The role of goals and affect in working memory functioning

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80006-0Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigated the direct and mediated effects of mastery and performance goals, negative affect, and task-irrelevant thoughts on working memory in a sample of undergraduates (N = 177). Results indicated that negative affect mediated the positive relation between mastery goals and working memory; students with mastery goals reported decreased negative affect, which in turn was related to enhanced working-memory functioning. In contrast, performance goals had a negative indirect relation to working memory by increasing negative affect. After controlling for negative affect, there was also a positive relation between performance goals and working memory for males, but not for females. Finally, task-irrelevant thoughts were not a significant predictor of working memory when negative affect was in the model, and were subsequently removed from the model. Implications for the relation between achievement goals, working memory, and cognitive outcomes are discussed.

References (36)

  • M Daneman et al.

    Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

    (1996)
  • M DiCintio et al.

    The influence of goal orientation on working memory capacity

  • C Dweck et al.

    A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality

    Psychological Review

    (1988)
  • A Elliot et al.

    Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1999)
  • E Elliott et al.

    Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement

    journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1988)
  • H.C Ellis et al.

    Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory

  • H.C Ellis et al.

    Depressed mood, task organization, cognitive interference, and memory: Irrelevant thoughts predict recall performance

    Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

    (1997)
  • K.J Gilhooly et al.

    Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks

    Memory and Cognition

    (1993)
  • Cited by (74)

    • 2-dimensional cognitive test anxieties and their relationships with achievement goals, cognitive resources, motivational engagement, and academic performance

      2021, Learning and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the 1399 students produced the following results: χ2 (8, N = 1399) = 24.28, p < 0.05; RMSEA = 0.039, GFI = 0.99, AGFI = 0.98, NFI = 1.00, NNFI = 1.00, CFI = 1.00, and IFI = 1.00; the individual item reliability ranged between 0.51 and 0.91; the composite reliabilities of avoidance-mastery and avoidance-performance goals were 0.95 and 0.83, respectively, and the corresponding average variance extracted from the two factors were 0.86 and 0.63. A cognitive resources scale (four items, α = 0.93; e.g., “Before taking the science exam, I can fully be absorbed in preparing for the exam”), which was developed based on the studies of Linnenbrink et al. (1999) and Hoddap (1997). A CFA of the 1399 students produced the following results: χ2 (2, N = 1399) = 1.77, p < 0.05; RMSEA = 0.000, GFI = 1.00, AGFI = 1.00, NFI = 1.00, NNFI = 1.00, CFI = 1.00, and IFI = 1.00.

    • Effects of achievement goals on self-control

      2021, Contemporary Educational Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Administration of the practice trials, achievement goal manipulations, and experimental tasks was processed by a computer program. After the experiment was completed, participants responded to a 5-item survey on task-irrelevant thoughts (e.g., “I thought about things other than the task”, Linnenbrink et al., 1999) and another 5-item survey on state anxiety (e.g., “During the task, I thought about how poorly I am doing compared with other students”, Duncan & McKeachie, 2005). The Cronbach’s alphas were 0.86 and 0.80, respectively.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text