Research reportAuditory and visual automatic attention deficits in developmental dyslexia
Introduction
Developmental dyslexia is defined as a specific reading disorder despite normal intelligence and teaching, and in the absence of any manifest sensory deficit [1]. Studies have provided evidence for a phonological deficit in developmental dyslexia [4]. However, the problems of dyslexic children extend beyond the skills directly involved in reading. Indeed, recent studies provide evidence of spatial and temporal processing deficits in dyslexia [42], [22]. Also, dyslexics show visual abnormalities [19] as well as deficits in processing tactile stimuli [20], in balance and motor control [33], which could result from a more general problem in the selection of stimuli [22].
The magnocellular (M) theory of dyslexia [42] holds that the crucial disorder is a neurodevelopmental impairment of a crossmodal system responsible for processing rapid streams of stimuli. The information processed by the M system ends in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), which is the basic area of multimodal spatial attention [11]. There is evidence that a supramodal space representation exists in the PPC with convergence of both auditory and visual inputs [17], and there is also evidence of crossmodal cells in PPC [2]. Thus, the neural pathways previously thought to be sensory-specific are in fact strongly modulated by signals from other modalities [37]. The PPC may be involved in spatial selection independently of modality [9] through a multimodal map that would be used for orienting attention in both the auditory and visual modalities [47].
In fact, the deficits in dyslexia often manifest themselves in the auditory modality with problems in speech–sound perception (phoneme discrimination) in the presence of background noise [10]. Also, dyslexic children have difficulties in discriminating between acoustically similar sounds [44] and in processing rapid sound sequences [21], [25]. That could be due to impaired ‘magnocells’ in the medial geniculate nucleus [18]. Evidence for an auditory spatial selection deficit in dyslexics was provided by Asbjornsen and Bryden [3]. These auditory perception deficits are likely related to an inability to rapidly shift auditory attention in order to discriminate properly the features of the sound [22]. In fact, several studies demonstrated that phoneme identification may be substantially influenced by the spatial distribution of auditory attention [30], [31], providing strong evidence that selective spatial attention may act to facilitate auditory perception.
In addition, it is clear that many visuospatial selection functions contribute to reading and that selective attention to words or string of words requires a filter controlled by rapid visual orienting [5]. Thus, spatial attention deficits may degrade the perception of visual elements like letters and words, during reading [19]. Difficulties with reading could be due to sluggish orienting [15], [16], [24].
Recent studies suggest that the causal link from the M deficit to reading and phonological impairments involves automatic capture of attention [22], [23].
In the present study, we measured the covert automatic capture [34] of both auditory and visual attention in 17 children diagnosed with specific reading disorder or dyslexia, and seven control children with normal reading skills, who were matched for age and IQ.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
In test 1 the participants fixated the central point of a visual display, and a non-informative auditory cue, delivered by headphones, preceded the onset of a subsequent target tone in the left or right ear. In test 2, we measured the automatic orienting of visual attention in the same children. Participants fixated the central point of a display, and a non-informative visual cue preceded the onset of a subsequent target in the left or right visual field. After variable intervals from the onset
Test 1: auditory attention
Errors, that is responses on catch trials and missed responses, were less than 2% and were not analyzed. Outliers were defined as RTs faster than 150 ms or more than 2.5 standard deviations above the mean and were excluded from the data sets before the analyses were carried out. In the present experiment, this resulted in the removal of approximately 2% of all observations. Eye movements were about 1% of total trials.
Mean correct RTs were analyzed with a mixed three-way analysis of variance
Discussion
Several studies provided evidence that auditory attention may be allocated to a specific location in response to an auditory spatial cue (e.g., Refs. [32], [41]). Other studies demonstrated that auditory spatial attention may act to facilitate both auditory perception and phoneme identification [30], [31]. Accordingly, recent studies supported the perceptual model of auditory spatial attention as a sensory gating [45], [46]. Spatial attention may directly influence perceptual processing, so
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Molteni and M. Pezzani for access to their clinical units, S. Bettella for technical assistance, and K. Priftis, M. Zorzi and two anonymous reviewers for help in improving this manuscript. This work was supported by the Italian CNR, MS, and the “Amici della Pediatria” Association of Bergamo General Hospital.
References (49)
- et al.
Auditory attentional shifts in reading-disabled students: quantification of attentional effectiveness by the Attentional Shift Index
Neuropsychologia
(1998) - et al.
Effects of stimulus source and intensity on covert orienting to auditory stimuli
Neuropsychologia
(1996) Cross-modality temporal processing deficits in developmental phonological dyslexics
Brain Cogn.
(2001)- et al.
Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2001) - et al.
Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement
Clin. Neurophysiol.
(2001) - et al.
The role of visuospatial attention in developmental dyslexia: evidence from rehabilitation study
Cogn. Brain Res.
(2003) - et al.
Visual-spatial attention in developmental dyslexia
Cortex
(2000) - et al.
Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal?
Neuropsychologia
(1989) - et al.
Dyslexic children learn a new strategy for reading: a controlled experiment
Vis. Res.
(1994) - et al.
Tactile perception in developmental dyslexia: a psychophysical study using gratings
Neuropsychologia
(1999)
Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults
Neurosci. Lett.
Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Prolonged attentional dwell time in dyslexic adult
Neurosci. Lett.
Inhibition of return
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Hemispheric prevalence in acoustical attention
Brain Cogn.
The influence of attention on the dichotic REA
Neuropsychologia
Developmental dyslexia: the cerebellar deficit hypothesis
Trends Neurosci.
Attentional modulation of visual motion perception
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: the evidence from contrast sensitivity
Vis. Res.
Spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity, coherent motion, and visible persistence in developmental dyslexia
Vis. Res.
To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia
Trends Neurosci.
Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit?
Vis. Res.
Auditory temporal perception, phonetic, and reading disabilities in children
Brain Lang.
Cited by (115)
Rules generalization in children with dyslexia
2024, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesEnhanced disengagement of auditory attention and phonological skills in action video gamers
2022, Computers in Human BehaviorVisual and Auditory Interference Control of Attention in Developmental Dyslexia
2020, Journal of the International Neuropsychological SocietyAction video games normalise the phonemic awareness in pre-readers at risk for developmental dyslexia
2024, npj Science of Learning