Original articleDeterminants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease is still the leading cause of mortality in the developed world. Despite evidence that blood pressure control may reduce premature cardiovascular mortality 1, 2, and despite the availability of effective treatment for high blood pressure, a high proportion of identified hypertensive individuals are not controlled (mean diastolic or systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg or 140 mgHg, respectively) 3, 4, 5.
Poor adherence including discontinuation of the recommended drug regimen constitutes a major barrier to adequate control of high blood pressure [3]. Indeed, providing there has not been a life style behavioral modification to compensate, individuals with established hypertension can no longer benefit from a reduction in their blood pressure if they stop the use of antihypertensive drugs. For those who are persisting with drug therapy, poor adherence is likely to interfere with a satisfactory treatment outcome.
Previous studies have focused on discontinuation of newly prescribed antihypertensive drugs 6, 7, 8, 9. Estimates of the proportion of those patients still on initial treatment after a few months, have varied from study to study, but generally it is poor: less than 50% of patients continue their initial treatment after 12 months 6, 7. Among those who persist on antihypertensive therapy, around 20% experience a modification in their initial treatment [8].
Some studies, mostly analyses of administrative databases, have so far shown that discontinuation of antihypertensive drug treatment is associated with younger patients as opposed to older ones 7, 9, with men as opposed to women [9], and to a regimen dosing of more than once a day [7]. These studies did not explore patient characteristics such as their perception of health, beliefs about the disease, and about the efficacy of its treatment, as potential determinants of discontinuation of treatment.
This study was designed to examine the effect of an array of potential predisposing, enabling and reinforcing factors on the discontinuation of initial antihypertensive medication. We conducted a prospective cohort study in a community-based setting of individuals newly prescribed antihypertensive monotherapies.
Section snippets
Methods
We addressed the determinants of discontinuation through a network of 173 pharmacies across Canada who recruited eligible hypertensive individuals from February 1996 to October 1997. Eligible subjects were hypertensive individuals aged 18 years or over who had acquired a first prescription of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker, or an angiotensin II antagonist as a monotherapy. The subjects could be either newly diagnosed hypertensives receiving their first
Results
We recruited a total of 692 individuals. Between the first and second interviews, we lost 10 individuals (Fig. 1). Because these people had no follow-up period, we excluded them from the analysis. Of 682 individuals, 609 (89%) completed the fourth interview.
A total of 358 subjects (52.5%) were recruited from pharmacies located in Canadian cities of less than 25,000 inhabitants, while 163 (23.9%) were from cities of more than 100,000 inhabitants [16]. Characteristics of the study population are
Discussion
The results of this study confirm what has been reported in recent studies 6, 7, 8, 9: individuals initiating a new course of antihypertensive medication exhibit, within a few months, a poor persistence to their prescribed drug treatment.
Our major finding was to identify three important reasons for discontinuation of the drug treatment. First, the finding that patients perceived benefits of a drug treatment may predict persistence to said treatment is consistent with the Health Belief Model,
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by Merck Frosst Canada under the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec partnership program with industry. The authors thank Edeltraut Kröeger, MSc, who coordinated the project and conducted interviews, and Lucilla Leung, BScPharm, Drew Peddie, BScPharm, Nancy Risebrough, BSc, Eric Tremblay, MSc, and Andy Troszok, BScPharm, who participated as regional coordinators. We also thank Isabelle Mercier for helping in data collection and entry, and for conducting interviews.
References (27)
- et al.
Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressureprospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias
Lancet
(1990) - et al.
Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in Canada
Am J Hypertens
(1997) Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy
Clin Ther
(1998)- et al.
Patient-perceived side effects to antihypertensive drugs
Am J Prev Med
(1985) - et al.
Safety and tolerability of losartan potassium, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, compared with hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, felodipine ER, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for the treatment of systemic hypertension
Am J Cardiol
(1995) - et al.
Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents. A systematic review and meta-analysis
JAMA
(1997) The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
(1997)- et al.
Blood pressure in Spain. Distribution, awareness, control, and benefits of a reduction in average pressure
Hypertension
(1998) - et al.
Discontinuation of and changes in treatment after start of new courses of antihypertensive drugsa study of a United Kingdom population
BMJ
(1995) - et al.
Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapythe importance of actual practice data
CMAJ
(1999)