Research reportCortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli
Introduction
It is generally accepted that motor control involves at least two discernible mechanisms, one of which is concerned with the control of movements in the spatial domain and the other with movement timing. In order to study movement timing, the paced finger-tapping (PFT) task is often used in which subjects produce a series of isochronous finger taps, first in synchrony with an external pacing stimulus (synchronisation, S) and then continuing on their own (continuation, C). Some of these studies seem to support the existence of an internal time-keeping system that is thought to be independent of external feedback mechanisms [48], [50]. Other studies support the contrasting notion that taps are synchronised with the external pacing stimuli at the central level by superimposing in time two sensory codes: a tactile/kinaesthetic code that represents the tap (the afferent movement code) and an auditory code that represents the click (the afferent code that results from the guiding signal). It is thus argued that external feedback may play a substantial role for the timing of isochronous taps [2]. Research in patients has linked control of motor timing to a number of motor structures, including the lateral cerebellum and its primary output nucleus, the dentate nucleus [18], [19], the basal ganglia [34], [39], [38], and the supplementary motor area (SMA) [15].
Two recent brain imaging studies employing the PFT paradigm provided results supporting the view that the lateral cerebellar cortex as well as the basal ganglia are involved in the production of timed motor responses. In the study of Rao et al. [40] subjects were imaged applying whole-head functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while tapping with their right index finger in synchrony with tones separated by two intervals. The results of their study suggest that the internal generation of precisely timed movements is dependent on three interrelated neural systems, one that is involved in explicit timing (putamen, ventrolateral thalamus, SMA), one that mediates auditory sensory memory (inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; superior temporal gyrus, STG), and another that is involved in sensorimotor processing (dorsal dentate nucleus, sensorimotor cortex). A most interesting result of their study is that the right auditory cortex together with the right inferior frontal gyrus is active during the continuation condition in which no explicit auditory pacing stimulus is present. Thus, these results support the notion that in a situation where external sensory input is lacking, a kind of internal generation of the auditory pacing stimuli might take place. A further main result of their study was that SMA as well as cerebellar activation was stronger for the continuation condition, although that was not explicitly tested. In a second brain imaging study (PET technique) related to that topic, Penhune et al. [36] applied auditory and visual pacing stimuli in the context of a PFT paradigm, without, however, using a continuation condition. Their results provide support for a supramodal contribution (independent of stimulus modality) of the lateral cerebellar cortex and cerebellar vermis to the production of a timed motor response. They also gave partial support to the involvement of the basal ganglia in motor timing. In addition, they demonstrated that sensory association areas and the ventromedial frontal cortex were involved in modality-specific encoding of the temporal pacing stimuli. Unfortunately, they did not use a continuation condition which would have allowed to confirm the findings of the Rao et al. study [40]. Furthermore, it would be interesting to know whether the visual cortex is active during a continuation condition, similar to the auditory continuation condition in the study of Rao et al.
Because there are partly conflicting results and some questions unanswered we designed the present study. The research questions are, in particular: (1) to delineate those brain structures which are involved in the control of the PFT task; (2) whether there are differences between auditory and visual pacing conditions in terms of activated brain areas; and (3) to test whether the visual continuation condition is indeed associated with increased activation in visual sensory areas. We thus designed an fMRI experiment in which subjects reproduced an isochronous tapping sequence paced by auditory and visual stimuli and were instructed to continue tapping when these stimuli were discontinued. Similar to the study of Penhune et al. [36] we predicted that if timing is a central process, the activation pattern should be closely similar for the two modalities. In line with the findings of Rao et al. [40], we further predicted that the auditory and visual cortex is active during the auditory and visual continuation conditions.
Section snippets
Subjects
Eight healthy, right-handed male adult subjects (age range, 20–32 years) volunteered for this study. All were consistent right-handers as measured by standard handedness tests [37]. Subjects were paid and gave informed consent according to institutional guidelines (Ethics Committee of the University of Düsseldorf).
Experimental protocol
Subjects lay supine on a MRI scanner bed with their right index finger placed on a response keypad, located on the right thigh. The wrist as well as all of the inactive fingers were
Performance data
Table 1 displays the mean intertap intervals (ITI) for all conditions. ITIs that exceeded 50% of the target interval duration were excluded from the reaction time data. This occurred in less than 1% of all trials and mostly at the beginning of a condition, i.e., reflecting a problem of starting the PFT task in time. As can be seen from Table 1, ITIs precisely matched the prescribed pacing rhythm. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements on both factors (modality: auditory
Discussion
The present experiment was designed to delineate those brain structures which are involved in the control of paced finger-tapping in the context of visual or auditory pacing stimuli both when the pacing stimulus was present (synchronisation) or absent (continuation). The performance measures obtained in the present study were basically similar to those found in previous experiments applying the same task [2], [23], [32], [40]. In summary, we found a ‘negative lag-effect’ during the
Conclusion
The main finding of the present study is a principle difference in terms of performance measures and brain activations between the auditory and visual tapping tasks. The auditory tapping tasks (AS and AC) were generated with less intertap variability than the visual tasks, thus suggesting different control modes. In terms of brain activation the auditory tasks are accompanied with stronger activations in a network comprising bilaterally of the vPMC, the left SMA, the right inferior cerebellum,
Acknowledgements
This study was financed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG JA 737/7-1 and JA 737/7-2).
References (50)
- et al.
Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI
Neuroimage
(1995) - et al.
Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited
Neuroimage
(1995) - et al.
Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study
Neuropsychologia
(1998) Information processing for motor control in primate premotor cortex
Behav. Brain Res.
(1994)Site of origin of projections from the thalamus to dorsal versus ventral aspects of the premotor cortex of monkeys
Neurosci. Res.
(1994)Premotor cortex: sensory cues and movement
Behav. Brain Res.
(1985)On dopaminergic modulation of temporal information processing
Biol. Psychol.
(1993)- et al.
From grasping to speech: imitation might provide a missing link: reply
Trends. Neurosci.
(1999) - et al.
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Brain Res.Cogn. Brain Res.
(1996) - et al.
Effects of responding hand and concurrent verbal processing on time-keeping and motor-implementation processes
Brain Cogn.
(1993)
Cortical control of saccades and fixation in man. A PET study
Brain
Synchronizing actions with events: the role of sensory information
Percept. Psychophys.
Primate frontal eye fields. II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements
J. Neurophysiol.
The relationship between synchronization among neuronal populations and their mean activity levels
Neural Comput.
3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes
Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex
J. Neurophysiol.
Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4)
J. Neurophysiol.
The role of cerebral cortex in the generation of voluntary saccades: a positron emission tomographic study
J. Neurophysiol.
Analysis of functional MRI time-series
Hum. Brain Mapp.
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach
Hum. Brain Mapp.
Functional imaging of procedural motor learning: relating cerebral blood flow with individual subject performance
Hum. Brain Mapp.
Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex
J. Neurophysiol.
The role of premotor cortex and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control of movement in man
Brain
Bimodal (auditory and visual) left frontoparietal circuitry for sensorimotor integration and sensorimotor learning
Brain
Merging of oculomotor and somatomotor space coding in the human right precentral gyrus
Brain
Cited by (253)
The influence of accuracy constraints on bimanual and unimanual sequence learning
2021, Neuroscience LettersWould you notice if fake news changed your behavior? An experiment on the unconscious effects of disinformation
2021, Computers in Human BehaviorBrain activation patterns during visuomotor adaptation in motor experts and novices: An FDG PET study with unrestricted movements
2021, Journal of Neuroscience Methods