are both torque producing muscles during the flexion movement.
The myth of core stability
2010, Journal of Bodywork and Movement TherapiesCitation Excerpt :It requires intricate interactions between the relative timing, duration, force, muscle lengths and velocities of contraction of immediate synergists (Shirado et al., 1995a,b; Radebold et al., 2000, see Table 1). Further complexity would arise from the fact that these patterns would change on a moment-to-moment basis and with different movement/postural tasks (McGill et al., 2003; Cordo et al., 2003; Moseley et al., 2003a,b). This pattern of muscle activity observed in standing with the arm outstretched is likely to change in bending forward or twisting.
Scaling and non-scaling of muscle activity, kinematics, and dynamics in sit-ups with different degrees of difficulty
2006, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyMotor coordination can be fully understood only by studying complex movements
2004, Progress in Brain Research