Beyond social capital: the role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success
Section snippets
Executive summary
Venkataraman (1997) and Shane and Venkataraman (2000) have recently suggested that a key focus for the field of entrepreneurship should be “Why, when, and how some people and not others discover and exploit opportunities.” (Italics added.) In this research, we focus on a question closely related to this suggestion: Why are some entrepreneurs more successful than others in exploiting opportunities they have discovered?
Previous efforts to address this important issue have often considered the
Participants
Two samples of entrepreneurs participated in the study — a total of 230 individuals. Those in the first sample were 159 independent sales contractors who created their own cosmetics distribution organizations, and also created or helped to “spin off” additional independent distribution organizations. All were female and all ran their businesses from their homes in one mid-western state.
The entrepreneurs in our second sample were 71 top executives in high-tech entrepreneurial firms recruited
Preliminary analyses
In order to determine whether the items on the questionnaire assessed distinct aspects of social competence, a principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation was performed on the total sample (the initial and replication studies; n=230). Parallel analysis (Horn, 1965) was then applied to determine the appropriate number of factors to retain. Parallel analysis generates an artificial data set with the same number of observations, variables, means, and standard deviations as the
Discussion
The results of the present research offer support for the hypothesis that the higher entrepreneurs' social competence, the greater their financial success. For both samples, accuracy in perceiving others (social perception) was significantly related to a measure of financial success. In addition, for entrepreneurs in the cosmetics industry, social adaptability was related to such success (although not quite significantly so; P<.06). Finally, for entrepreneurs in the high-tech industry,
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their sincere appreciation to Rob McDonald for his outstanding assistance with respect to data analysis and to Gerald R. Ferris for supplying articles and references directly relevant to the present research.
References (68)
Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people
J. Bus. Venturing
(1998)- et al.
Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making
J. Bus. Venturing
(1997) - et al.
Exploring start-up event sequences
J. Bus. Venturing
(1996) - et al.
Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?
J. Bus. Venturing
(1998) - et al.
An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: evidence from the biotechnology industry
J. Bus. Venturing
(1999) - et al.
A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry
J. Bus. Venturing
(1990) - et al.
A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start-up behaviors and success at venture creation
J. Bus. Venturing
(1995) - et al.
Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: rational decision-making or escalation of commitment?
J. Bus. Venturing
(1993) - et al.
Market valuation of joint ventures: joint venture characteristics and wealth creation
J. Bus. Venturing
(1997) - et al.
A proclivity for entrepreneurship: a comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers
J. Bus. Venturing
(1999)
Hostile environmental jolts, transaction set, and new business
J. Bus. Venturing
The effects of impression management on the performance appraisal process
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes
Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach
Psychol. Bull.
Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: the potential effects of thinking about what might have been
J. Bus. Venturing
Psychological perspectives on entrepreneurship: cognitive and social factors in entrepreneurs' success
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
Beyond social capital: the role of social skills in entrepreneurs' success
Acad. Manage. Exec.
Marketplace information scanning activities of new manufacturing ventures
J. Small Bus. Manage.
A prisoner's dilemma approach to entrepreneur–venture capitalist relationships
Acad. Manage. Rev.
Interpersonal influence
Entrepreneurial teams
Dot-Com Millionaire? Get a Life
Emotional intelligence: in search of an elusive construct
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Spotting lies: can human learn to do better?
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness: the affective communication test
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity
“Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question
Am. J. Small Bus.
Acting as if: differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior
Entrepreneurship Theory Pract.
The interpersonal circumplex as a behavior map
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Emotional Intelligence
Working with Emotional Intelligence
Resources in small firms: an exploratory study
J. Small Bus. Strategy
Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization
Cited by (595)
Rural-urban migration, financial literacy, and entrepreneurship
2024, Journal of Business ResearchDoes financial literacy drive entrepreneurship in rural China?
2024, Finance Research LettersFamily determinants of entrepreneurial success - The mediational role of self-esteem and achievement motivation
2024, Journal of Business ResearchDoes social media affect performance in e-commerce business? The role of customer management
2023, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and ComplexityInfluences of sibling disability and childhood caregiving experiences on interest in a disability-specific helping profession
2023, Children and Youth Services Review
- 1
Tel.: +1-518-276-2864.