Cleft palate repair: Furlow versus von Langenbeck

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80190-8Get rights and content

Summary

The Furlow cleft palate repair using a double opposing Z-plasty appears to be very promising. In order to detect advantages and disadvantages concerning the technique as well as speech- and hearing results, the Furlow palatoplasty was compared with the classical von Langenbeck technique. Data analysis from 10 children in both groups revealed that the Furlow technique proved to be superior to the von Langenbeck technique as far as speech sound is concerned: at a mean age of 3.5 years, nasality and nasal escape were absent in almost all cases. However, there were no significant differences between the techniques in respect of articulatory skills, language comprehension, language production as well as hearing. Technically, the Furlow technique is more difficult to perform, particularly in wide clefts.

References (8)

  • WalterC. et al.

    A new method for the closure of a cleft palate

    J. Max.-Fac. Surg.

    (1978)
  • CaffeeH.H.

    Discussion on cleft palate repair by double opposing Z-plasty

    Plast. Reconstr. Surg.

    (1986)
  • FurlowL.T.

    Cleft palate repair by double opposing Z-plasty

    Plast. Reconstr. Surg.

    (1986)
  • Goorhuis-BrouwerS.M. et al.

    Tijdig herkennen vah stoornissen in de ontwikkeling van taal en spraak

    Tijdschr. Jeugdgezondheidszorg

    (1982)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (70)

  • Patient and surgical factors that affect the development of velopharyngeal insufficiency

    2022, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    A secondary outcome identified in this study was that Furlow and von Langenbeck palatoplasty offer similar amounts of post-operative lengthening; however, von Langenbeck palatoplasty is associated with a higher incidence of VPI. The Furlow palatoplasty is a double opposing Z-plasty that is thought to offer superior muscle exposure and overlap when compared to the von Langenbeck palatoplasty, which may in turn lead to a superior muscle repair and better speech outcomes.13,14 This is a possible explanation for the decreased rate of VPI that was found to be associated with the Furlow palatoplasty in this study.

  • Comparison of speech outcomes using type 2b intravelar veloplasty or furlow double-opposing Z plasty for soft palate repair of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

    2021, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Also, in the literature, many authors advocate the effect of hard palate repair technique and staged palatal repair on speech and surgical results (Pigott et al., 2002; Stein et al., 2019). Non-standardized palatal repair technique is one of the shortcomings of the studies analyzing speech outcomes between Furlow palatoplasty and intravelar veloplasty (Spauwen et al., 1992; McWilliams et al., 1996; Gunther et al., 1998). Comparing distinct surgical techniques, many studies have suggested better speech outcomes in Furlow palatoplasty (Horswell et al., 1993; McWilliams et al., 1996; Williams et al., 2011; Stein et al., 2019).

  • Cleft Lip and Palate

    2021, Cummings Pediatric Otolaryngology
  • Effect of Cleft Palate Closure Technique on Speech and Middle Ear Outcome: A Systematic Review

    2019, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    For example, is the prevalence of OME after a specific palatal surgical technique equivalent to the prevalence of OME in children without CP? Second, in the section on OME, 3 of the 5 articles were published more than a decade ago.4,15,16 With ever-advancing medical practices, these results might be too outdated to make any conclusions.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text