Original articlePsychological attributes and changes in disability among low-functioning older persons: Does attrition affect the outcomes?
Introduction
The effects of attrition of study participants from one wave of data collection to the next are of concern to researchers conducting panel studies. Particularly, research in the field of clinical medicine, geriatrics, and gerontology is often complicated by the fact that nonresponse is substantially associated with morbidity and age. Specific to the study of the elderly is the burden of decline in all areas, which is much greater than in younger populations. This has consequences for the participation rate that should be achieved 1, 2. The question rises whether the outcome of studies in this area may be generalized to the population where the study sample comes from. Particularly in longitudinal or follow-up studies where attrition is related to the entrance in the study as well as to participation at follow-up, generalizability may become a serious problem. Several studies have been conducted on the determinants of attrition in aging studies. Powell et al. [3], for example, showed that impaired physical health and a general disengagement from social and personal activities were associated with attrition in older persons. Slymen et al. [4] found that attrition was related to older age, lower income, and poorer health. However, much less attention has been paid to an examination of the impact of attrition on specific research outcomes. In the present paper, we seek to examine the effect of attrition at follow-up on the outcomes of a study in low-functioning elderly persons. More specifically, we study whether an empirical verification of a research hypothesis on the impact of two psychological attributes on changes in disability over 2 years' time is affected by attrition. The results of this study concerning the impact of psychological attributes on the trajectories of disability have been published previously [5]. The researchers hypothesized that high levels of both mastery and self-efficacy expectancies slow down the progression of disability. Their findings confirmed this hypothesis. To test their hypothesis, the researchers selected a low-functioning sample of 753 older persons, as changes in functional ability within a 2-year interval were particularly expected in moderately disabled elders. Five hundred seventy-five persons participated in a follow-up, 2 years later. Attrition was due to mortality (n = 58), poor physical and/or mental health (n = 66), and refusal (n = 54); the 178 nonparticipants at follow-up were excluded from the original paper. In the present paper, we particularly focus on the impact of the attrition of these 178 persons (23.6%) on the outcomes of the study.
Section snippets
Sample
The data were obtained from a subsample (n = 753) of the baseline participants (n = 5,279) in the Groningen Longitudinal Aging Study (GLAS) in 1993. This is a population-based prospective follow-up study of the determinants of health-related quality of life of elderly people, with special emphasis on physical and social disability and well being 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. The primary objective of GLAS is to identify the psychosocial factors that influence the trajectory of the quality of life, either
Results
Table 1 shows the descriptive baseline statistics for those who continued to participate (n = 575), for those who did not participate at follow-up due to mortality (n = 58), poor physical and/or mental health (n = 66) and refusal (n = 54), and for the total baseline sample (n = 753). The results show that continuing participants were younger than those who did not participate due to mortality or health problems. The mean age of the refusers was similar to the mean age of the continuing
Conclusion and discussion
The main objective of the present panel study was to analyze whether research outcomes from a previous study [5] were affected by attrition at follow-up. The researchers hypothesized and reported that high levels of mastery and self-efficacy expectancies slow down the progression of disability in low-functioning older persons. What can be concluded from the results of the present study? First, attrition at follow-up is clearly related to age and levels of disability at baseline. Particularly
Acknowledgements
This research is part of the Groningen Aging study (GLAS). GLAS is conducted by the Northern Centre for Healthcare Research (NCH) and various Departments of the University of Groningen in The Netherlands. The primary departments involved are Health Sciences, Family Medicine, Psychiatry, Sociology (ICS) and Human Movement Sciences. GLAS and its substudies are financially supported by the Dutch government (through NESTOR), the University of Groningen, the Faculty of Medical Sciences, the Dutch
References (32)
- et al.
Relationship of domain-specific measures of health to perceived overall health among older subjects
J Clin Epidemiol
(1998) - et al.
Mini-Mental State; a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
J Psychiatr Res
(1975) - et al.
The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties
Soc Sci Med
(1996) - et al.
Confirmatory factor analyses of the general self-efficacy scale
Behav Res Ther
(1998) - et al.
Attrition in longitudinal studieshow to deal with missing data
J Clin Epidemiol
(2002) Experiences from longitudinal studies of aging. Conceptualization, organization, and output
(1989)- et al.
Refusal rates in a longitudinal study of older peopleimplications for field methods
J Gerontol Soc Sci
(1992) - et al.
Some determinants of attrition in prospective studies on aging
Exp Aging Res
(1990) - et al.
Determinants of non-compliance and attrition in the elderly
Int J Epidemiol
(1996) - et al.
The impact of psychological attributes on changes in disability among low-functioning older persons
J Gerontol Psychol Sci
(1999)
Personality, chronic medical morbidity and health-related quality of life among older persons
Health Psychol
Adaptive responses among Dutch elderlythe impact of eight chronic conditions on health-related quality of life
Am J Public Health
Functioning, well-being and health perception in late middle-aged and older people. Comparing the effects of depressive symptoms and chronic medical conditions
J Am Geriatr Soc
Chronic medical conditions and mental health status in older peopledisability and psychosocial resources mediate specific mental health effects
Psychol Med
The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey—reliability and validity in a patient population
Med Care
The assessment of ADL among frail elderly in an interview surveyself-report versus performance-based tests and determinants of discrepancies
J Gerontol Psychol Sci
Cited by (63)
Does attrition affect estimates of association: A longitudinal study
2019, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchLoss to follow-up was used to estimate bias in a longitudinal study: A new approach
2015, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyChallenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: A systematic review
2014, Archives of Gerontology and GeriatricsWeighting of the data and analytical approaches may account for differences in overcoming the inadequate representativeness of the respondents to the third wave of a cohort study
2013, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :This is highlighted in NWAHS with the previous analysis of bias undertaken at wave 1 of the study [7] showing no differences in self-reported general health status compared with the population, but a significant difference now being reported. Further analyses could be undertaken to compare the baseline characteristics of the respondents still in the study with those who have dropped out although, as argued by others, it is important to determine how different continuing participants are from the broader population rather than detailed comparison of those still in and those out of the study [9]. We have learned that loss to follow-up is an important component of a cohort study and that careful and considered attention should be paid to loss to follow-up.