Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial

doi:10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80007-9

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volume 27, Issue 1, February 1999, Pages 30-37

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80007-9 Get rights and content

Summary

Stereolithographic (SL) biomodelling is a new technology that allows three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) data to be used to manufacture solid plastic replicas of anatomical structures (biomodels). A prospective trial with the objective of assessing the utility of biomodelling in complex surgery has been performed.

Forty-five patients with craniofacial, maxillofacial, skull base cervical spinal pathology were selected. 3-D CT or MR scanning was performed and the data of interest were edited and converted into a form acceptable to the rapid prototyping technology SL. The data were used to guide a laser to selectively polymerize photosensitive resin to manufacture biomodels.

The biomodels were used by surgeons for patient education, diagnosis and operative planning. An assessment protocol was used to test the hypothesis that ‘biomodels in addition to standard imaging had greater utility in the surgery performed than the standard imaging alone’. Biomodels significantly improved operative planning (images 44.09%, images with biomodel 82.21%, P<.01) and diagnosis (images 65.63%, images with biomodel 95.23%, P<.01). Biomodels were found to improve measurement accuracy significantly (image measurement error 44.14%, biomodel measurement error 7.91%, P<.05). Surgeons estimated that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 17.63% and were cost effective at a mean price of $1031 AUS. Patients found the biomodels to be helpful for informed consent (images 63.53%, biomodels 88.54%, P<.001). Biomodelling is an intuitive, user-friendly technology that facilitated diagnosis and operative planning. Biomodels allowed surgeons to rehearse procedures readily and improved communication between colleagues and patients.

References (29)

AnderlH.D et al.
CT-guided stereolithography as a new tool in craniofacial surgery
Br. J. Plast. Surg.
(1994)
ArvierJ.F. et al.
Maxillofacial Biomodelling
Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1994)
BillJ.S. et al.
Stereolithography in oral and maxillo facial operation planning
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1995)
CuttingC et al.
Computer-aided planning and evaluation of facial and orthognathic surgery
Clin. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
(1986)
GroenvoldM. et al.
Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement
J. Clin. Epidemiol.
(1997)
SmithB.H. et al.
The chronic pain grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research
Pain
(1997)
StokerN.G. et al.
Stereolithographic models for surgical planning: preliminary report
J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1992)
AbbottJ. et al.
Craniofacial imaging, models and prostheses
Aust. J. Otolaryng.
(1994)
BarkerT.M. et al.
Integration of 3-D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models
Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med.
(1993)
CuttingC. et al.
Three-dimensional computer-assisted design of craniofacial surgical procedures: optimization and interaction with cephalometric and CT-based models
Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
(1986)

DuncanJP

Anatomical definition and modelling

Engineering in Medicine

(1986)

D'UrsoP.S

Stereolithographic modelling process

(1993)

D'UrsoP.S. et al.

Fetal Biomodelling

Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol.

(1998)

FujiokaM. et al.

Computer-aided interactive surgical simulation for craniofacial anomalies based on 3-D surface reconstruction CT images

Radiat. Med.

(1988)

Cited by (230)

The Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived 3D-Printed Models on Endodontic Microsurgical Treatment Planning and Confidence of the Operator
2023, Journal of Endodontics
Currently, there are no studies evaluating the impact of 3-dimensional (3D) printed models on endodontic surgical treatment planning. The aims of this study were: 1) to determine if 3D models could influence treatment planning; and 2) to assess the effect of 3D supported planning on operator confidence.
Endodontic practitioners (n = 25) were asked to analyze a preselected cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of an endodontic surgical case and answer a questionnaire that elucidated their surgical approach. After 30 days, the same participants were asked to analyze the same CBCT scan. Additionally, participants were asked to study and to perform a mock osteotomy on a 3D printed model. The participants responded to the same questionnaire along with a new set of questions. Responses were statistically analyzed using chi square test followed by either logistic or ordered regression analysis. Adjustment for multiple comparison analysis was done using a Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at ≤0.005.
The availability of both the 3D printed model and the CBCT scan resulted in statistically significant differences in the participants' responses to their ability to detect bone landmarks, predict the location of osteotomy, and to determine the following: size of osteotomy, angle of instrumentation, involvement of critical structures in flap reflection and involvement of vital structures during curettage. In addition, the participants’ confidence in performing surgery was found to be significantly higher.
The availability of 3D printed models did not alter the participants’ surgical approach but it significantly improved their confidence for endodontic microsurgery.
The role of computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3- dimensional printing in head and neck oncologic surgery: A review and future directions
2022, Oral Oncology
Microvascular free flap reconstruction has remained the standard of care in reconstruction of large tissue defects following ablative head and neck oncologic surgery, especially for bony structures. Computer aided design/computer assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3-dimensionally (3D) printed models and devices offer novel solutions for reconstruction of bony defects. Conventional free hand techniques have been enhanced using 3D printed anatomic models for reference and pre-bending of titanium reconstructive plates, which has dramatically improved intraoperative and microvascular ischemia times. Improvements led to current state of the art uses which include full virtual planning (VP), 3D printed osteotomy guides, and patient specific reconstructive plates, with advanced options incorporating dental rehabilitation and titanium bone replacements into the primary surgical plan through use of these tools. Limitations such as high costs and delays in device manufacturing may be mitigated with in house software and workflows. Future innovations still in development include printing custom prosthetics, ‘bioprinting’ of tissue engineered scaffolds, integration of therapeutic implants, and other possibilities as this technology continues to rapidly advance. This review summarizes the literature and serves as a summary guide to the historic, current, advanced, and future possibilities of 3D printing within head and neck oncologic surgery and bony reconstruction. This review serves as a summary guide to the historic, current, advanced, and future roles of CAD/CAM and 3D printing within the field of head and neck oncologic surgery and bony reconstruction.
Facial defects reconstruction by titanium mesh bending using 3D printing technology: A report of two cases
2022, Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Citation Excerpt :
Craniomaxillofacial deformities (CM) increase in number during war times [6], and they require precise reconstruction, as they affect not only the main functions like vision, swallowing, speech, breathing, and mastication; but also the physical appearance [7]. The use of digital surgical technologies has developed in CM reconstructive surgeries, as they enhance surgical procedures and lead to better outcomes for restoring both form and function [8]. The combination between three-dimensional (3D) techniques and radiology allowed the surgeon to better understand the anatomical surgical location of the patient and its exact pathology because every patient is a unique case that requires its own understanding.
Facial injuries and deformities have received special attention during the previous decades for their functional, esthetic impairment, surgical challenges related to the location of the intervention, and their relationship to a lower survival rate. Moreover, there have been many surgical reconstructive methods due to the different materials and tools available and thus the final results following the surgical intervention.
This study was conducted on two patients with severe war injuries; they both suffered from a significant loss in one or more of the following bones: the zygomatic bone, maxilla, nasal bone, infraorbital rim, and mandible. They were treated using preshaped 3D titanium mesh implants that were made using polylactic acid (PLA) material. The final shape was identified depending on pregenerated multislice 3D modeling using computed tomography (CT) scan.
The patient-specific titanium implants produced using polylactic acid (PLA) have been an important option for reconstructive surgical interventions in facial injuries. It has achieved a better outcome in comparison with manual bent titanium mesh in terms of anatomical symmetry, overall operating time, functional and esthetic impairment. These points helped achieve better care for both civilian and war injuries associated with bone loss.
3D-Printing in surgery: Beyond bone structures. A review
2021, Annals of 3D Printed Medicine
Additive manufacturing (AM), otherwise known as 3D-Printing (3DP) or rapid prototyping (RP), is the fabrication of an object from zero by means of depositing materials layer by layer. 3DP allows the creation of complex geometrical objects such as human anatomy. 3DP applications in a surgical setting have mainly been described for anatomical models (surgical planning, simulation and education), customized implants, prostheses and surgical guides. In order to 3DP for surgical planning, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images are converted to Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files. This process is called segmentation. Segmentation of bone structures is nowadays quite automated, whilst this becomes a challenge when dealing with other anatomical parts such as organs or soft tissues. This review explores what can be done in 3DP for surgical planning beyond bone structures, the current available technology, and clinical applications, limitations of printers and materials and ongoing research.
Towards the development of an optimized digital technology for the implementation of customized natural material implant systems
2021, Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
The processing technologies have made it possible to develop customized implants for maxillofacial applications using biomaterials such as inert, natural, or composite biomaterials. Today, maxillofacial implants are digitally designed and fabricated directly without the need for physical anatomical models and prosthetists, thanks to advances in computing power, 3D modeling software, and manufacturing technologies. This correspondence article outlines the main features of the optimization process of a bio-filling material using the finite element method (FEM) which is a mathematical simulation method for mechanical analysis. It is widely used for biomechanical analysis of complex structures with different shapes, loads, and materials [17], with software such as ANSYS and SOLIDWORKS as design and analysis tools, to make the manufacturing system efficient and sustainable, with the implementation of a sustainable design approach.
Patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial surgery: A manufacturer's experience: Custom CMF surgery: 4120 cases
2021, Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Additive manufacturing technologies have enabled the development of customised implants for craniomaxillofacial applications using biomaterials such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), porous high-density polyethylene (pHDPE), and titanium mesh. This study aims to report an Australian manufacturer's experience in developing, designing and supplying patient-specific craniomaxillofacial implants over 23 years and summarise feedback received from clinicians. The authors conducted a retrospective review of the manufacturer's implant database of orders placed for custom craniomaxillofacial implants between 1996 and 2019. The variables collected included material, country of order, gender, patient age, and reported complications, which included a measure of custom implant “fit” and adverse events. The development of critical checkpoints in the custom manufacturing process that minimise clinical or logistical non-conformities is highlighted and discussed. A total of 4120 patient-specific implants were supplied, of which 2689 were manufactured from PMMA, 885 from titanium mesh, and 546 from pHDPE. The majority of the implants were used in Australia (2260), United Kingdom (412), Germany (377), and New Zealand (338). PMMA was the preferred material for cranial implants whereas pHDPE was preferred for maxillofacial applications. Age or gender did not influence the material choice. Implant “fit” and adverse outcomes were used as a metric of implant performance. Between 2007 and 2019 there were 37 infections (0.98%) and 164 non-conformities recorded of which 75 (1.8%) were related to implant ‘fit’. Our experience demonstrates a safe, reliable, and clinically streamlined manufacturing process which supports surgeons that require bespoke craniomaxillofacial solutions for reconstruction surgery.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial

Summary

Br. J. Plast. Surg.

Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.

Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.

Clin. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.

J. Clin. Epidemiol.

Pain

J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.

Craniofacial imaging, models and prostheses

Aust. J. Otolaryng.

Integration of 3-D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models

Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med.

Three-dimensional computer-assisted design of craniofacial surgical procedures: optimization and interaction with cephalometric and CT-based models

Plast. Reconstr. Surg.