Changing care staff approaches to the prevention and management of aggressive behaviour in a residential treatment unit for persons with mental retardation and challenging behaviour

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(96)00043-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The impact of a new training procedure aimed at improving staff skills in the preventative and reactive management of severely challenging behaviours was investigated within a six-place residential treatment unit. The results showed that there was some evidence to support the notion that the training reduced the number of behavioural incidents for most residents. The rates of major reactive strategy use (restraint and emergency medication) also declined over time, as did rates of staff and resident injury. Although only a limited number of these changes showed statistically significant correlations with time, it is argued that they were clinically significant when viewed against the complexity of the client group under study.

References (28)

  • J. Harris

    Physical restraint procedures for managing challenging behaviour presented by mentally retarded adults and children

    Research in Developmental Disabilities

    (1996)
  • M.G. Aman et al.

    Aberrant Behaviour Checklist: Manual

    (1986)
  • M.G. Aman

    Assessing psychopathology and behaviour problems in persons with mental retardation: A review of available instruments

    (1991)
  • E.G. Carr et al.

    The wrong issue: Aversive vs. nonaversive treatment. The right issue: functional vs. nonfunctional treatment

  • J.S. Colond et al.

    Preventing restrictive placements through community support services

    American Journal on Mental Retardation

    (1995)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    Challenging behaviour and community services 2: Who are the people who challenge services?

    Mental Handicap

    (1988)
  • Department of Health and Social Security

    Violence to staff: Report of the DHSS advisory committee on violence to staff

    (1988)
  • Department of Health and Welsh Office

    Code of practice. Mental Health Act 1983

    (1993)
  • A. Doyle et al.

    Preventing and responding to aggressive behaviour: A training manual

    (1996)
  • J. Hill et al.

    Staff injury rates associated with the implementation of contingent restraint

    Mental Retardation

    (1987)
  • A. Hoefkens et al.

    Evaluation of a special behaviour unit for people with mental handicaps and challenging behaviour

    Journal of Mental Deficiency Research

    (1990)
  • R.H. Horner et al.

    Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioural support

    Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps

    (1990)
  • G.W. La Vigna et al.

    The role of positive programming in behavioural treatment

  • K. Lowe et al.
  • Cited by (62)

    • Initiatives to reduce the use of seclusion and restraints on people with developmental disabilities: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis

      2013, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      In all studies, the visual inspection of graphs and reporting of frequency data were the main forms of data analysis. In two studies, these analyses were supplemented with ordinary least squared analyses (Allen, McDonald, Dunn, & Doyle, 1997) and non-parametric statistics (Jensen et al., 2012). All studies focused on physical or mechanical restraint reduction, with no studies being identified on seclusion reduction initiatives.

    • Reduction of restraint of people with intellectual disabilities: An organizational behavior management (OBM) approach

      2011, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      In clinical settings where individuals exhibiting dangerous behavior are served, despite the best of efforts to prevent all restraint, restraint is sometimes necessary to prevent injuries (Luiselli, in press; Luiselli, 2009; Matson & Boisjoli, 2009). Williams (2010) classified published restraint reduction efforts as consisting of five approaches: (1) restraint fading (the systematic withdrawal of mechanical restraint typically worn continuously as protective equipment to prevent severe self-injurious behavior (e.g., Lerman, Iwata, Smith, & Vollmer, 1994; Pace, Iwata, Edwards, & McCoch, 1986); (2) staff training programs (e.g., Allen, McDonald, Dunn, & Doyle, 1997), Singh et al. (2009) and Finn and Sturmey (2009); (3) assessment and modification of antecedent conditons (e.g., Luiselli, Kane, Treml, & Young, 2000; Luiselli, Dunn, & Pace, 2005), and (4) modification of the release criterion from restraint (see Luiselli, 2009; Luiselli, Pace, & Dunn 2006; Luiselli, in press); and (5) successful treatment (e.g., Foxx & Mindl, 2007). This study adds a sixth method for restraint reduction, organizational behavior management.

    • Reducing and eliminating restraint of people with developmental disabilities and severe behavior disorders: An overview of recent research

      2010, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Restraint reduction is not a recent event with behavior analysis, it is a longstanding practice in the area of restraint fading. Allen, McDonald, Dunn, and Doyle (1997) evaluated the effects of a staff training program to improve prevention and management of interventions with people exhibiting physical aggression. The program focused on understanding the aggression, primary prevention (removing known setting events associated with problem behavior), and secondary prevention (recognizing and acting on precursors to aggression, a sort of “early intervention” to prevent escalations), reactive strategies (minimal physical intervention), and post-incident support.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text